Metaphors and metaphorical language/s in religion, art and science

• Authors: Sybille C. Fritsch-Oppermann

Abstracts

EN

Languages play an essential role in communicating aesthetic, scientific and religious convictions, as well as laws, worldviews and truths. Additionally, metaphors are an essential part of many languages and artistic expressions. In this paper I will first examine the role metaphors play in religion and art. Is there a specific focus on symbolic and metaphoric language in religion and art? Where are the analogies to be found in artistic metaphors and religious ones? How are differences to be described? How do various (philosophical) concepts of aesthetics and theological concepts explain those different kinds of language and how, if at all, do they make use of them? Lastly: what could be added to aesthetics, philosophy and theology by examining carefully the role and importance of language, including nonverbal, sign language and especially metaphorical language? Without the human capacity for language, religions are scarcely imaginable. A widening of traditional exegesis and hermeneutics by taking into account nonverbal semantics is needed. Religion is a cognitive and linguistic phenomenon. By taking this seriously, we set and enable an agenda to discuss religion scientifically, leaving aside for the purpose of a scientific understanding and discourse about the inter-religious and the inner-religious claims of truth and absolutist claims. To sum it up: metaphor is introduced as an important means of language when it comes to religious conceptualization. Next, I will show that art, more than religion, deals with visual metaphor – the latter being an image that suggests a particular association, similarity or analogy between two (or more) generally unconnected visual elements. This often, but not always, functions in a roughly comparable fashion to the better-known concept of verbal metaphor. In addition, visual metaphor has developed many original and unique characteristics. These two sections are followed by another one dealing with (inter)cultural philosophy of religion and aesthetics, as well as the meaning of metaphors for these disciplines. The next section is on metaphor and metaphorical language in mathematics, natural sciences and art and how they are related, i.e. influence and help each other. I will discuss the critical approach to metaphors in natural science and provide a short introduction to the cultural history of mathematics and art. Mathematicians and artists have long been on the quest to understand the physical world they see before them and the abstract objects they know by thought alone. How have art and mathematics helped each other in representing each other’s concepts? A final section provides a summary and an outlook: theology is contextual as is science – and so is art. All these disciplines partly rely upon metaphor and by the help of metaphor get closer to an intercultural and interdisciplinary understanding. I shall argue that, by dealing more carefully with their metaphorical language and their own metaphors, together they become better equipped to map the world. -------------- Received: 20/03/2020. Reviewed: 23/04/2020. Accepted: 15/05/2020

Keywords

EN

metaphor; metaphorical language; cognitive science; neurobiology; theology; hermeneutics; intercultural philosophy; interdisciplinary discourse

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
• Journal: Studia Philosophiae Christianae
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 56
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 31-50

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Sybille C. Fritsch-Oppermann

• Technische Universität Clausthal (Lecturer)

References

• Antonović M., Waging war against oneself: A metaphor at the heart of Christian ascetic practice, in Religion, Language and the Human Mind, ed. P. Chilton, M. Kopytowska, Oxford University Press, New York 2018, 386-406.
• Aubry M., Metaphors in Mathematics: Introduction and the Case of Algebraic Geometry, (http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1478871), [accessed 09/2020].
• Barcelona A. (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin – New York 2003.
• Brandl M.S., Dr Great Art Episode 42: Defining of Visual Metaphor, (http://brandl-art-articles.blogspot.com/2018/09/dr-great-art-episode-42-defining-of.html), [accessed 09/2020].
• Chilton P., Kopytowska M. (eds.), Religion, Language and the Human Mind, Oxford University Press, New York 2018.
• Clark B., Metaphor, Simile, and Analogy: What’s the Difference?, (https://copyblogger.com/metaphor-simile-and-analogy-whats-the-difference/), [accessed 09/2020].
• Eissler F., Komparative Theologie – Eine Alternative zu bisherigen religionstheologischen Konzepten?, (http://www.reformiert-info.de/7918-0-56-7.html), [accessed 09/2020].
• Forsey J., Metaphor and Symbol in the Interpretation of Art, (http://www.artsrn.ualberta.ca/symposium/files/original/ff2c58ca6f0977066bdfb96433c52769.PDF), [accessed 09/2020].
• Gamwell L., Mathematics and Art: A Cultural History, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2016.
• Gödel K., Band 1: Philosophie I, Maximen 0 – Volume 1: Philosophy I, Max 0, in: Philosophische Notizbücher – Philosophical Notebooks, ed. E.-M. Engelen, De Gruyter, Berlin – München – Boston 2019.
• Huntington S.P., The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Simon and Schuster, New York 1996.
• Johns J., Writings, Sketchbook Notes, Interviews, Museum of Modern Art, New York 1996.
• Johnson C., Towards Understanding by Critical Constructive Inquiry: What is a Metaphor, in Mathematics?, 15 April 2010, (https://claesjohnson.blogspot.com/2010/04/what-is-metaphor-in-mathematics.html), [accessed 09/2020].
• Lakoff G., Johnson M., Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1980.
• Lakoff G., Núñez R., Where Mathematics Comes From: How The Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics Into Being, Basic Books, New York 2003.
• Mall R.A., Essays zur interkulturellen Philosophie, T. Bautz 2003.
• Stosch K. von, Komparative Theologie – ein Ausweg aus dem Grunddilemma jeder Theologie der Religionen?, (https://kw.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/fakultaet/Institute/kath-theologie/Systematische_Theologie/Prof._Dr._Klaus_von_Stosch/Publikationen/3._Artikel_Articles/4._Komparative_Theologie.pdf), [accessed 09/2020].
• Taylor C., Dewsbury B.M., On the Problem and Promise of Metaphor Use in Science and Science Communication, Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education 19(2018)1, (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1538).
• Trevor M., Difference between Sign and Symbol, (http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-sign-and-symbol/), [accessed 09/2020].
• Wollacott M., What Is the Difference between a Metaphor and a Symbol?, (https://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-a-metaphor-and-a-symbol.htm), [accessed 09/2020].
• Yousefi H.R., Grundbegriffe der Interkulturellen Kommunikation, UTB, München 2014.
• Yousefi H.R., Interkulturalität. Eine interdisziplinäre Einführung, WBG, Darmstadt 2011.

Identifiers

DOI

10.21697/spch.2020.56.3.02

Biblioteka Nauki

1927034