Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | 3 | 35 | 53-64

Article title

Selected Cryptocurrency Returns and Capital Gains Tax - Based on the Example of Countries with Varying Degrees of Legal Regulations Concerning Cryptocurrencies

Content

Title variants

PL
Stopy zwrotu z wybranych krytpotwalut a podatek od zysków kapitałwych na przykładzie krajów o różnym stopniu uregulowań prawnych dotyczących kryptowalut

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Cel artykułu/hipoteza: Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przedstawienie wpływu podatku od zysków kapitałowych na zwroty dwóch najpopularniejszych kryptowalut: BITCOIN i Ethereum Classic (ETC). Metodyka: W niniejszym opracowaniu stopy zwrotu z wybranych kryptowalut zostały za-proponowane jako zmienna, na którą mogą wpływać podatki od zysków kapitałowych. Artykuł przedstawia nowe podejście do analizy zagadnień związanych z kryptowalutami. Wyniki/Rezultaty badania: Wyniki pokazują, że dla wybranych krajów (Węgry, Włochy, Polska, USA) istnieje korelacja między stawką podatku od zysków kapitałowych a zwro-tem z ETC. W przypadku BITCON-u jednak takiej relacji nie ma.
EN
The purpose of the article/hypothesis: The purpose of this article is to present the impact of capital gains tax on the returns of the two most popular cryptocurrencies: BITCOIN and Ethereum Classic (ETC). Methodology: In this study, the rates of return on selected cryptocurrencies were proposed as a variable that may be affected by taxes on capital gains. The article presents a new approach to the analysis of issues related to cryptocurrencies. Results of the research: The results show that for selected countries (Hungary, Italy, Poland, the USA) there is a correlation between the tax rate on capital gains and the return on ETC. In the case of BITCON, however, there is no such a relationship.

Year

Volume

3

Issue

35

Pages

53-64

Physical description

Dates

published
2022

Contributors

  • University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology
  • University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business
  • University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business

References

  • Bollen R., 2013, The Legal Status of Online Currencies: Are Bitcoins the Future? „Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice”, pp. 38.
  • Czarnecki J., 2018, Cryptocurrency a financial instrument? A new proposal in the EU https://newtech.law/en/cryptocurrency-a-financial-instrument-a-new-proposal-in-the-eu/ [Accessed 10.04.2021].
  • Directive (EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, and amending Directives 2009/138/EC and 2013/36/EU (Text with EEA relevance) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32018L0843 [Accessed 02.05.2021].
  • Dobosz D., Niziołek A., 2019, Opodatkowanie kryptowalut w Polsce. „Studenckie Prace Prawnicze, Administratywistyczne i Ekonomiczne”, 28, pp. 275–286.
  • ESMA 2019 https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma71-99-1084_advice_on_crypto_assets.pdf [Accessed 22.06.2022].
  • Giudici G., Milne A., Vinogradov D., 2020, Cryptocurrencies: market analysis and perspectives. „Journal of Industrial and Business Economics”, 47(1), pp. 1–18.
  • Haffke L., Fromberger M., Zimmermann P., 2020, Cryptocurrencies and anti-money laundering: the shortcomings of the fifth AML Directive (EU) and how to address them. „Journal of Banking Regulation”, 21(2), pp. 125–138.
  • Härdle W.K., Dautel A.J., Lessmann S., Seow H.V., 2020, Forex exchange rate forecasting using deep recurrent neural networks. „Digital Finance”, 2(1), pp. 69–96.
  • Houben R., Snyers A., 2020, Crypto-assets - Key developments, regulatory concerns and responses, „European Parliament Study” https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2020)648779 [Accessed 08.03.2022]
  • Karisma K., 2022, Comparative Review of the Regulatory Framework of Cryptocurrency in Selected Jurisdictions. „Regulatory Aspects of Artificial Intelligence on Blockchain”, pp. 82–111.
  • Kowalski P., 2015, Taxing Bitcoin transactions under Polish tax law. „Comparative Economic Research”, 18(3), pp. 139–152.
  • Lener R., Furnari S.L., Lorenzotti N., Di Ciommo A., Lener R.A., 2021, The Virtual Currency Regulation Review: Italy, „Lener & Partners and Verteq Capital” https://thelawreviews.co.uk/title/the-virtual-currency-regulation-review/italy [Accessed 15.03.2022].
  • Lyons T., 2018, EU Blockchain Observatory and Forum. In Workshop Report. „Government Services and Digital Identity”, Brussels.
  • Nakamoto S., 2008, Re: Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper. „The Cryptography Mailing List”.
  • OECD Data https://data.oecd.org/ [Accessed 12.01.2020].
  • OECD, 2020, Taxing Virtual Currencies: An Overview Of Tax Treatments And Emerging Tax Policy Issues, „OECD”, Paris https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/taxing-virtual-currencies-an-overview-of-tax-treatments-and-emerging-tax-policy-issues.htm [Accessed 20.02.2022].
  • Ossinger J., Hajric V., 2021, Crypto investors turn to lesser-known tokens after Bitcoin and Ether’s rallies https://fortune.com/2021/08/30/crypto-alternative-cardano-binance-coin-avalanche-bitcoin-ether-price-rally/ [Accessed 20.02.2022]
  • Papadimitriou T., Gogas P., Gkatzoglou F., 2020, The evolution of the cryptocurrencies market: A complex networks approach. „Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics”, 376, pp. 112831.
  • Przyluska-Schmitt J., 2021, Bitcoin – zagadnienia prawno-podatkowe. „Przegląd Prawno-Ekonomiczny”, (4), pp. 115–134. https://doi.org/10.31743/ppe.12731
  • Rainero C., Puddu L., Migliavacca A., Coda R., Modarelli G., 2019, “Bit Standard”- Bitcoin between reality and risks of a “halfway- money”. „African Journal of Busi-ness Management”, 13(7).
  • Ramasastry A., 2014, Bitcoin: If You Can’t Ban It, Should You Regulate It? The Merits of Legalization, „Verdict Justia” https://verdict.justia.com/2014/02/25/bitcoin-cant-ban-regulate [Accessed 20.05.2021].
  • Segendorf B., 2014, What is bitcoin. „Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review”, 2014:2, pp. 2–71.
  • Sobiecki G., 2015, Regulowanie kryptowalut w Polsce i na świecie na przykładzie Bitcoina–status prawny i interpretacja ekonomiczna. „Problemy Zarządzania”, (3/2015 (54), t. 1), pp. 144–163.
  • The Chainalysis, 2020, Crypto Crime Report https://go.chainalysis.com/2020-crypto-crime-report [Accessed 15.02.2021]
  • Tu K.V., Meredith M.W., 2015, Rethinking virtual currency regulation in the bitcoin age. „Washington Law Review”, 90(1), pp. 271–347.
  • Van Eecke P., Haie A.G. 2018, Blockchain and the GDPR: The EU Blockchain Observa-tory Report. “Eur. Data Prot. L. Rev”, 4, pp. 531.
  • Vaselli G., 2019, Italy’s tax treatment of cryptocurrencies: The risks and opportunities. „THE BLOCK Blockchain Technology News”. Available from https://www.blockchaintechnology-news.com/2019/04/italys-tax-treatment-of-cryptocurrencies-the-risks-and-opportunities/ [Accessed 11.02.2020].
  • Verbeek M., 2012, A Guide to Modern Econometrics: KU Leuven and Tilburg University. https://thenigerianprofessionalaccountant.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/modern-econometrics.pdf [Accessed 12.01.2019].
  • Wang Z., Jin H., Dai W., Choo K.K.R., Zou D., 2021, Ethereum smart contract security research: survey and future research opportunities. „Frontiers of Computer Science”, 15(2), pp. 1–18.
  • Włosik K., 2021, Rynek kryptowalut i tokenów z perspektywy inwestycyjnej, Wydawnictwo UEP.
  • Wooldridge J.M., 2005, Fixed-effects and related estimators for correlated random-coefficient and treatment-effect panel data models. „Review of Economics and Statis-tics”, 87(2), pp. 385–390.
  • World Bank Open Data - https://data.worldbank.org/ [Accessed 12.01.2020].

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2121845

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18778_2391-6478_3_35_04
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.