Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2020 | 18 | 4 | 29-37

Article title

Man’s Attitude Towards Nature and Animal Respect Questionnaire (AniRe-Que)

Content

Title variants

IT
Man’s Attitude Towards Nature and Animal Respect Questionnaire (AniRe-Que)
PL
Kwestionariusz stosunku człowieka do przyrody i szacunku dla zwierząt (AniRe-Que)
RU
Man’s Attitude Towards Nature and Animal Respect Questionnaire (AniRe-Que)

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

RU
The psychometric properties of the author´s original tool named Questionnaire of the Relations between a Man and Animals (further on AniRe-Que) was constructed to assess the relations between a man and animals as natural beings; calculated in the form of an R-score (R as respect). The questionnaire is based on the theoretical outcomes of an egalitarian zoocentric, ecoethical position attributing moral statues to all beings, and measures the level of respect expression to nonhuman beings. The aim of this study was to verify its validity and reliability in a research sample of future primary and secondary teachers (N = 500, 62% of females, Mage=22.3; SD=4.1) at Matej Bel University in Banská  Bystrica, Slovakia. Various statistical procedures were used to verify its construct validity (exploratory factor analysis /EFA/) and its convergent/discriminating character, criterion validity, and reliability (test-retest, parallel-forms, internal consistency) to establish satisfactory psychometric properties for the AniRe-Que questionnaire. The questionnaire has possible usage for the animal relation estimation by researchers, practitioners and teachers´ ethical and environmental education intervention effectivitiveness, and also as a form of future international cooperation and verification based on this new instrument.
PL
The psychometric properties of the author´s original tool named Questionnaire of the Relations between a Man and Animals (further on AniRe-Que) was constructed to assess the relations between a man and animals as natural beings; calculated in the form of an R-score (R as respect). The questionnaire is based on the theoretical outcomes of an egalitarian zoocentric, ecoethical position attributing moral statues to all beings, and measures the level of respect expression to nonhuman beings. The aim of this study was to verify its validity and reliability in a research sample of future primary and secondary teachers (N = 500, 62% of females, Mage=22.3; SD=4.1) at Matej Bel University in Banská  Bystrica, Slovakia. Various statistical procedures were used to verify its construct validity (exploratory factor analysis /EFA/) and its convergent/discriminating character, criterion validity, and reliability (test-retest, parallel-forms, internal consistency) to establish satisfactory psychometric properties for the AniRe-Que questionnaire. The questionnaire has possible usage for the animal relation estimation by researchers, practitioners and teachers´ ethical and environmental education intervention effectivitiveness, and also as a form of future international cooperation and verification based on this new instrument.
IT
The psychometric properties of the author´s original tool named Questionnaire of the Relations between a Man and Animals (further on AniRe-Que) was constructed to assess the relations between a man and animals as natural beings; calculated in the form of an R-score (R as respect). The questionnaire is based on the theoretical outcomes of an egalitarian zoocentric, ecoethical position attributing moral statues to all beings, and measures the level of respect expression to nonhuman beings. The aim of this study was to verify its validity and reliability in a research sample of future primary and secondary teachers (N = 500, 62% of females, Mage=22.3; SD=4.1) at Matej Bel University in Banská  Bystrica, Slovakia. Various statistical procedures were used to verify its construct validity (exploratory factor analysis /EFA/) and its convergent/discriminating character, criterion validity, and reliability (test-retest, parallel-forms, internal consistency) to establish satisfactory psychometric properties for the AniRe-Que questionnaire. The questionnaire has possible usage for the animal relation estimation by researchers, practitioners and teachers´ ethical and environmental education intervention effectivitiveness, and also as a form of future international cooperation and verification based on this new instrument.

Year

Volume

18

Issue

4

Pages

29-37

Physical description

Dates

published
2020-12-21

Contributors

References

  • Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for The Behavioral Science. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.
  • Dunlap, Riley E., and Kent D. Van Liere. 1978. “The ‘new environmental paradigm’: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results.” Journal of Environmental Education 9: 10-19.
  • Gfeller, Fabienne. 2019. “It’s Still an Animal that Died for Me.” Responsibility and Meat Consumption. Europe's Journal of Psychology 15(4): 733-753. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1854.
  • Hendl, Jan. 2009. Přehled statistických metod. Praha: Portál.
  • Kasperbauer, Tyler J. 2018. Subhuman: The moral psychology of human attitudes to animals. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
  • Krajhanzl, Jan. 2014. Psychologie vztahu k přírodě a životnímu prostředí. Brno: MUNI press.
  • Maršálová, Libuša, and Ondrej Mikšík. 1990. Metodológia a metódy psychologického výskumu. Bratislava: SPN.
  • Milfont, Taciano L., and John Duckitt. 2010. “The Environmental Attitudes Inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(1): 80-94.
  • Regan, Tom. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
  • Schweitzer, Albert. 1974. Nauka úcty k životu. Praha: Lyra Pragensis.
  • Siegrist, Michael. 1996. "Questionnaire of ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes towards the environment." Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 27(4): 290-294.
  • Sullivan, Gail M., and Richard Feinn. 2012. “Using Effect Size – or Why the P-Value Is Not Enough.” Journal of Graduate Medical Education 4(3): 279-282.
  • Taylor, Paul W. 1986. Respect for Nature. A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Thompson, Suzanne C. G., and Michaelle A. Barton. 1994. “Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 14: 149-157.
  • Urbánek, Tomáš, Denisa Denglerová, and Jan Širuček. 2011. Psychometrika. Měření v psychologii. Praha: Portál.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_21697_seb_2020_18_4_03
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.