Reframing Patient’s Autonomy in End-of-Life Care Decision-Making: Constructions of Agency in Interviews with Physicians

• Authors: André Buscariolli , Kari Mikko Vesala
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In the research literature, critical viewpoints question the idea of patient autonomy as a robust basis for approaching end-of-life treatments. Yet physicians express distinctly positive attitudes towards patient autonomy and advance directives in questionnaire studies. In this article, we unravel taken-for-granted assumptions about the agency that physicians use when evaluating patient autonomy in end-of-life care. We use Goffmanian frame analysis to analyze semi-structured interviews with eight Finnish physicians. Instead of measuring standardized responses, we explore in detail how distinct evaluations of patient autonomy are made through approving or reserved stand-taking. The results show that the interviewees reframed patient autonomy with the help of biological, medical, ethical, and interaction frames. Through such reframing, the patient’s agency was constructed as vulnerable and weak in contrast to the medical expert with the legitimated capacity to act as an agent for the patient. Further, end-of-life treatment decisions by the patient, as well as the patient’s interests appeared as relationally defined in interactions and negotiations managed by the physician, instead of attesting the sovereign agency of an autonomous actor.

Keywords

EN

Advance Directives; Patient’s Autonomy; Bioethics; Frame Analysis; Agency; End-of-Life Care; Finland

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Qualitative Sociology Review
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 70-87

Dates

published

2021-04-30

Contributors

author

André Buscariolli

• University of California, Santa Barbara, USA

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7336-2972

author

Kari Mikko Vesala

• University of Helsinki, Finland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1764-9052

References

• Andorno, Roberto, Nikola Biller-Andorno, and Susanne Brauer. 2009. “Advance Health Care Directives: Towards a Coordinated European Policy?” European Journal of Health Law 16(3):207-227.
• Andreasen, Paula et al. 2019. “Advance Directives in European Long-Term Care Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Survey.” BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. Retrieved February 17, 2021 https://spcare.bmj.com/content/early/2019/05/21/bmjspcare-2018-001743
• Auriemma, Catherine L. et al. 2014. “Stability of End-of-Life Preferences: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.” JAMA Internal Medicine 174(7):1085-1092.
• Bandura, Albert. 2006. “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1(2):164-180.
• Billig, Michael. 1996. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Clarke, Adele E. et al. 2003. “Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and U.S. Biomedicine.” American Sociological Review 68(2):161-194.
• Coleman, Albert M. E. 2013. “Physician Attitudes toward Advanced Directives: A Literature Review of Variables Impacting on Physicians Attitude toward Advance Directives.” American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine 30(7):696-706.
• Conrad, Peter. 1979. “Types of Medical Social Control.” Sociology of Health & Illness 1(1):1-11.
• Conrad, Peter. 1992. “Medicalization and Social Control.” Annual Review of Sociology 18:209-232.
• Conrad, Peter and Joseph W. Schneider. 1980. “Looking at Level of Medicalization: A Comment on Strong’s Critique of the Thesis of Medical Imperialism.” Social Science & Medicine. Part A: Medical Psychology & Medical Sociology 14(1):75-79.
• Ditto, Peter. H., Nikki A. Hawkins, and David A. Pizarro. 2006. “Imagining the End of Life: On the Psychology of Advance Medical Decision Making.” Motivation and Emotion 29(4):475-496.
• Dresser, Rebecca S. 2003. “Precommitment: A Misguided Strategy for Securing Death with Dignity.” Texas Law Review 81(7):1823-1847.
• Eberly, Marion B. et al. 2011. “Beyond Internal and External: A Dyadic Theory of Relational Attributions.” Academy of Management Review 36(4):731-753.
• Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103(2):281-317.
• Emirbayer, Mustafa and Ann Mische. 1998. “What Is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103(4):962-1023.
• Ensink, Titus. 2003. “The Frame Analysis of Research Interviews: Social Categorization and Footing in Interview Discourse.” Pp 156-177 in Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview, edited by H. van der Berg, M. Wetherell, and H. Houtkoop-Steensrta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Fagerlin, Angela and Carl E. Schneider. 2004. “Enough. The Failure of the Living Will.” Hasting Center Report 34(2):30-41.
• Finnish Social Science Data Archive. 2016. Processing Qualitative Data Files. Retrieved January 21, 2017 http://www.fsd.uta.fi/aineistonhallinta/en/processing-qualitative-data-files.html
• Frank, Gelya et al. 1998. “A Discourse on Relationships in Bioethics: Patient Autonomy and End-of-Life Decision Making Among Elderly Korean Americans.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 12(4):403-423.
• Freidson, Eliot L. 1970. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company.
• Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Goffman, Erving. 1986. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
• Hawkins, Nikki A. et al. 2005. “Micromanaging Death: Process, Preferences, Values, and Goals in End-of-Life Care Medical Decision Making.” The Gerontologist 45(1):107-117.
• Hildén, Hanna-Mari, Pekka Louhiala, and Jorma Palo. 2004. “End of Life Decisions: Attitudes of Finnish Physicians.” Journal of Medical Ethics 30(4):362-365.
• Kiesler, Donald J. and Stephen M. Auerbach. 2006. “Optimal Matches of Patient Preferences for Information, Decision-Making and Interpersonal Behavior: Evidence, Models and Interventions.” Patient Education and Counseling 61(3):319-341.
• Kuczewski, Mark G. 1996. “Reconceiving the Family: The Process of Consent in Medical Decision-Making.” The Hasting Center Report 26(2):30-37.
• Laine, Christine and Frank Davidoff. 1996. “Patient-Centered Medicine: A Professional Evolution.” JAMA 275(2):152-156.
• Légaré, France et al. 2010. “Interventions for Improving the Adoption of Shared Decision Making by Healthcare Professionals.” Cochrane Systematic Review 12(5):CD006732.
• Lidz, Charles W. and Robert M. Arnold. 1993. “Rethinking Autonomy in Long Term Care.” University of Miami Law Review 47(3):603-623.
• Lopéz, José. 2004. “How Sociology Can Save Bioethics… Maybe.” Sociology of Health & Illness 26(7):875-896.
• Manning, Philip. 1992. Erving Goffman and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Meyer, John W. and Ronald L. Jepperson. 2000. “The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.” Sociological Theory 18(1):100-120.
• Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland. 1992. The Act on the Status and Rights of Patients. Retrieved August 24, 2019 https://www.valvira.fi/web/en/healthcare/patient_rights
• Niska, Miira. 2015. Who Is Serving Whom? An Agency-for Perspective on Enterprise Promotion in Rural Finland. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
• Pesonen, Heikki and Kari M. Vesala. 2007. “Rural Development as a Frame Analytic Challenge for Religious Communities: The Case of Rural Parishes of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland.” Social Compass 54(2):281-293.
• Pollard, Lorraine et al. 2014. “The Impact of Patient Participation Direct Enhanced Service on Patient Reference Groups in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.” Quality in Primary Care 22(4):189-199.
• Pyysiäinen, Jarkko. 2010. “Co-Constructing a Virtuous Ingroup Attitude? Evaluation of New Business Activities in a Group Interview of Farmers.” Text & Talk. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 30(6):701-721.
• Rose, Nikolas. 2013. “Personalized Medicine: Promises, Problems and Perils of a New Paradigm for Healthcare.” Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences 77:341-352.
• Ross, Lee. 1977. “The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 10(C):173-220.
• Scheff, Thomas. 2005. “Deciphering ‘Frame Analysis.’” Sociological Theory 23(4):368-385.
• Shapiro, Susan P. 2015. “Do Advance Directives Direct?” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 40(3):487-530.
• Shapiro, Susan P. 2018. “Standing in Another’s Shoes: How Agents Make Life-and-Death Decisions for Their Principals.” Academy of Management Perspectives 30(4):404-427.
• Sharman, Stefanie J. et al. 2008. “False Memories for End-of-Life Decisions.” Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 27(2):291-296.
• Sharron, Avery. 1981. “Frame Paralysis: When Time Stands Still.” Social Research 48(3):500-520.
• Stock, Paul V. and Jérémie Forney. 2014. “Farmer Autonomy and the Farming Self.” Journal of Rural Studies 36:160-171.
• Tannen, Deborah. 1993. Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Tannen, Deborah and Cynthia Wallat. 1987. “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2):205-216.
• Timmermans, Stefan. 2005. “Death Brokering: Constructing Culturally Appropriate Deaths.” Sociology of Health and Illness 27(7):993-1013.
• Vesala, Kari M., Alistair R. Anderson, and Hannu T. Vesala. 2017. “Interactions and Entrepreneurial Agency. A Relational View of Entrepreneurs’ Control Cognitions.” Archives of Psychology 1 (1). Retrieved March 27, 2019 https://archivesofpsychology.org/index.php/aop/article/view/11/28

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1733-8077.17.2.04