Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 24 | 39 | 105-119

Article title

“Forward and Backward”: Actants and Agency in Marlowe’s “Doctor Faustus” and Shakespeare’s “The Tempest”

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
This essay presents a posthumanist reading of Shakespeare’s The Tempest and Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus, two plays which feature a scientist/magus who attempts to control his environment through personal agency. After detailing the analogy between the agency of posthuman figures and the workings of computerized writing machines, as Katherine Hayles has proposed, my essay shows how Kott’s writing, especially his notion of the “Grand Mechanism” of history, anticipates the posthumanist theories that are currently dominating literary assessments. His critique of The Tempest makes this idea perfectly clear when he disputes the standard notion that Prospero represents a medieval magus; he instead argues that Prospero was more akin to Leonardo DaVinci, “a master of mechanics and hydraulics,” one who would have embraced revolutionary advances in “astronomy” as well as “anatomy” (1974: 321).

Year

Volume

24

Issue

39

Pages

105-119

Physical description

Dates

published
2021

Contributors

author
  • East Tennessee State University, USA

References

  • Aristotle. The Complete Works. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. 2 Vols. Princeton U.P., 1995.
  • Belsey, Catherine. The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama. 1985. 2nd ed. London, Methuen, 1995.
  • Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham NC. Duke University Press, 2010.
  • Bevington, David and Eric Rasmussen, eds. Doctor Faustus: the A- and B-Texts (1604, 1616), Christopher Marlowe and His Collaborator and Revisers, by Christopher Marlowe, Revels Plays Manchester and New York: Manchester Univ. Press, 1992.
  • Campana, Joseph and Scott Maisano, eds. Renaissance Posthumanism. New York: Fordham P, 2016.
  • Chow, Rey. Entanglements, or Transmedial Thinking about Capture. Duke U.P., 2012 https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395263
  • Desmet, Christy. “Alien Shakespeares 2.0.” Actes des congrès de la Sociètè française Shakespeare (online 2017): 1-19.
  • Egan, Gabriel. Green Shakespeares: From Ecopolitics to Ecocriticism. New York: Routledge, 2006.
  • Greimas, Algirdas Julien and Joseph Courtés. Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary. 1982.
  • Haraway, Donna. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Others. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.
  • Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman. Chicago: U. of Chicago P., 1999 https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001
  • Hayles, N. Katherine. “Unfinished Work: From Cyborg to Cognisphere.” Theory, Culture & Society 23(7-8): 159-166. 2006 https://doi.org/10.1093/litimag/8.1.159
  • Hayles, N. Katherine. Writing Machines. MIT press. 2002.
  • Kott, Jan. Shakespeare our Contemporary. Trans. Boleslaw Taborski. New York: W.W. Norton, 1974.
  • Kott, Jan. “The Aeneid and The Tempest.” Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics. New Series 3.4 (1976): 424-451.
  • Kott, Jan, and Daniela Miedzyrzecka. “The Tempest, or Repetition.” Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal 10.3 (Spring 1977): 9-36.
  • Kunat, John. “Play me False”: Rape, Race and Conquest in The Tempest.” Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 65.3: (2014): 307-327 https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2014.0036
  • LaGrandeur, Kevin. “Early Modern.” Literature and the Posthuman. Ed. Bruce Clarke and Manuela Rossini. Cambridge UP, 2017. 16-28.
  • Latour, Bruno. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2004.
  • Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford UP, 2005.
  • Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993.
  • Lupton, Julia Reinhard. “Creature Caliban.” Shakespeare Quarterly 51 (2000): 1-23 https://doi.org/10.2307/2902320
  • Marlowe, Christopher. Doctor Faustus: The A- and B-Texts (1604, 1616), Christopher Marlowe and His Collaborator and Revisers, ed. David Bevington and Eric Rasmussen. Revels Plays. Manchester and New York: Manchester UP, 1992.
  • “The Origin of the word Daemon,” http://ei.cs.vt.edu/-history/Daemon.html Accessed 12 August 2021.
  • Oxford English Dictionary. Online http://www.oed.com. Accessed 17 July 2021
  • Raber, Karen. Shakespeare and Posthumanist Theory. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2018.
  • Sawday, Jonathan. Engines of the Imagination: Renaissance Culture and the Rise of the Machine. London: Routledge, 2007.
  • Shakespeare, William. The Tempest. The Arden Shakespeare. Ed. Virginia Mason Vaughan and Alden T. Vaughan. London, 1999.
  • Surrey, Henry Howard. Aeneid of Henry Howard Surrey. Ed. Florence H. Ridley. Berkeley and Los Angeles: U of California Press. 1963.
  • Ubersfeld, Anne. Understanding Theatre. University of Toronto Press, 1999 https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442679023

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2048123

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18778_2083-8530_24_07
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.