Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2020 | 18 | 3 | 29-36

Article title

Environmental Virtue Ethics and the Sources of Normativity

Content

Title variants

IT
Environmental Virtue Ethics and the Sources of Normativity
PL
Etyka cnót środowiskowych a źródła normatywności
RU
Environmental Virtue Ethics and the Sources of Normativity

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

RU
This article is an attempt to identify the sources of normativity in virtue ethics. The starting point for the analyzes presented here is the book by Dominika Dzwonkowska Environmental virtue ethics. In § 1, I present the basic theses and assumptions of this approach to ethics. Then, with reference to the concept of the moral subject proposed by Dzwonkowska, I ask whether it constitutes the primary source of normativity (§ 2). I argue that environmental virtue ethics can be ascribed to arguments shared by supporters of the so-called constitutive arguments in metaethics (§ 3). Their position is based on the recognition that moral norms, obligations, etc., derive from the constitutive features of the subject. I call such an approach internalist and contrast it with the non-internalist approach, the outline of which I propose in § 4. In the Conclusion, I suggest that the pragmatic considerations and conservatism of researchers speak in favor of the internalist approach.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł jest próbą wskazania źródeł normatywności w etyce cnót. Punktem wyjścia dla prezentowanych tutaj analiz jest książka Dominiki Dzwonkowskiej pt. Etyka cnót środowiskowych. W § 1 przedstawiam podstawowe tezy i założenia tego podejścia do etyki. Następnie odnoszę się do rozumienia podmiotu moralnego zaproponowanego przez Dzwonkowską i zadaję pytanie o to, czy stanowi on właściwe źródło normatywności (§ 2). Wykazuję, że zwolennikom etyki cnót środowiskowych można przypisać argumentację podzielaną przez zwolenników tzw. argumentów konstytutywnych w metaetyce (§ 3). Ich stanowisko opiera się na uznaniu, że moralne normy, zobowiązania itd., wynikają z konstytutywnych cech podmiotu. Takie ujęcie określam mianem internalistycznego i przeciwstawiam je koncepcji eksternalistycznej, której zarys proponuję w § 4. W Zakończeniu. sugeruję, że za stanowiskiem internalistycznym przemawiają względy pragmatyczne i konserwatyzm badaczy.
IT
This article is an attempt to identify the sources of normativity in virtue ethics. The starting point for the analyzes presented here is the book by Dominika Dzwonkowska Environmental virtue ethics. In § 1, I present the basic theses and assumptions of this approach to ethics. Then, with reference to the concept of the moral subject proposed by Dzwonkowska, I ask whether it constitutes the primary source of normativity (§ 2). I argue that environmental virtue ethics can be ascribed to arguments shared by supporters of the so-called constitutive arguments in metaethics (§ 3). Their position is based on the recognition that moral norms, obligations, etc., derive from the constitutive features of the subject. I call such an approach internalist and contrast it with the non-internalist approach, the outline of which I propose in § 4. In the Conclusion, I suggest that the pragmatic considerations and conservatism of researchers speak in favor of the internalist approach.

Year

Volume

18

Issue

3

Pages

29-36

Physical description

Dates

published
2020-09-30

Contributors

References

  • Anscombe, Elizabeth. 1958. „Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33: 1-19.
  • Cafaro, Philip. 2001. „Thoreau, Leopold, and Carson: Towards an Environmental Virtue Ethics.” Environmental Ethics 1: 3-17.
  • Chemero, Anthony. 2009. Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
  • Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2015. Environmental Skill. Motivation, Knowledge, and the Possibility of a Non-Romantic Environmental Ethics. New York: Routlege.
  • Dzwonkowska, Dominika. 2019. Etyka cnót środowiskowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
  • Enoch. David. 2006. „Agency, Schmagency: Why Normativity Won't Come from What Is Constitutive of Action.” Philosophical Review 115: 169-198.
  • Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Hill, Te. 1983. „Ideals of Human Excellence and Preserving Natural Environment.” Environmental Ethics 3: 211-224.
  • Janikowski, Wacław. 2007. “Określenie pojęć internalizmu i eksternalizmu etycznego.” Etyka 40: 130-143.
  • Jayawickreme, Eranda, and Anthony Chemero. 2008. “Ecological Moral Realism.” Review of General Psychology 12: 118-126.
  • Jonas, Hans. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Korsgaard, Christine. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rosati, Connie S. 2003. “Agency and the Open Question Argument.” Ethics 113: 490-527.
  • Stanford, Kyle P. 2019. “Unconceived Alternatives and Conservatism in Science: The Impact of Professionalization, Peer-review, and Big Science.” Synthese 196(10): 3915-3932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0856-4.
  • Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 4157(185): 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
  • Velleman, J. David. 2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wachowski, Witold M. (2018). “Normatywność usytuowana. Ujęcie ekologiczne” (“Situated normativity. An ecological approach”). Studia Philosophiae Christianae 1(54): 143-165. https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2018.54.1.16.
  • Warren, William H. 1984. „Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10(5): 683-703.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_21697_seb_2020_18_3_04
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.