Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Salvatori z 7 maja 2020 roku

• Authors: Wojciech Góralski

Title variants

EN

Grave defect of discretion of judgment (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC) in the sentence of the Roman Rota c. Salvatori of 07 May 2020

Abstracts

EN

The negative sentence c. Salvatori in the case under the gravis defectus discretionis iudicii (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC) on both sides, taken in the second instance, when the first ruled positively in relation to both parties, is an example of a reliable assessment of the collected material evidence. In the sentence, quite a lot of space was devoted to the role and tasks of an expert in the cases of can. 1095, n. 1-3 CIC. It is worth emphasizing here that an opinion prepared solely on the basis of the case file is not a true expert opinion. Salvatori pointed to the practice developed in rotational jurisprudence, according to which a judge should reject an expert’s conclusions when they do not comply with the case files or violate the rules of logic or go beyond the premises on which they are based, or when they are inconsistent with Christian anthropology. Ponens convincingly demonstrated the groundlessness of prof. D. (with respect to the woman) grossly inconsistent with the case files and going far beyond the premises that served him to formulate such a thesis.  

Keywords

PL

wyrok c. Salvatori z 7.05.2020; małżeństwo; nieważność małżeństwa; rozeznanie oceniające

EN

sentence c. Salvatori of 7.05.2029; marriage; nullity of marriage; discretion of judgment

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
• Journal: Ius Matrimoniale
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 30
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 101-122

Dates

published

2019

Contributors

author

Wojciech Góralski

• Wydział Prawa Kanonicznego UKSW

• https://orcid.org/0000000165484120

Identifiers

DOI

10.21697/im.2019.30.4.06

Biblioteka Nauki

21150621