Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 16 | 1 | 35-56

Article title

Dobrostan uczniów uzdolnionych: co mówią badania naukowe? Systematyczny przegląd literatury

Content

Title variants

EN
The Well-Being of Gifted Students: What Does the Research Say? A Systematic Literature Review

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
The purpose of this article is to review recent literature on the subjective well-being of gifted and talented students and to consider its practical implications. Fifteen articles were reviewed, published between 2005 and 2022, and selected according to a systematic protocol from two widely used online databases. The analysis showed that it could not be clearly stated whether giftedness is a risk or a protective factor for gifted and talented children’s and adolescents’ subjective well-being. Simultaneously, the research results published in most of the analyzed articles did not indicate statistically significant differences between the sense of subjective well-being and psychological well-being of gifted and talented students compared to average-ability students. Studies on the well-being of gifted children and young people employ a number of scales relating to different areas of human psychophysical functioning, i.e.: mood, stress, sense of self-efficacy, interests, sense of loneliness, sense of humor, atmosphere in school, which allows a holistic view of the analyzed phenomenon.
PL
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przegląd badań naukowych dotyczących problematyki dobrostanu (well-being) uzdolnionych dzieci i młodzieży. Przyjęto procedurę przeglądu systematycznego w oparciu o protokół Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (Page et al. 2021). Analizie poddano 15 artykułów opublikowanych w latach 2005–2022 w recenzowanych czasopismach naukowych. Analizy pokazały, że nie można jednoznacznie stwierdzić, czy uzdolnienia są czynnikiem ryzyka, czy też czynnikiem chroniącym dla subiektywnego poczucia dobrostanu dzieci i młodzieży uzdolnionej. Jednocześnie wyniki badań publikowane w większości analizowanych tekstów nie wskazały istotnych statystycznie różnic między poczuciem dobrostanu subiektywnego, jak i psychicznego uczniów uzdolnionych w porównaniu do uczniów o przeciętnych zdolnościach. W badaniach subiektywnego poczucia dobrostanu uzdolnionych dzieci i młodzieży wykorzystuje się szereg skal odnoszących się do różnych obszarów psychofizycznego funkcjonowania człowieka, np. nastroju, stresu, poczucia własnej skuteczności, zainteresowań, poczucia samotności, poczucia humoru, klimatu szkolnego, co pozwala na holistyczne spojrzenie na analizowane zjawisko.

Year

Volume

16

Issue

1

Pages

35-56

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
  • University of Connecticut, USA

References

  • Aghababaei N., Farahani H. (2011) Appreciate the Role of Gratitude Veins in Predicting Psychological Well-Being and Subjective Psychological and Nominative, “Evolutionary Psychology”, nr 8(11), s. 1–29.
  • Amerijckx G., Humblet C. (2014) Child-Wellbeing: What does it Mean?, “Children & Society”, nr 28, s. 404–415, https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12003
  • Bergold S., Wirthwein L., Rost D. H., Steinmayr R. (2015) Are Gifted Adolescents More Satisfied with Their Lives than Their Non-gifted Peers?, “Frontiers in Psychology”, nr 6:1623, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01623
  • Bergold S., Wirthwein L., Steinmayr R. (2020) Similarities and Differences Between Intellectually Gifted and Average-Ability Students in School Performance, Motivation, and Subjective Well-Being, “Gifted Child Quarterly”, nr 64(4), s. 285–303, https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220932533
  • Berk L. E. (2006) Development through the lifespan (4th ed.), Boston, MA, Pearson.
  • Boazman J. K., Sayler M. F. (2011) Personal Well-Being of Gifted Students Following Participation in an Early College-Entrance Program, “Roeper Review”, nr 33(2), s. 76–85, https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.554153
  • Boazman J. K., Sayler M. F., Easton-Brooks D. (2012) Mediating Factors of Personal Wellbeing in Gifted College Students: Early-College Entrants and Honors College Students, “Journal of Social Research & Policy”, nr 3, s. 111–131.
  • Braun V., Clarke V. (2006) Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. “Qualitative Research in Psychology”, nr 3(2), s. 77–101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Carrillo G., Alfaro J., Aspillaga C., Ramírez-Casas del Valle L., Inostroza C., Villarroel A. (2021) Well-Being from the Understanding of Children and Adolescents: A Qualitative Metasynthesis, “Child Indicators Research”, nr 14, s. 1677–1701.
  • Casas F., Bello A., González M., Aligué M. (2013) Children’s Subjective Well-Being Measured Using a Composite Index: What Impacts Spanish First-Year Secondary Education Students’ Subjective Well-Being?, “Child Indicators Research”, nr 6, s. 433–460, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9182-x
  • Cash T. N., Lin T.-J. (2022) Psychological Well-Being of Intellectually and Academically Gifted Students in Self-Contained and Pull-Out Gifted Programs, “Gifted Child Quarterly”, nr 66(3), s. 188–207, https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211032987
  • Casino-García A. M., García-Pérez J., Llinares-Insa L. I. (2019) Subjective Emotional Well-Being, Emotional Intelligence, and Mood of Gifted vs. Unidentified Students: A Relationship Model, “International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health”, nr 16(18): 3266, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183266
  • Chadegani A. A., Salehi H., Yunus M. M., Farhadi H., Fooladi M., Farhadi M., Ebrahim N. A. A. (2013) Comparison Between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases, “Asian Social Science”, nr 9(5), s. 18–26, https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
  • Chan D. W. (2007) Positive and Negative Perfectionism among Chinese Gifted Students in Hong Kong: Their Relationships to General Self-Efficacy and Subjective Well-Being, “Journal for the Education of the Gifted”, nr 31(1), s. 77–102, https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2007-512
  • Chang M. L. (2009) An Appraisal Perspective of Teacher Burnout: Examining the Emotional Work of Teachers, “Educational Psychology Review”, nr 21(3), s. 193–218, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9106-y
  • Chen X., Fan X., Cheung H. Y., Wu J. (2018) The Subjective Well-Being of Academically Gifted Students in the Chinese Cultural Context, “School Psychology International”, nr 39(3), s. 291– 311, https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318773788
  • Coulombe S., Hardy K., Goldfarb R. (2020) Promoting wellbeing through positive education: A critical review and proposed social ecological approach, “Theory and Research in Education”, nr 18(3), s. 295–321, https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878520988432
  • Cross T. L., Cassady J. C., Dixon F. A., Adams C. M. (2008) The Psychology of Gifted Adolescents as Measured by the MMPI-A, “Gifted Child Quarterly”, nr 52, s. 326–339, https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208321810
  • Diener E. (2000) Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index, “American Psychologist”, nr 55, s. 34–43, https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
  • Dijkstra P., Barelds D., Ronner S., Nauta A. (2011) Humor Styles and their Relationship to Well-Being among the Gifted, „Gifted and Talented International”, nr 26(1–2), s. 89–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2011.11673592
  • Garritty C., Gartlehner G., Nussbaumer-Streit B., King V. J., Hamel C., Kamel C., Affengruber L., Stevens A. (2021) Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group Offers Evidence-Informed Guidance to Conduct Rapid Reviews, “Journal of Clinical Epidemiology“, nr 130, s. 13–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007
  • Gillett-Swan J. K. (2014) Investigating Tween Children’s Capacity to Conceptualise the Complex Issue of Wellbeing, “Global Studies of Childhood”, nr 4, s. 64–76, https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2014.4.2.64
  • Gross M. U. M. (2006) Exceptionally Gifted Children: Long-Term Outcomes of Academic Acceleration and Nonacceleration, “Journal for the Education of Gifted Students”, nr 29, s. 404–429, https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2006-247
  • Hascher T., Hagenauer G. (2011) Schulisches Wohlbefinden im Jugendalter – Verläufe und Einflussfaktoren w: A. Ittel, H. Merkens, L. Stecher (red.), Jahrbuch Jugendforschung, Wiesbaden, Springer, s. 15–45, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93116-6_1
  • Hill N. E., Taylor L. C. (2004) Parental School Involvement and Children’s Academic Achievement: Pragmatics and Issues, “Current Directions in Psychological Science”, nr 13(4), s. 161–164, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00298.x
  • Holmes E. A., O’Connor R. C., Perry V. H., Tracey I., Wessely S., Arseneault L., Bullmore E. D. (2020) Multidisciplinary Research Priorities for the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Call for Action for Mental Health Science, “The Lancet Psychiatry”, nr 7, s. 547–560, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1
  • Jin S.-U., Moon S. M. (2006) A Study of Well-Being and School Satisfaction Among Academically Talented Students Attending a Science High School in Korea, “Gifted Child Quarterly”, nr 50(2), s. 169–184, https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000207
  • Konu A. I., Lintonen T. P. (2006) School Wellbeing in Grades 4–12, “Health Education Research”, nr 21(5), s. 633–642, https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl032
  • Kroesbergen E. H., van Hooijdonk M., Van Viersen S., Middel-Lalleman M. M. N., Reijnders J. J. W. (2016) The Psychological Well-Being of Early Identified Gifted Children, “Gifted Child Quarterly”, nr 60(1), s.16–30, https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215609113
  • Kutsar D., Kasearu K. (2017) Do Children Like School – Crowding in or out? International Comparison of Children’s Perspectives, “Children and Youth Services Review”, nr 80, s. 140–148, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.052
  • Lopez V., Sotillo M. (2009) Giftedness and Social Adjustment: Evidence Supporting the Resilience Approach in Spanish-Speaking Children and Adolescents, “High Ability Studies”, nr 20, s. 39– 53, https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130902860739
  • Loureiro K. S., Grecu A., de Moll F., Hadjar A. (2020) Analyzing Drawings to Explore Children’s Concepts of an Ideal School: Implications for the Improvement of Children’s Well-Being at School, “Child Indicators Research”, nr 13, s. 1387–1411, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-019-09705-8
  • Mantovani S., Bove C., Ferria P., Manzonib M., Cesa Bianchib A., Picca M. (2021) Children ‘Under Lockdown’: Voices, Experiences, and Resources During and After the COVID-19 Emergency. Insights from a Survey with Children and Families in the Lombardy Region of Italy, “European Early Childhood Education Research Journal”, nr 29(1), s. 35–50, https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1872673
  • McCluskey G., Fry D., Hamilton S., King A., Laurie M., McAra L., Stewart T. M. (2021) School Closures, Exam Cancellations and Isolation: the Impact of Covid-19 on Young People’s Mental Health, “Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties”, nr 26(1), s. 46–59, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2021.1903182
  • Morinaj J., Hascher T. (2018) School Alienation and Student Well-Being: A Cross-Lagged Longitudinal Analysis, “European Journal of Psychology of Education”, nr 34(2), s. 273–294, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0381-1
  • Mullet D. R., Rinn A. N., Kettler T. (2017) Catalysts of Women’s Talent Development in STEM: A Systematic Review, “Journal of Advanced Academics” 28(4), 253–289, https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17735305
  • Neihart M. (1999) The Impact of Giftedness on Psychological Well-Being: What does the Empirical Literature Say?, „Roeper Review”, nr 22(1), s. 10–17, https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553991
  • Newland L. A., Giger J. T., Lawler M. J., Roh S., Brockevelt B. L., Schweinle A. (2019) Multilevel Analysis of Child and Adolescent Subjective Well-Being across 14 Countries: Child- and Country-Level Predictors, “Child Development”, nr 90, s. 395–413, https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13134
  • O’Boyle M. W. (2008) Mathematically Gifted Children: Developmental Brain Characteristics and Their Prognosis for Well-Being, „Roeper Review”, nr 30(3), s. 181–186, https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190802199594
  • Ogurlu U., Yalin H. S., Yavuz Birben F. (2018) The Relationship Between Psychological Symptoms, Creativity, and Loneliness in Gifted Children, “Journal for the Education of the Gifted”, nr 41(2), s. 193–210, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218763968
  • Oreopoulos P. (2007) Do Dropouts Drop out Too Soon? Wealth, Health, and Happiness from Compulsory Schooling, “Journal of Public Economics”, nr 91, s. 2213–2229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.02.002
  • Page M. J., McKenzie J. E., Bossuyt P. M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T. C., Mulrow C. D. et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews, “Research Methods & Reporting”, nr 372:n71, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  • Plominski A. P., Burns L. R. (2018) An Investigation of Student Psychological Wellbeing: Honors Versus Nonhonors Undergraduate Education, “Journal of Advanced Academics”, nr 29(1), s. 5–28, https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17735358
  • Powell M. A., Graham A., Fitzgerald R., Thomas N., White N. E. (2018) Wellbeing in Schools: What do Students Tell Us?, „ The Australian Educational Researcher”, nr 45, s. 515–531, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0273-z
  • Rathmann K., Herke K., Heilmann K., Kinnunen J. M., Rimpela A., Hurrelmann K., Richter M. (2018) Perceived School Climate, Academic Well-Being and School-Aged Children’s Self- Rated Health: A Mediator Analysis, “The European Journal of Public Health”, nr 28(6), s. 1012–1018, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky089
  • Renzulli J. S. (1982) What Makes a Problem Real: Stalking the Illusive Meaning of Qualitative Differences in Gifted education, “Gifted Child Quarterly”, nr 26, s. 47–156, https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628202600401
  • Renzulli J. S., Delcourt M. A. (1986) The Legacy and Logic of Research on the Identification of Gifted Persons, “Gifted Child Quarterly”, nr 30(1), s. 20–23, https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628603000104
  • Robertson J. C. (2013) Self-Concept, School Satisfaction, and Other Selected Correlates of Subjective Well-Being for Advanced High School Learners Enrolled in Two Challenging Academic Settings, “Journal for the Education of the Gifted”, nr 36(4), s. 461–486, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213506068
  • Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2018) Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness, New York, NY, Guilford Press, https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
  • Schwartz K. D., Exner-Cortens D., McMorris C. A., Makarenko E., Arnold P., Van Bavel M., Williams S., Canfield R. (2021) COVID-19 and Student Well-Being: Stress and Mental Health during Return-to-School, “Canadian Journal of School Psychology”, nr 36(2), s. 166–185, https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735211001653
  • Shaunessy E., Suldo S. M., Hardesty R. B., Shaffer E. J. (2006) School Functioning and Psychological Well-Being of International Baccalaureate and General Education Students A Preliminary Examination, “Journal of Secondary Gifted Education”, nr 17(2), s. 76–89, https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2006-683
  • Shechtman Z., Silektor A. (2012) Social Competencies and Difficulties of Gifted Children Compared to Nongifted Peers, “Roeper Review”, nr 34, s. 63–72, https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.627555
  • Silverman L. K. (2000) Social Development, Leadership and Gender Issues w: L. K. Silverman (red.), Counseling the Gifted and Talented, Denver, Love Publishing Co., s. 291–327.
  • Tamannaeifar M. R., Motaghedifard M. (2014) Subjective Well-Being and its Sub-Scales Among Students: The Study of Role of Creativity and Self-Efficacy, “Thinking Skills and Creativity”, nr 12, s. 37–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.003
  • Thomas N. (2016) Conceptualisations of Children’s Wellbeing at School: The Contribution of Recognition Theory, “Childhood”, nr 23(4), s. 506–520, https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568215622802
  • Tomyn A. J., Stokes M. A., Cummins R. A., Dias P. C. (2020) A Rasch Analysis of the Personal Well-Being Index in School Children, “Evaluation & the Health Professions”, nr 43(2), s. 110–119, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278718819219
  • Tu B., Huang Ch.-Ch., Sorensen J. (2020) Effects of Education Philanthropy on Well-Being of Low-Income and Gifted Students in China, “Children and Youth Services Review”, nr 108:104659, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104659

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
30148745

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18778_2450-4491_16_03
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.