Parafilia wyzwaniem dla małżeństwa kanonicznego

• Authors: Kinga Szymańska

Title variants

EN

Paraphilia as a challenge for canonical marriage

Abstracts

EN

The considerations made in this article justify the conclusion that a paraphilic assesses the marriage from a selfish perspective, because everything he does is aimed at satisfying his pleasure. He does not consider the other person or the possibility of treating him objectively - in other words, a parafilik treats his partner as a thing to satisfy his selfish need for pleasure. Meanwhile, in the marriage relationship, closeness and realization of the good of the other party are sought as an equal partner. On the other hand, paraphilism, which is a sexual impulse, destroys not only the marriage but the spouse and, to a greater or lesser extent, the paraphilic himself. In a marriage with a paraphilic, there is no stability, no realization of the spouse's good, no realization of the community of life and love, only instinctive satisfaction, which is also unnatural. Nevertheless, regardless of the definition of paraphilia in medical sciences and psychology, when conducting a trial in an ecclesiastical court, it should be verified in the light of the concept of Christian anthropology, proper to canon studies. The paraphilia itself does not nullity it, it all depends on the severity of the disorder in question and its impact on the functioning in marriage.

Keywords

PL

parafilia; zaburzenie parafilne; kanoniczne prawo małżeńskie; nieważność małżeństwa; proces małżeński

EN

paraphilia; paraphilic disorders; canonical marriage law; marriage nullity; marriage proces

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
• Journal: Ius Matrimoniale
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 31
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 25-49

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Kinga Szymańska

• Sąd Metropolitalny Warszawski

• https://orcid.org/0000000190003448

References

• Codex Iuris Canonici auctoritate Joannis Pauli PP. II promulgatus–25.01.1983, AAS 75 (1983), pars II, s. 1-317.
• Fuentes J. A., Desviaciones de la sexualidad. Parafilias y transsexualismo en las causas de nulidad matrimonial canonica, Ius Canonicum 53 (2013) nr 106, s. 655-690.
• Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Mental Disorders, Washington DC 1952.
• Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Washington DC 1968.
• Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–III), Washington DC 1980.
• Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Text Revision (DSM–IV-TR), Washington DC 2000.
• Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), Washington DC – London 2013.
• International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10), t. 1, Geneva 2016.
• International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 11th Revision (ICD-11), https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http://id.who.int/icd/entity/2110604642 (Dostęp: 15.12.2019)
• Abel G., Rouleau J., The nature and extent of sexual assault, w: Handbook of Sexual Assault: Issues, Theories and Treatment of the Offender, W.L. Marshall, D.R. Laws, H.E. Barbaree (red.), New York 1990, s. 9-21.
• Aggrawal A., Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices, New York 2008.
• Aggrawal A., Paraphilias and Sexual Crimes-An Overview, w: Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science (Five Volume Set), A. Jamieson, A. Moenssens (red.), edycja online z 2016 r., s. 2, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470061589.fsa1023/pdf (dostęp: 12.01.2020).
• Beech A.R., Miner M.H., Thornton D., Paraphilias in the DSM-5, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 12 (2016) nr 1, s. 383-406.
• Bradford J. M.W., Ahmed A.G., The natural history of paraphilia, Psychiatric Clinics of North America 37 (2014) nr 2, s. xi-xv.
• Brockman B., Bluglass R., A general psychiatric approach to sexual deviation w: Sexual deviation, I. Rosen I (red.), Oxford-New York-Tokyo 1996, s. 1-42.
• Cierpiałkowska L., Psychopatologia, Warszawa 2014.
• Dora M., Mijas M., Dobroczyński B., Kryteria zaburzeń parafilnych w DSM-5 wobec asfiksji autoerotycznej i pozaseksualnej formy ograniczania dopływu tlenu, Psychiatria Polska 53 (2019) nr 5, s. 1103-1112.
• Dunsieth N.W., Nelson E.B., Brusman-Lovins L.A, Holcomb J.L., Beckman D., Welge J.A., Roby D., Taylor Jr P., Soutullo C.A., McElroy S.L., Psychiatric and legal features of 113 men convicted of sexual offenses, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 65 (2004) nr 3, s. 293-300.
• Fedoroff J.P., Di Gioacchino L., Murphy L., Problems with paraphilias in the DSM-5, Current Psychiatry Report 15 (2013) nr 8, s. 1-6.
• Konrad N., Welke J., Optiz-Welke A., Paraphilias, Current Opinion in Psychiatry 28(2015) nr 6, s. 440-444.
• Krawczyk P., Święcicki Ł., ICD-11 vs. ICD-10 – przegląd aktualizacji i nowości wprowadzonych w najnowszej wersji Międzynarodowej Klasyfikacji Chorób WHO, Psychiatria Polska 54 (2020) nr 1, s. 7-20.
• Krueger R.B., Reed G.M., First M.B., Marais A., Kismodi E., Briken P., Proposals for Paraphilic Disorders in the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Eleventh Revision (ICD-11), Archives of Sexual Behavior 46 (2017) nr 5, s. 1529-1545.
• Lew-Starowicz Z., Seksuologia sądowa, Warszawa 2000.
• Mic A., Lew-Starowicz Z., Zaburzenia parafilne w ujęciu DSM-5, Przegląd seksuologiczny 10 (2014) z. 2, s. 16-24.
• Money J., Simcoe K.W., Acrotomophilia, Sex and Disability: New Concepts and Case Report, Sexuality and Disability 7 (1984) nr 1-2, s. 43-50.
• Pużyński S., Wciórka J. (red.), Klasyfikacje zaburzeń psychicznych i zaburzeń zachowania w ICD-10. Badawcze kryteria diagnostyczne, Kraków 1998.
• Rosenhan D.L., Seligman M E.P., Abnormal Psychology, New York 1984.
• Sadoff D.H., Other sexual deviations, w: The Sexual Experience, B.J. Sadock, H.I. Kaplan, A.M. Freedman (red.), Baltimore 1976.
• Seligman M.E.P., Walker E.F., Rosenhan D.L., Psychopatologia, Poznań 2003.
• Wiederman M W., Paraphilia and fetishism, The Family Journal 11 (2003) nr 3, s. 315-321.
• Wilcox D., Sosnoski D., Warberg B., Beech A.R., Sexual history disclosure using the polygraph in a sample of British sex offenders in treatment, Polygraph Journal 34 (2005) nr 3, s. 171-181.

Identifiers

DOI

10.21697/im.2020.31.1.02

Biblioteka Nauki

21150661