Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 20 | 6 | 69-86

Article title

Economic process as institutionalization of values. Karl Polanyi’s institutional theory and its ethical consequences

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
This article is devoted to a critical reconstruction of Karl Polanyi’s institutional theory and its ethical consequences. Starting with the distinction between the formal (neoclassical) and the substantive (institutional) understanding of the economy, the article proceeds to discuss the main forms of institutional integration of economic life described by Polanyi: reciprocity (symmetry), redistribution (centricity), and exchange (market). In this context, the author examines the connection between the work of Karl Polanyi and the economic anthropology represented by the works of Richard Thurnwald and Bronisław Malinowski. The author argues that three main forms of institutional integration of economic life introduced by Karl Polanyi can be interpreted both as analytical tools to describe institutions and as a grand scheme for the classification of different economic systems. The next section of the article is devoted to a comparison between the institutional theories of Douglass North and Karl Polanyi. For North, the main explanatory category is the idea of transaction costs, whereas for Polanyi the key idea is that of the social embeddedness of the economy. When speaking about the social embeddedness of the economy, Polanyi draws our attention to the inseparable bonds which exist between economic institutions on the one hand, and culture, social structure and politics on the other. This theoretical difference between North and Polanyi, the author argues, has important ethical consequences. If Polanyi is right, then institutions are not only alternative solutions to a certain economic problem (i.e. the efficient allocation of resources, the reduction of transaction costs) but above all they are the embodiment of different conceptions of a good life. In conclusion, the author emphasizes the political dimension of Karl Polanyi’s institutional theory, along with its intriguing promise of liberating our social and political life from the economistic fallacy, that is, from the unfortunate tendency to think about society in market terms.

Year

Volume

20

Issue

6

Pages

69-86

Physical description

Dates

published
2019-02-22

Contributors

  • Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Humanities, Institute of Philosophy

References

  • Becker, G. S. (1990). Ekonomiczna teoria zachowań ludzkich. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  • Beckert, J. (2011). The great transformation of embeddedness: Karl Polanyi and the New Economic Sociology. In Ch. Hann, & K. Hart (Eds.), Market and society. The Great Transformation today. Cambridge University Press.
  • Blyth, M. (2003). Structures do not come with an instruction sheet: Interests, ideas, and progress in political science. Perspectives on Politics, 1(4), 695–706.
  • Burga, A., & Agartan, K. (Eds.) (2007). Reading Karl Polanyi for twenty-first century: Market economy as a political project. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cangiani, M. (2011). Karl Polanyi’s institutional theory: Market society and it’s disembedded economy. Journal of Economic Issues, 45(1), 177–197.
  • Chang, H. (2015). Ekonomia. Instrukcja obsługi. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
  • Dale, G. (2010). Karl Polanyi. The limits of the market. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
  • Denzau, A, & North, D. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, 47(1), 3–31.
  • Gemici, K. (2008). Karl Polanyi and the antinomies of embeddedness. Socio-Economic Review, 6(1), 5–33.
  • Gregory, Ch. (2011). Whatever happened to householding. In Ch. Hann, & K. Hart (Eds.), Market and society. The Great Transformation today. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hann, Ch., & Hart, K. (2011). Economic anthropology. History, ethnography, critique. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
  • Hann, Ch. & Hart, K. (Eds.). (2011). Market and society. The Great Transformation today. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kapp, K. W. (1965). Social economics and social welfare minima. In T. K. N. Unnithan et al. (Eds.), Towards a sociology of culture in India. Essays in honor of Dr.D. P. Mukerji. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.
  • Kassner, M. (2017). Gospodarka jako zinstytucjonalizowany proces. Instytucjonalizm Karla Polanyiego i jego etyczne konsekwencje. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 20(2), 45–61.
  • Kostello, E., & Szelényi, I. (1998). Outline of an institutionalist theory of inequality: The case of socialist and postcommunist Eastern Europe. In M. Brinton, & V. Nee (Eds.), The new institutionalism in sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Latouche, S. (2009). Farewell to growth. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Malinowski, B. (1980). Zwyczaj i zbrodnia w społeczności dzikich. In Dzieła (Vol. 2). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  • Maucourant, J., & Plociniczak, S. (2013). The institution, the economy, and the market: Karl Polanyi’s institutional thought for economists. Review of Political Economy, 25(3), 512–531.
  • North, D. (1977). Markets and other allocation systems in history. The challenge of Karl Polanyi. Journal of European Economic History, 6(3), 703–716.
  • North, D. (1978). Review of the livelihood of man by Karl Polanyi. Business History Reviews, 52(3).
  • North, D. (1998). Economic performance through time. In M. Brinton, & V. Nee (Eds.), The new institutionalism in sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Polanyi, K. (1957a). The economy as instituted process. In K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg, & H. W. Pearson (Eds.), Trade and market in early empires. Economies in historyand theory. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
  • Polanyi, K. (1957b). Aristotle discovers economy. In K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg, & H. W. Pearson (Eds.), Trade and market in early empires. Economies in historyand theory. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
  • Polanyi, K. (1966). Dahomey and the slave trade. An analysis of an archaic economy. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.
  • Polanyi, K. (1971). Carl Menger’s two meanings of “Economic”. In G. Dalton (Ed.), Studies in economic anthropology. Washington: American Anthropological Association.
  • Polanyi, K. (1977). Livelihood of man (Ed. H. W. Pearson). New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.
  • Polanyi, K. (2010). Wielka transformacja. Polityczne i ekonomiczne źródła naszych czasów (M. Zawadzka, Trans.). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Polanyi, K. (2014). For a New West. Malden and Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Robbins, L. (1932). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan.
  • Schaniel, W. C., & Neale, W. C. (2000). Karl Polanyi’s forms of integration as ways of mapping. Journal of Economic Issues, 34(1), 89–104.
  • Schmitter, P., & Streeck, W. (1985). Community, market, state – and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. European Sociological Review, 1(2), 119–138.
  • Stanfield, J. R. (1986). The economic thought of Karl Polanyi: Lives and livelihoods. New York: Palgrave, Macmillan.
  • Szelényi, I. (1991). Karl Polanyi and the theory of a socialist mixed economy. In M. Mendell, & D. Salée (Eds.), The legacy of Karl Polanyi. Market, state and society at theend of twentieth century. New York: St. Martin Press.
  • Thurnwald, R. (1916). Bánaro Society. Social organization and kinship system of a tribe in the interior of New Guinea. Memories of the American Anthropological Association, 3(4).
  • Titmuss, R. M. (1971). The gift relationship. From human blood to social policy. New York: Pantheon Books.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18778_1899-2226_20_6_05
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.