Pedeutological aspects of using new technologies in education

• Authors: Krzysztof Łuszczek
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

New technologies that have been used in education are treated as the “golden mean” to remove most of the educational problems. Over time, it turns out that many of the original hopes have been disappointed. This paper tries to answer the question: Why is this happening? The historical-critical method allows analysing certain elements of the education system that are important to it and which turned out to be crucial when introducing additional technologies. That is the case with the position of a teacher in the education process. It turns out that the teacher's ideas about education can have a significant impact on his / her attitude to new technologies and thus their effectiveness. Hence, not only the preparation of teachers to use new technologies, but also shaping their ideas and building educational traditions is equally important in the effective application of new technologies in education.

PL

Nowe technologie, które trafiają do edukacji są traktowane jako „złoty środek” mający usunąć większość edukacyjnych bolączek. Po czasie okazuje się, że wiele z pierwotnych nadziei zostało zawiedzionych. Niniejszy artykuł próbuje odpowiedzieć na pytanie: Dlaczego tak się dzieje? Metoda historyczno-krytyczna pozwala przeanalizować pewne elementy systemu edukacji, które są dla niego istotne a które przy wprowadzaniu kolejnych technologii okazywały się kluczowe. Tak jest z pozycją nauczyciela w procesie edukacji. Okazuje się, że wyobrażenia nauczyciela na temat edukacji mogą mieć istotny wpływ na jego stosunek do nowych technologii a co za tym idzie na ich skuteczność. Stąd nie tylko przygotowanie nauczycieli do posługiwania się nowymi technologiami, ale także kształtowanie ich wyobrażeń i budowa tradycji edukacyjnych jest równie istotne w efektywnym zastosowaniu nowych technologii w edukacji.

Keywords

EN

teacher; information technologies; pedeutology; culture of education

PL

nauczyciel; ; technologie informacyjne; pedeutologia; kultura edukacji; nauczyciel; ; technologie informacyjne; pedeutologia; kultura edukacji

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
• Journal: Forum Pedagogiczne
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 10
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 263-272

Dates

published

2020-07-18

Contributors

author

Krzysztof Łuszczek

• Uniwersytet Szczeciński

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1862-5028

References

• Beynon, J. (1993). Technological Literacy: Where Do We Go from Here. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 1(2), 7–35.
• Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. London: Harvard University Press.
• Centre for Education Research and Innovation (CERI). (1989). Information Technologies in Education: The Quest for Quality Software. Paris: OECD.
• Clocke, S., & Sharif, S. (2001). Why Use Information and Communications Technology? Some Theoretical and Practical Issues. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 1(2), 7–18.
• Dillon, P. (2000). Innovation, Renovation and Terminological Precision. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 1(2), 3–8.
• Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2001). Running with Technology: The Pedagogic Impact of the Large-Scale Introduction of Interactive Whiteboards on one Secondary School. Journal of Information technology for Teacher Education, 3(1), 257–276.
• Gobbo, C., & Girardi, M. (2001). Teacher’s Beliefs and Integration of Information and Communications Technology in Italian Schools. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(2), 63–85.
• Godson, J., & Mangan, J.M. (1993). Computers in Schools as Symbolic and Ideological Action. Curriculum Journal, 3, 261–276.
• Holloway, J. (2002). Change the World Without Taking Power. London: Pluto Press.
• Jakobsdóttir, S. (2001). Some Effects of Information and Communications Technology on Teaching and Learning in Iceland. Journal of Informational Technology for Teacher Education, 1(2), 87–100.
• Kirschner, P., & Wopereis, I. (2003). Mindtools Teacher Communities: a European Perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1, 106–124.
• Loveless, A. (2003). Information and Communication Technology as a Catalyst for Professional Growth. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 3, 325–328.
• Lovink, G. (2011). Networks Without a Cause: A Critique of Social Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Maor, D., & Taylor, P.Ch. (1995). Teacher Epistemology and Scientific Inquiry in Computerized Classroom Environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 839–854.
• McCormick, R. (1992). Curriculum Development and New Information Technology. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 1, 23–50.
• Moore-Hayes, C. (2011). Technology Integration Preparedness and its Influence on Teacher - Efficacy. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 3, 1–15.
• Oliva, P.F. (1992). Developing the Curriculum. New York: Harper Collins.
• Reiser, R. (2001). A History of Instructional Design and Technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1, 53–64.
• Ruggiero, D., & Mong, Ch.J. (2015). The Teacher Technology Integration Experience: Practice and Reflection in the Classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 161–178.
• Selinger, M., & Austin, R. (2003). A Comparison of the Influence of Government Policy on Information and Communications in Technology for Teacher Training in England and Northern Ireland. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 4, 19–38.
• Selwyn, N. (2014). Distrusting Educational Technology. Critical Questions for Changing Times. New York: Routledge.
• Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and Technology. Key Issues and Debates. London, Oxford, New York, New Delhi: Bloomsbury.
• Selwyn, N. (2017). Is technology Good for Education? Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Tweddle, S. (1993). The Future Curriculum and Information Technology. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 1, 105–110.
• Wellington, J.J. (1990). The Impact of IT on the School Curriculum: Downwards, Sideways, Backwards and Forwards. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22, 57–76.
• Woolfolk Hoy, A.E. (2000). Changes in Teacher Self-Efficacy during Early Years of Teaching. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (28 April 2000): http://www.learningforwardpa.org/uploads/2/0/8/5/20859956/changes_in_teacher_efficacy.pdf (accessed 17.03.2019).

Identifiers

DOI

10.21697/fp.2020.2.19