Meetings or Power Weeks? Boundary Work in a Transnational Police Project

• Authors: Malin Åkerström , David Wästerfors , Sophia Yakhlef
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Meetings are common in contemporary working life, but they are often overlooked in academic studies and sometimes defined as empty or boring by employees. Yet, the meeting society is being reproduced again and again. There seem to be hidden ways to incorporate meetings into today’s working life without arousing critique about pointless activities and deviations from what should really be done. One strategy was illustrated in a study of a transnational police project. Police culture celebrates visible crime fighting, which is associated with action, physical toughness, and capturing criminals. The police officers involved in the project emphasized the need to avoid “a lot of meetings,” but de facto constructed their project as meetings. Nonetheless, the project was declared a success. We analyze this paradox in terms of boundary work concerning meetings; the police officers turned some meetings into “real police work” by discursively and practically removing them from the category of bureaucracy and its associations with formalities, rigidity, and documentation. The most important example is how an “operational action group meeting” was renamed “power weeks,” eradicating the very word “meeting” from the term. This was closely associated with increased informality and multi-tasking during these gatherings.

Keywords

EN

Occupational Culture; Identity; Meetings; Border Police; Project; Bureaucracy

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Qualitative Sociology Review
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 16
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 70-84

Dates

published

2020-08-07

Contributors

author

Malin Åkerström

• Lund University, Sweden

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9780-7569

author

David Wästerfors

• Lund University, Sweden

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6271-5659

author

Sophia Yakhlef

• Lund University, Sweden

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2189-1928

References

• Åkerström, Malin. 2011. “Slaps, Punches, Pinches-But Not Violence: Boundary Work in Nursing Homes for the Elderly.” Symbolic Interaction 25(4):515-536.
• Åkerström, Malin. 2018. “The Merry-Go-Round of Meetings: Embracing Meetings in a Youth Care Project.” Sociological Focus 52(1):50-64.
• Allen, Davina. 2001. “Narrating Nursing Jurisdiction: Atrocity Stories and Boundary-Work.” Symbolic Interaction 24(1):75-103.
• Allen, Joseph, Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, and Steven Rogelberg, (eds.). 2015. The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Andersson, Cederholm E. 2010. “Effective Emotions: The Enactment of a Work Ethic in the Swedish Meeting Industry.” Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research 2:381-400.
• Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca and Sandra Harris. 1997. Managing Language: The Discourse of Corporate Meetings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Chan, Janet. 1997. Changing Police Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Colombeau, Sara C. 2015. “Policing the Internal Schengen Borders-Managing the Double Bind between Free Movement and Migration Control.” An International Journal of Research and Policy 27(5):480-493.
• Darden, Donna and Alan Marks. 1999. “Boredom: A Socially Disvalued Emotion.” Sociological Spectrum 19:13-37.
• Emerson, Robert M., Rachel Fretz, and Linda Shaw. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Emerson, Robert M. and Melvin Pollner. 1976. “Dirty Work Designations: Their Features and Consequences in a Psychiatric Setting.” Social Problems 23(3):243-254.
• Fangen, Katrine. 2005. Deltagande observation [Participant Observation]. Malmo: Liber.
• Gieryn, Thomas. 1995. “Boundaries of Science.” Pp. 393-443 in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by S. Jasanoff. London: Sage.
• Hage, Ghassan. 2005. “A Not So Multi-Sited Ethnography of a Not So Imagined Community.” Anthropological Theory 5(4):463-475.
• Hall, Patrik. 2012. Managementbyråkrati [Management Bureaucracy]. Malmo: Liber.
• Hall, Patrik, Vesa Leppänen, and Malin Åkerström. 2019. Mötesboken [The Meeting Book]. Malmo: Egalité.
• Holstein, James and Jaber Gubrium. 1995. The Active Interview. London: Sage
• Kello, John. 2015. “The Science and Practice of Workplace Meetings.” Pp. 709-734 in The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science, edited by J. Allen et al. New York: Cambridge University Press
• Kleinman, Lisa. 2010. Technology Multitasking in Organizational Meetings. PhD Dissertation, Texas University, Department of Information.
• Lamont, Michèle and Virág Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28:167-195.
• Loftus, Bethan. 2010. “Police Occupational Culture: Classic Themes, Altered Times.” Policing and Society 20(1):1-20.
• Loftus, Behtan. 2013. “Border Regimes and the Sociology of Policing.” An International Journal of Research and Policy 25(1):115-125.
• Mahmood, Qaisar. 2017. “En gravallvarlig figur i demokratins tjänst [A Solemn Figure in the Service of Democracy].” Fokus 45:42.
• Manning, Peter. 2007. “A Dialectic of Organizational and Occupational Culture.” Pp. 47-83 in Police Occupational Culture, edited by M. O’Neill, M. Marks, and A.-M. Singh. Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI Press.
• Packendorff, Johann and Monika Lindgren. 2014. “Projectification and Its Consequences.” South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 171:7-21.
• Reiner, Robert. 1985. The Politics of the Police. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
• Reuss-Ianni, Elizabeth. 2011. Two Cultures of Policing: Street Cops and Management Cops. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
• Schwartzman, Helen. 1989. The Meeting: Gatherings in Organizations and Communities. New York: Springer Science.
• Smith, Dorothy. 1978. “K is Mentally Ill. The Anatomy of a Factual Account.” Sociology 12(1):23-53.
• Thedvall, Renita. 2006. Eurocrats at Work. Negotiating Transparency in Postnational Employment Policy. PhD Dissertation, Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology, 58, Stockholm University.
• Thelander, Joakim and Malin Åkerström. 2019. “Ruled by the Calendar? Public Sector and University Managers on Meetings, Calendars and Time.” Sociologisk Forskning 56(2):149-165.
• Thorne, Barrie. 1999. Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Uhnoo, Sara. 2011. Våldets regler [Rules of Violence]. Goteborg: daidalos.
• Van Vree, Wilbert. 1999. Meetings, Manners and Civilization: The Development of Modern Meeting Behaviour. London: Leicester University Press.
• Van Vree, Wilbert. 2011. “Meetings: The Frontline of Civilization.” The Sociological Review 59(1):241-262.
• Vaughn, Diane. 2015. “Theorizing: Analogy, Cases, and Comparative Social Organization.” In Theorizing in Social Science, edited by R. Swedberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Wasson, Christina. 2006. “Being at Two Spaces at Once: Virtual Meetings and Their Representation.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 16(1):103-130.
• Yahklef, Sophia. 2018. United Agents. Community of Practice within Border Policing in the Baltic Sea Area. Dissertation Series 119, Lund University, Department of Sociology.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1733-8077.16.3.05