Namiętności i walka z nimi według Marka Eremity

• Authors: Leon Nieścior

Title variants

EN

Passions and struggle against them according to Mark the Ascetic

Abstracts

EN

Writing in his works about passions, Mark the Ascetic had behind hima long-term tradition of ascetic thought. However, an inquisitiveness leadsthe Master of asceticism to original statements on this subject. In forgettinggood thoughts, in recklessness and unawareness (ῥᾳθυμία, λήθη, ἄγνοια)he sees the origin of many passions. The common root of passion is thehuman tendency to seek pleasure (ἡδυπαθεία). Mark the Ascetic finds inthe theologal life, which determined by faith, hope and love, and which isinitiated by baptism, the basis of moral innocence of man. In the absence ofthis life, he sees the cause of the development of evil. He points to concretemeasures to fight passions. The forgetting should be contrasted with thememory of good works, the negligence with the sincere readiness to fight,and the unawareness with the enlightened cognition. The author emphasizesthe role of meditation, especially of God’s favours and Christ’s abasement,in the fight against faults. As a theologian of the Holy Spirit, he reflects onHis role in asceticism.

Keywords

PL

Marek Eremita; asceza; namiętności

EN

Mark the Ascetic; asceticism; passions

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
• Journal: Collectanea Theologica
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 89
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 101-114

Dates

published

2019

Contributors

author

Leon Nieścior

References

• Marcus Eremita, Ad Nicolaum praecepta animae salutaria, PG 65, 1028-1053.
• Marcus Eremita, Consultatio intellectus cum sua ipsius anima, PG 65, 1104-1109.
• Marcus Eremita, De baptismo, PG 65, 985-1028.
• Marcus Eremita, De his qui putant se ex operibus iustificari, PG 65, 929-965.
• Marcus Eremita, De lege spirituali, PG 65, 905-929.
• Marcus Eremita, Disputatio cum quodam causidico, PG 65, 1072-1101
• Marek Mnich, De paenitentia, PG 65, 965-984.
• Pseudo-Jan Damasceński, De virtutibus et vitiis (fragmenta), PG 95, 85-97.
• Faure E., Mémoire, connaissance et zèle dans le combat spirituel selon la Lettre à Nicolas at-tribuée à Marc le moine, „Nouvelle Revue Théologique” 4/139 (2017), s. 605–618.
• Hesse O., Der Streit über die Wirkung der Taufe im frühen Mönchtum bei Makarios/Symeon, Markos Eremites und den Messalianern, [w:] D. Hellholm, T. Vegge, Ø. Norderval, C. Hellholm (éds.), Ablution, Initiation, and Baptism: Late Antiquity, Early Judaism, and Ear-ly Christianity, Berlin-Boston 2011, s. 1305-1345.
• Hesse O., [Einleitung in:] Markus Eremita, Asketische und dogmatische Schriften; eingeleitet, übersetzt und mit Anmerkungen versehen von O. Hesse, Stuttgart 1985, s. 1-151.
• Jüssen K., Dasein und Wesen der Erbsünde nach Markus Eremita, „Zeitschrift für Katholische Theologie” 62 (1938), s. 76-91.
• Khalifé I.-A., L’antropologie théologique de Marc l’Ermite. De l‘esclavage intérieur à la liber-té spirituelle, Roma 1949.
• Krausmüller D., Religious Instruction for Laypeople in Byzantium: Stephen of Nicomedia, Ni-cephorus Ouranos, and the Pseudo-Athanasian Syntagma ad quendam politicum, Byzan-tion 77 (2007), s. 239-250.
• Ware K. T., The meaning of Pathos in Abba Isaias and Theodoret of Cyrus, Studia Patristica 20 (1989), s. 315-322.
• Zajcev I., Svjatootečeskoe učenie o glavnych momentach postepennogo razvitija grecha (sv. Ioann Lestvičnik, sv. Ioann Kassian, sv. Diadoch i sv. Mark Podwižnik), Moskau 1959 [mszps].

Identifiers

DOI

10.21697/ct.2019.89.1.07

Biblioteka Nauki

2033644