Jane Addams and the Lost Paradigm of Sociology

• Authors: Vessela Misheva
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The present work is the beginning of a discussion that again addresses the question of Jane Addams’ sociological heritage. That latter is defined as a puzzle which may finally have a solution in that all of the pieces now appear to have been collected. The approach taken to recovering Addams’ identity as a sociologist involves a historico-sociological exploration of the influences upon the formation of her sociological thought, with a focus on Auguste Comte, the Father of Sociology. The article argues that Addams emulated Comte’s scientific mission and took upon herself the task of continuing his project by following another route to the goal. She is thus Comte’s successor, and even rival, insofar as she sought to establish sociology as a science that may be placed in charge of producing knowledge about social life and has the social mission of finding solutions to social problems that politicians proved incapable of tackling. Addams emerges from the discussion as the creator of a sociological paradigm that was dismissed, dismantled, and then lost in the process of the scientific revolution that took place unnoticed after the end of World War I, when the normal period of the scientific development of sociology in America came to an end. The suppression during the 1920s of the type of sociology that Addams developed and adhered to has left sociology in a state of unresolved identity crisis and arrested scientific development.

Keywords

EN

Sociological Paradigm; Sociological Canon; Addams’s Sociological Identity; Comte’s Unfinished Project; Mechanism of Emulation; Symbolic Interactionism

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Qualitative Sociology Review
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 15
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 216-228

Dates

published

2019-05-24

Contributors

author

Vessela Misheva

References

• Addams, Jane. 1910. Twenty Years at Hull-House with Autobiographical Notes. New York: MacMillan.
• Addams, Jane. 2002a [1910]. “The Snare of Preparation.” Pp. 100-113 in The Jane Addams Reader, edited by Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Basic Books.
• Addams, Jane. 2002b [1881]. “Cassandra.” Pp. 10-13 in The Jane Addams Reader, edited by Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Basic Books.
• Addams, Jane. 2002c [1893]. “The Subjective Necessity for a Social Settlement.” Pp. 14-28 in The Jane Addams Reader, edited by Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Basic Books.
• Addams, Jane. 2002d [1893]. “The Objective Value of a Social Settlement.” Pp. 29-45 in The Jane Addams Reader, edited by Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Basic Books.
• Baker, Keith M. 1989. “Closing the French Revolution: Saint-Simon and Comte.” Pp. 323-339 in The French Revolution and the Creation of Modern Political Culture: Vol. 3, The Transformation of Political Culture 1789-1848, edited by François Furet and Mona Ozouf. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bryant, C. G. A. 1975. “Kuhn, Paradigms and Sociology.” British Journal of Sociology 26:354-359.
• Calhoun, Craig. 2007. “Preface.” Pp. ix-xiv in Sociology in America: A History, edited by Craig Calhoun. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Claeys, Gregory. 2005. “Early Socialism.” Pp. 184-191 in Encyclopedia of Nineteenth-Century Thought, edited by Gregory Claeys. London, New York: Routledge.
• Connell, R. W. 1997. “Why Is Classical Theory Classical?” American Journal of Sociology 102(6):1511-1557.
• Cooley, Charles Horton. 1902. Human Nature and Social Order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
• Deegan, Mary Jo. 2005. Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892-1920. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.
• Eckberg, Douglas Lee and Lester Hill, Jr. 1979. “The Paradigm Concept and Sociology: A Critical Review.” American Sociological Review 44(6):925-937.
• Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 2002. Jane Addams and the Dream of American Democracy. A Life. New York: BasicBooks.
• Franklin, Donna L. 1986. “Mary Richmond and Jane Addams: From Moral Certainty to Rational Inquiry in Social Work Practice.” Social Service Review 60(4):504-525.
• Gouhier, Henri. 1933-1941. La Jeunesse d’Auguste Comte et la formation du positivisme, 3 volumes. Paris: Vrin.
• Harvey, Lee. 1982. “The Use and Abuse of Kuhnian Paradigms in the Sociology of Knowledge.” Journal of the British Sociological Association 16(1):85-101.
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Linn, James Weber. 1935. Jane Addams: A Biography. New York, London: D. Appleton-Century.
• Long, Norman. 1990. “From Paradigm Lost to Paradise Regained? The Case for an Actor-Oriented Sociology of Development.” European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 49:3-24.
• Lubove, Roy. 1965. The Professional Altruist: The Emergence of Social Work as a Career 1880-1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Misheva, Vessela. 2018. “Jane Addams and the Birth of Sociology as a Science and a Social Enterprise.” Pp. 219-274 in Jane Addams’ Sociology and the Spirit of Social Entrepreneurship, edited by Vessela Misheva and Andrew Blasko. Uppsala: Uppsala University, Studia Sociological Upsaliensia 65.
• Misheva, Vessela. 2019. “Lost in Vicissitudes of Greatness and Decline: Charles Horton Cooley’s Unique Contribution to Sociology.” Pp. 37-73 in Updating Charles H. Cooley. Contemporary Perspectives on a Sociological Classic, edited by Natalia Ruiz-Junco and Baptiste Brossard. London: Routledge.
• Parsons, Talcott. 1968a. “Cooley and the Problem of Internalization.” Pp. 48-67 in Cooley and Sociological Analysis, edited by Albert J. Reiss. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Parsons, Talcott. 1968b. “Introduction to the Paperback Edition.” Pp. v-xiv in Talcott Parsons, The Structure of Social Action, vol. II. New York: Free Press.
• Pickering, Mary. 1993. “Auguste Comte and the Saint-Simonians.” French Historical Studies 18(1):211-236.
• Ritzer, George. 1975. “Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science.” The American Sociologist 10(3):156-167.
• Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 2010. “Cultural Contradictions: Jane Addams’s Struggles with the Life of Art and the Art of Life.” Pp. 55-79 in Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams, edited by Maurice Hamington. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
• Stebner, Eleanor J. 2010. “The Theology of Jane Addams: Religion Seeking Its Own Adjustment.” Pp. 201-222 in Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams, edited by Maurice Hamington. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
• Turner, Jonathan, Leonard Beeghley, and Charles H. Powers. 2007. The Emergence of Sociological Theory. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
• Turner, Stephen Park and Jonathan H. Turner. 1990. The Impossible Science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1733-8077.15.2.14