In the Quest for Natural Living: the Taoist and Jungian Roots of Arnold Mindell’s Therapeutic Path

• Authors: Arian Kowalski

Abstracts

EN

In this article, I would like to take a closer look at the philosophical meaning of the term “process,” which is a fundamental category in Arnold Mindell’s psychology. The Taoist origins of this concept go back to the Tao – the principle of the universe. Tao is the process of passing into each other the opposite aspects of the monastically understood Qi energy. Mindell was also inspired by the analytical psychology of Carl Gustav Jung, which emphasizes the importance of archetypal, unconscious mental processes and their impact on the ego through random thoughts, fantasies or dreams. Mindell distinguishes between a primary process (mental content that we are aware of) and a secondary process (mental content that we are not aware of) to explain what connects a person with her natural living – an unadulterated existence through rigid boundaries between the two processes acquired during one’s upbringing. The purpose of this article is to explore the Jungian and Taoist roots of Mindell’s psychology and to characterize individual lives as confronting their entire processual being, thus becoming natural living.

Keywords

EN

natural living; process-oriented psychology; wu wei; Arnold Mindell; Carl Gustav Jung; Tao

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
• Journal: Studia Philosophiae Christianae
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 58
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 75-88

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Arian Kowalski

• Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Instytut Filozofii -

• https://orcid.org/000000023813339X

References

• Coward, H. (1996). Taoism and Jung: Synchronicity and the Self. Philosophy East and West, 46(4), 477-495. (https://doi.org/10.2307/1399493).
• Gates, J. (2001). Following the River’s Way. An Interview with Arnold Mindell. The Journal of Process Oriented Psychology, 8(1), 19-23. (http://katejobe.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/rivers-way.pdf).
• Jacobi, J. (1983). The Way of Individuation. New York – Scarborough: New American Library.
• Jacobi, J. (1999). Complex/Archetype/Symbol in the Psychology of C.G. Jung. London – New York: Routledge.
• Jung, C.G. (2014). The Collected Works. New York: Routledge.
• Kimball, J. (1980). Freud, Leonardo, and Joyce: The Dimensions of a Childhood Memory. James Joyce Quarterly, 17(2), 165-182. (https://www.jstor.org/stable/25476276).
• Loy, D. (1985). Wei-Wu-Wei: Nondual Action. Philosophy East and West, 35(1), 73-86. (https://doi.org/10.2307/1398682).
• Mindell, A. (2000). Dreaming While Awake: Techniques for 24-hour Lucid Dreaming. Charlottesville: Hampton Roads Publishing Company.
• Mindell, A. (2010). ProcessMind. A User’s Guide to Connecting with the Mind of God. Wheaton – Chennai: Theosophical Publishing House.
• Mindell, A. (2011). River’s way. The Process Science of the Dreambody. Portland: Deep Democracy Exchange.
• Mitchell, S. (2006). Tao Te Ching. New York – London – Toronto – Sydney: HarperCollins Publishers.
• Ni, P. (1993). The Taoist Concept of Freedom. Grand Valley Review, 9(1), Article 15. (http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/gvr/vol9/iss1/15).
• Odorisio, D.M. (2015). Patañjali’s “Yoga Sūtras” and the Alchemical Process of Individuation. Philosophy East and West, 65(3), 717-730. (https://www.jstor.org/stable/43831170).
• Yu, J. (2008). Living with Nature: Stoicism and Daoism. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 25(1), 1-19. (https://www.jstor.org/stable/27745110).

Identifiers

DOI

10.21697/spch.2022.58.A.11

Biblioteka Nauki

22770330