Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 24 | 39 | 71-85

Article title

Horrible Imaginings: Jan Kott, the Grotesque, and “Macbeth, Macbeth”

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Throughout Jan Kott’s Shakespeare Our Contemporary, a keyword for the combination of philosophical, aesthetic and modern qualities in Shakespearean drama is “grotesque.” This term is also relevant to other influential studies of early-modern drama, notably Mikhail Bakhtin’s idea of the carnivalesque, as well as Wolfgang Kayser’s psychoanalytic criticism. Yet if this tradition of the Shakespearean grotesque has problematized an idea of the human and of humanist values in literature, can this also be understood in posthuman terms? This paper proposes a reading of Kott’s criticism of the grotesque to suggest where it indicates a potential interrogation of the human and posthuman in Shakespeare, especially at points where the ideas of the grotesque or absurdity indicate other ideas of causation, agency or affect, such as the “grand mechanism” It will then argue for the continuing relevance of Kott’s work by examining a recent work of Shakespearean adaptation as appropriation, the 2016 novel Macbeth, Macbeth by Ewan Fernie and Simon Palfrey which attempts a provocative and transgressive retelling of Macbeth that imagines a ‘sequel’ to the play that emphasises ideas of violence and ethics. The paper argues that this creative intervention should be best understood as a continuation of Kott’s idea of the grotesque in Shakespeare, but from the vantage point of the twenty-first century in which the grotesque can be understood as the modification or even disappearance of the human. Overall, it is intended to show how the reconsideration of the grotesque may elaborate questions of being and subjectivity in our contemporary moment just as Kott’s study reflected his position in the Cold War.

Year

Volume

24

Issue

39

Pages

71-85

Physical description

Dates

published
2021

Contributors

author
  • Tohoku University, Japan

References

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Helene Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.
  • Bristol, Michael D. Carnival and Theater: Plebeian Culture and the Structure of Authority in Renaissance England. New York: Methuen, 1985.
  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
  • Chaudhuri, Sukanta, ed. A Midsummer Night’s Dream. By William Shakespeare. Arden Third Series. London: Bloomsbury, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1017/S2753906700002102
  • Clarke, Bruce. “The Nonhuman.” The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman. Eds. Bruce Clarke & Manuela Rossini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. 141-52.
  • Clayborough, Arthur. The Grotesque in English Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.
  • Colebrook, Clare. “Futures.” The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman. Eds. Bruce Clarke & Manuela Rossini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. 196-208.
  • Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx: The State of Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. (1994) Trans. Peggy Kamuf. London: Routledge, 2006.
  • Dostoevsky, Fyodor. The Karamazov Brothers. Trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
  • Edwards, Justin D & Runa Graulund. Grotesque. London: Routledge, 2013 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203383438
  • Esslin, Martin. The Theatre of the Absurd. New York: Anchor, 1969.
  • Farnham, Willard. The Shakespearean Grotesque: Its Genesis and Transformations. Oxford: Clarendon, 1971.
  • Fernie, Ewan. The Demonic: Literature and Experience. London: Routledge, 2013 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203082300
  • Fernie, Ewan & Simon Palfrey. Macbeth, Macbeth, London: Bloomsbury, 2016.
  • Fisher, Mark. The Weird and the Eerie. London: Repeater, 2016.
  • Fuller, David. Shakespeare and the Romantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
  • Garner, Marjorie. Shakespeare and Modern Culture. New York: Pantheon Books, 2008.
  • Greenblatt, Stephen and Peter G. Platt, eds. Shakespeare’s Montaigne: The Florio Translations of The Essays. New York: New York Review Books, 2014.
  • Harpham, Geoffrey Galt. On the Grotesque: Strategies of Contradiction in Art and Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.
  • Hegel, G.W.F. Introductory Lectures on Aesthetics. Translated by Bernard Bosanquet. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1993.
  • Houston Wood, David. “New Directions: ‘Some tardy cripple’: Timing Disability in Richard III.” Richard III: A Critical Reader. Ed. Annaliese Connolly. London: Bloomsbury, 2013. 129-54.
  • Jonson, Ben. “Discoveries.” The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson. Ed. David Bevington et.al. Vol. 7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 481-596.
  • Jowett, John, ed. The Tragedy of Richard III. By William Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • Kayser, Wolfgang. The Grotesque in Art and Literature. (1957) Trans. Ulrich Weisstein. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1963.
  • Kott, Jan. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. (1964) Trans. Boreslaw Taborski. New York: Norton, 1974.
  • Kott, Jan. The Bottom Translation: Marlowe and Shakespeare and the Carnival Tradition. Trans. Daniela Miedzyrzecka & Lillian Vallee. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1987.
  • Meillassoux, Quentin. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Trans. Ray Brassier. London: Bloomsbury, 2008.
  • Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1017/S2753906700003636
  • Rhodes, Neil. The Elizabethan Grotesque. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.
  • Ryan, Kiernan. Shakespeare’s Universality: Here’s Fine Revolution. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.
  • Sanders, Julie. Adaptation and Appropriation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2016 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315737942
  • Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Eds. Ann Thompson & Neil Taylor. Arden Third Series. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.
  • Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Eds. Sandra Clark & Pamela Mason. Arden Third Series. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.
  • Sinfield, Alan. “Royal Shakespeare: theatre and the making of ideology.” Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism. Eds. Jonathan Dollimore & Alan Sinfield. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985. 158-81.
  • Stott, Andrew. Comedy. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2014 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203795897
  • Taylor, Michael. Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  • Thomson, Philip. The Grotesque. London: Methuen, 1972.
  • Wilson Knight, G. The Wheel of Fire: Essays in Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Sombre Tragedies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1930.
  • Wolfreys, Julian. Derrida: A Guide to the Perplexed. London: Continuum, 2007.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2048126

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18778_2083-8530_24_05
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.