Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 29 | 4 | 25-39

Article title

Apelacja obrońcy węzła małżeńskiego w procesie skróconym o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa

Content

Title variants

EN
The appeal of the defender of the bond in the processus brevior for nullity of marriage

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
The application for appeal against the judgment is also possible in the so-called processus brevior, a shortened form of the trial for the nullity of marriage, which takes place before the bishop. It is obvious that the economy of the shortened process can not be in contradiction with the fundamental right to a just judgment and its challenge if the party does not consider it so. Despite the postulated speed of the process, this right must be preserved. In the case of the appeal of the defender of the bond, in the face of the abolition of the requirement of two identical judgements, we additionally deal with the defense of the sacrament of marriage as a public good. This is in the interest of the Church, which is protected by appealing the judgement. The specificity of the processus brevior, consisting in its simplification and acceleration of the procedures, obviously requires the use of specific norms set for it, different from those that govern the ordinary process. This applies to the jurisdiction of the appellate tribunal, confirmation of the bishop’s judgment and the admission itself, or the possibility of rejecting the appeal a limine. The remaining requirements for the appeal in the processus brevior are identical to those that the legislator asks the ordinary in the ordinary process. However, they refer to the presentation of the appeal, its support, and statutory deadlines for accomplishing this. The appeal of the defender of the bond in the processus brevior has a special meaning, because most often with such, if it occurs, we will have to deal with procedural practice. This is supported by the consistent demand of private parties that appear to be interested in obtaining pro nullitate judgement, which is the only one that can be issued by the bishop before which the proceedings are pending.

Year

Volume

29

Issue

4

Pages

25-39

Physical description

Dates

published
2018-10-15

Contributors

References

  • Boni G., La recente riforma del processo di nullità matrimoniale. Problemi, criticità, dubbi (parte seconda), Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale 10/2016, https://www.statoechiese.it/contributi/la-recente-riforma-del-processo-di-nullita-matrimoniale.-problemi-crit, [dostęp: 10.10.2018], s. 1-76.
  • Góralski W., Proces małżeński skrócony przed biskupem, Płock 2017.
  • Greszata-Telusiewicz M., Processus brevior, w: J. Krajczyński (red.), Proces małżeński według motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus, Płock 2015, s. 75-92.
  • Kamiński R., Apelacja obrońcy węzła małżeńskiego w procesie zwyczajnym o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa, Ius Matrimoniale, 29(2018) nr 3, s. 63-83.
  • Majer P., Komentarz do art. 5. Tytuł IV. Proces małżeński skrócony przed biskupem, w: P. Skonieczny (red.), Praktyczny komentarz do Listu apostolskiego motu proprio „Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus” papieża Franciszka, Tarnów 2015, s. 163-217.
  • ---
  • Moneta P., La dinamica processuale nel m.p. „Mitis Iudex”, Seminario di studio presso la Lumsa, Roma 30 ottobre 2015, http://www.consociatio.org/repository/Moneta_Lumsa.pdf [dostęp: 10.10.2018], s. 1-20.
  • Montini P., Dopo la decisione giudiziale: apello e altre impugnazioni, w: Redazione di Quaderni di Diritto Canonico (red.), La riforma del processi matrimoniali di Papa Francesco. Una guida per tutti, Milano 2016, s. 109-125.
  • ---
  • Pontificium Consilium de Legis Textibus, Circa il suffraganeus antiquior nel nuovo can. 1687 § 3 Mitis Iudex, Vaticano 13 ottobre 2015, Prot. N. 15155/2015, http://www.delegumtextibus.va/content/dam/testilegislativi/risposte-particolari/Procedure%20per%20la%20Dichiarazione%20della%20Nullità%20matrimoniale/Circa%20il%20suffraganeus%20antiquior%20nel%20nuovo%20can.%201687%20§3%20Mitis%20Iudex.pdf [dostęp: 10.10.2018].
  • Skonieczny P., Komentarz do art. 4. Tytuł IV. Wyrok, środki jego zaskarżenia oraz wykonanie, w: P. Skonieczny (red.), Praktyczny komentarz do Listu apostolskiego motu proprio „Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus” papieża Franciszka, Tarnów 2015, s. 123-162.
  • Trybunał Apostolski Roty Rzymskiej, Subsydium aplikacyjne do Motu proprio „Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus”, Watykan 2016.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_21697_im_2018_29_4_02
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.