The limits of moral responsibility for global poverty

• Authors: Tomasz Kwarciński
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Most people, especially in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, suffer and die from lack of food, shelter, and medical care, whereas other people in rich countries are extremely well-off. Because of the globalization process neither individuals nor governments can claim to be unaware of what is happening in the Third World. In this paper I defend the claim that, since we are living in a “global village”, we have greater moral responsibility for poverty. Thus, our moral responsibility is less limited than it usually seems to be. However, we do not have to be extremely impartial, which is recommended by utilitarianism (Garrett Hardin, Peter Singer), concentrating only on the consequences of action and its utility (agent-neutral evaluation). Yet, what we can include in our moral evaluation of poverty are human rights and an individual point of view, which are defended by Amartya Sen’s capability approach and Thomist framework (agent-relative evaluation).

Keywords

EN

global poverty; moral responsibility; utilitarianism; capability approach

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 20
• Issue: 6
• Pages: 133-145

Dates

published

2019-02-22

Contributors

author

Tomasz Kwarciński

• Cracow University of Economics, Faculty of Public Economy and Administration, Department of Philosophy

References

• Bauman, Z. (2000). Globalizacja. I co z tego dla ludzi wynika (E. Klekot, Trans.). Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
• Chyrowicz, B. (1997). Zamiar i skutki. Filozoficzna analiza zasady podwójnego skutku. Lublin: TN KUL.
• Chyrowicz, B. (2004). “Moralni święci”. Czy istnieje obowiązek spełniania czynów supererogacyjnych? In B. Chyrowicz (Ed.), Etyka i technika. W poszukiwaniu ludzkiej doskonałości. Lublin: TN KUL.
• Crocker, D. A. (1998). Development ethics. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Vol. 3). London and New York: Routledge.
• Gabriel, I. (2017). Effective altruism and its critics. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34(4), 457–473.
• Galbraith, J. K. (1987). Istota masowego ubóstwa (W. Rączkowska, Trans.). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Hardin, G. (1974, September 8). Lifeboat ethics: The case against helping the poor. Psychology Today, 38–43.
• Kekes, J. (1984). ‘Ought implies can’ and two kinds of morality. The Philosophical Quarterly, 34(137), 459–467.
• Kwarciński, T. (2006). Granice moralnej odpowiedzialności za problem światowego ubóstwa. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 9(1), 233–244.
• Kwarciński, T. (2006). Komu pomóc w pierwszej kolejności. Decyzje dotyczące udzielania pomocy ubogim w świetle Amartyi K. Sena badań nad ubóstwem. Prakseologia, 146, 31–51.
• Moyo, D. (2009). Dead aid: Why aid makes things worse and how there is another way for Africa. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Sachs, J. D. (2005, March 14). The end of poverty. The Time, 45–54.
• Sen, A. (1982). Poverty and famines. An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sen, A. (1982). Rights and agency. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 11, 19–39.
• Sen, A. (1999). On ethics and economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Sen, A. (2000). Consequential evaluation and practical reason. The Journal of Philosophy, 9, 477–502.
• Sen, A. (2002). Rozwój i wolność (J. Łoziński, Trans.). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.
• Singer, P. (1999). Practical ethics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press [Polish trans. (2003) Etyka praktyczna (A. Sagan, Trans.). Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza].
• Singer, P. (2002). Famine, affluence, and morality. In H. Kuhse (Ed.), Unsanctifying Human Life. Essays on Ethics Peter Singer. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
• Singer, P. (2015). The most good you can do: How effective altruism is changing ideas about living ethically. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
• Skelton, A. (2016). The ethical principles of effective altruism. Journal of Global Ethics, 12(2), 137–146.
• Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. [Polish trans.: Globalizacja (H. Simbierowicz, Trans.). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN].
• Ślipko, T. (2005). Zarys etyki szczegółowej (Vol. 1). Kraków: WAM.
• UNDP (2016). Raport o rozwoju społecznym. Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone.
• Unger, P. (1996). Living high and letting die. Our illusion of innocence. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• World Bank (2016). Poverty and Shared Responsibility 2016: Taking on Inequality.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1899-2226.20.6.10