Axiological entanglement of economics

• Authors: Bożena Klimczak
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In mainstream economics, the principle of freedom from value judgment (Wertfreiheit) is enforced. This principle has different interpretations. The aim of this paper is to present the author’s interpretations of the principle of Wertfreiheit. The basic ideas of axiology have been analysed: values, valuations, and value judgments, including their application to economic activities and economic researches. Two models of valuations have been presented-the taste model and perception model-as well as points of view of economic researches on those models. The conclusion comprises the author’s interpretation of the principle of Wertfreiheit as that of impartiality and integrity in research activities.

Keywords

EN

Wertfreiheit postulate; value; valuation; taste model; perception model

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 20
• Issue: 5
• Pages: 33-44

Dates

published

2019-02-12

Contributors

author

Bożena Klimczak

• Wrocław University of Economics, Faculty of Economic Sciences

References

• Andreski, S. (1992). Maxa Webera olśnienia i pomyłki. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Aristotle. (1983). Metaphysics. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Augustine. (1977). The city of God. Warsaw: Pax.
• Descartes, R. (2001). Principles of philosophy. Kęty: Antyk.
• Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in Positive Economics (pp. 3–34). University of Chicago Press.
• Griffin, J. (2000). Value judgement: improving our ethical beliefs. Warsaw: Fundacja Aletheia.
• Hobbes, T. (1954). Leviathan. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Hume, D. (1963). A treatise of human nature. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Hutchison, T. W. (1964). Types and sources of value-judgements and bias. In “Positive” economics and policy objectives. London: Allen & Unwin.
• Kant, I. (1986). Critique of judgment. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Keynes, J. N. (1955). The scope and method of political economy. New York: Augustus Kelley.
• Klimczak, B. (2014). Aksjologiczne uwikłanie ekonomii. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 17(1), 9–21
• Machlup, F. (1969). Positive and normative economics: An analysis of ideas. In Economic means and social ends. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
• Mandeville, B. (1957). The fable of the bees. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Mill, J. S. (1936/1955). Essays on some unsettled questions of political economy. London: Kelley and MacMillan.
• Mill, J. S. (1962). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive (Cz. Znamierowski, Trans.). Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Mill, J. S. (1965). Principles of political economy. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Myrdal, G. (1958). Value in social theory: A selection of essays on methodology. London: Routledge & K. Paul.
• Platon. (2010). Euthypro. In Symposium, Politicus, Sophist, Euthypro (pp. 321–345). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Popper, K. R. (1977). The logic of scientific discovery. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Popper, K. R. (1992). Objective knowledge. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Popper, K. R. (1999). The poverty of historicism. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (2006). History of economic analysis. London: Routledge.
• Thomas Aquinas. (1967). Summa Theologica. London: Katolicki Ośrodek Wydawniczy Veritas.
• Weber, M. (1957). A sense of value-free sociology and economy. In Problems of a Sociology of Knowledge. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1899-2226.20.5.03