Some remarks on the comparative experiment as a method in assessing populist political communication in Europe

• Authors: Dominika Kasprowicz , Agnieszka Hess
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this paper fundamental information concerning the designing and conducting of comparative experiments, as methods which are able to be employed in the field of media studies, will be successively delineated. On the basis of the large-scale online experiment conducted in 15 countries in 2017, the assessment of the populist message impact as well as methodological challenges to such a project will be presented. We discuss challenges and lessons learnt from this type of research design.

Keywords

EN

populism; populist communication; comparative experiment

• Publisher: Polskie Towarzystwo Komunikacji Społecznej
• Journal: Central European Journal of Communication
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 2(23)
• Pages: 243-255

Dates

published

2019-07-23

Contributors

author

Dominika Kasprowicz

• Jagiellonian University

author

Agnieszka Hess

• Jagiellonian University

References

• Aalberg T., Esser F., Reinemann C., Strömbäck J., & de Vreese. C. (Eds.). (2017). Populist political communication in Europe. New York: Routledge.
• Andreadis, I., Cremonesi, C., Kartsounidou, E., Kasprowicz, D., & Hess, A. (2019). Attitudinal and behavioral responses to populist communication: The impact of populist message elements on populist attitudes and voting intentions. In C. Reinemann, J. Stanyer, T. Aalberg, F. Esser, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Communicating populism: Comparing actor perceptions, media coverage, and effects on citizens in Europe (pp. 207–232). New York: Routledge.
• Boruch, R. (1994). Randomized experiments for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
• Bos, L., Schemmer, C., Corbu, N., Hameleers, M., Andreadis, I., Schulz, A., Schmuck, D., et al. (2019, forthcoming). The effects of populism as a social identity frame on persuasion and mobilization: Evidence from a 15-country experiment. European Journal of Political Research.
• Cook, T., & Campbell, T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNelly.
• Corbu, N., Bos, L., Schemer, C., Schulz, A., Matthes, J., de Vreese, C.H., Aalberg, T., & Suiter, J. (2019). Cognitive responses to populist communication: The impact of populist message elements on blame attribution and stereotyping. In C. Reinemann, J. Stanyer, T. Aalberg, F. Esser, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Communicating populism: Comparing actor perceptions, media coverage, and effects on citizens in Europe (pp. 183–206). New York: Routledge.
• Francuz, P., & Mackiewicz, T. (2007). Liczby nie wiedzą, skąd pochodzą. Przewodnik po metodologii i statystyce nie tylko dla psychologów [Numbers do not know where they come from. A methodology and statistics guide not only for psychologists]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
• Greenberg, D., & Shroder, M. (2004). The digest of social experiment (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
• Grobler, A. (2006). Metodologia nauk [Methodology of sciences]. Kraków: Auerus/Znak.
• Hameleers, M., Bos, L., Fawzi, N., Reinemann, C., Andreadis, I., Corbu, N., Schemer, C., et al. (2018). Start spreading the news: A comparative experiment on the effects of populist communication on political participation in 16 European countries. International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 517–538.
• Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.
• Mill, J. S. (2009). The system of logic. Retrieved December 20, 2018, from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/27942/27942-pdf.pdf.
• Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
• Sułek, A. (1979). Eksperyment w badaniach społecznych [Experiment in social studies]. Warszawa: PWN.

Identifiers

DOI

10.19195/1899-5101.12.2(23).8