Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2019 | 12 | 2(23) | 130-133

Article title

Editors’ introduction

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

Keywords

Year

Volume

12

Issue

Pages

130-133

Physical description

Dates

published
2019-07-23

Contributors

  • National University of Politcal Studies and Public Administration
author
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

References

  • Bracciale, R., & Martella, A. (2017). Define the populist political communication style: The case of Italian political leaders on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1310–1329.
  • Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47, 2–16. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00184
  • Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126.
  • Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.
  • Maurer, P., Hubé, N., Štětka, V., Cremonesi, C., Seddone, A., Bergan, … Esser, F. (2019). Journalistic culture, editorial mission, and news logic: Explaining the factors behind the use of populism in European media. In C. Reinemann, J. Stanyer, T. Aalberg, F. Esser, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Communicating Populism: Comparing actor perceptions, media coverage, and effects on citizens in Europe (pp. 102–122). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Mazzoleni, G. (2007). Populism and the media. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (Eds.), Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy (pp. 49–64). Berlin: Springer.
  • Mazzoleni, G., Stewart, J., & Horsfield, B. (Eds.). (2003). The media and neo-populism: A contemporary comparative analysis. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002). The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 1–21). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Mercier, A. (2016). Twitter as a counter public sphere: Polemics in the Twittersphere during French electoral campaigns. In A. Frame & G. Brachotte (Eds.), Citizen participation and political participation in a digital world (pp. 139–152). London: Routledge.
  • Mudde, C. (2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.
  • Reinemann, C., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. (2017). Populist political communication: Toward a model of its causes, forms, and effects. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 12–25). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Taggart, P. (2004). Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 269–288. doi:10.1080/13569310420 00263528.

Document Type

Publication order reference

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_19195_1899-5101_12_2_23__1
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.