Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 45 | 319-343

Article title

A study of digital transformation and MSMEs performance from a spatial perspective: Evidence from China

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Aim/purpose – Not only have micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) been regarded as a driving force of the national economy, but they have also become important in promoting innovation and entrepreneurship. In general, today’s MSMEs face problems, such as high business costs, insufficient innovation, and inadequate management capabilities, that have all forced the digital transformation of MSMEs. However, in existing studies, the impact of digital transformation on performance is controversial, and the subjects are generally listed companies. In this paper, we have decided to use micro business survey data and analyze them from a spatial perspective to explore how MSMEs’ digital transformation plays a role in influencing performance and the path of its effect. Design/methodology/approach – We use a sampling method with a dual directory-regional sampling frame to investigate MSMEs in Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China and then delve into the impact of digital transformation on enterprise performance from a spatial perspective by the spatial weighted logit model. Findings – Hierarchical analysis shows that there is a large room for improvement in the Digital transformation of enterprises. The digitalization level of an enterprise has a positive impact on performance. While from a spatial perspective, the digitalization level of neighboring enterprises has a negative impact on the performance of the enterprise. Path analysis shows that the digital transformation of enterprises can increase innovation, reduce costs, and improve the performance of enterprises. Originality/value – We provide an empirical basis for vigorously promoting the digital transformation of enterprises, jointly building digital parks, and improving enterprise performance by reducing costs and improving efficiency. At the same time, it provides relevant suggestions for digital transformation for manufacturing MSMEs that are hesitant to see or are at a loss in the digital transformation and helps manufacturing MSMEs to achieve cost reduction and increase efficiency.

Year

Volume

45

Pages

319-343

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

author
  • Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China
author
  • Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
author
  • Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
author
  • Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China

References

  • Accenture. (2017). Discovering new energy: How China's manufacturing industry wins the digital economy (Report). National Industrial Information Security Development Research Center. http://www.100ec.cn/home/detail--6417934.html.
  • Borah, P. S., Iqbal, S., & Akhtar, S. (2022). Linking social media usage and SME's sustainable performance: The role of digital leadership and innovation capabilities. Technology in Society, 68(3), 101900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101900.
  • Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and enterprise performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983.
  • Buchi, G, Cugno, M., & Castagnoli, R. (2018). Economies of scale and network economies in Industry 4.0 theoretical analysis and future directions of research. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 5(2), 66-76. https://doi.org/10.4468/2018.2.06buchi.cugno.castagnoli.
  • Chen, S. L., & Ma, H. (2017). Peer effects in decision-making evidence from corporate investment. China Journal of Accounting Research, 10(2), 167-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2016.11.002.
  • Chen, C.-L., Lin, Y.-C., Chen, W.-H., Chao, C.-F., & Pandia, H. (2021). Role of government to enhance digital transformation in small service business. Sustainability, 13(3), 1028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031028.
  • Cetindamar Kozanoglu, D., & Abedin, B. (2021). Understanding the role of employees in digital transformation: Conceptualization of digital literacy of employees as a multi-dimensional organizational affordance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(6), 1649-1672. http://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-01-2020-0010.
  • Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2022). SME entrepreneurship and digitalization - the potentialities and moderating role of demographic factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179(5), 121648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121648.
  • Chouki, M., Talea, M., Okar, C., & Chroqui, R. (2022). Barriers to information technology adoption within small and medium enterprises: A systematic literature review. In A. Brem (Ed.), Emerging issues and trends in innovation and technology management (pp. 369-412). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811247729_0015.
  • Dasilva, C. M. (2018). Understanding business model innovation from a practitioner perspective. Journal of Business Research, 6(2), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jbm.v6i2.2456.
  • Do, T. D., Pham, H. A. T., Thalassinos, E. I., & Le, H. A. (2022). The impact of digital transformation on performance: Evidence from Vietnamese commercial banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm.15010021.
  • Ekata, G. E. (2012). The IT productivity paradox: Evidence from the Nigerian banking industry. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 51(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2012.tb00361.x.
  • Garmann-Johnsen, N. F., Helmersen, M., & Eikebrokk, T. R. (2020). Employee-driven digitalization in healthcare: Codesigning services that deliver. Health Policy and Technology, 9(2), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.03.001.
  • Gaglio, C., Kraemer-Mbula, E., & Lorenz, E. (2022). The effects of digital transformation on innovation and productivity: Firm-level evidence of South African manufacturing micro and small enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182(2), 121785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121785.
  • Gillen, A., North Rizza, M., Ballou, M.-C., Chen, G., Dayaratna, A., Lai, L., Little, G., Thomson, J., Mironescu, G., O'Brien, J., Permenter, K., Smith, G., Thomason, M., Zhang, C., & Mercer, J. (2020). IDC FutureScape: Worldwide future of digital innovation 2021 predictions. Doc # US46417320. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp? containerId=US46417320&pageType=PRINTFRIENDLY.
  • Gu, J. (2022). CEO information ability, absorptive capacity, and e-commerce adoption among small, medium, and micro enterprises in China. Sustainability, 14(2), 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14020839.
  • Guo, L., & Xu, L. Y. (2021). The effects of digital transformation on firm performance: Evidence from China's manufacturing sector. Sustainability, 13(22), 12844. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212844.
  • Haefner, L., & Sternberg, R. (2020). Spatial implications of digitization: State of the field and research agenda. Geography Compass, 14(12), e12544. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12544.
  • Hajli, M., Sims, J. M., & Ibragimov, V. (2015). Information Technology (IT) productivity paradox in the 21st century. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(4), 457-478. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2012-0129.
  • Hartl, E., & Hess, T. (2017). The role of cultural values for digital transformation: Insights from a Delphi study. In AMCIS 2017 Proceedings (Vol. 8). https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2017/Global/Presentations/8/.
  • Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesboeck, F. (2016). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 123-139. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291349362_Options_for_Formulating_a_ Digital_Transformation_Strategy.
  • Henderson, D. (2020). Demand-side broadband policy in the context of digital transformation: An examination of SME digital advisory policies in Wales. Telecommunications Policy, 44(9), 102024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102024.
  • Jiang, R. (2014). A trustworthiness evaluation method for software architectures based on the Principle of Maximum Entropy (POME) and the Grey Decision-Making Method (GDMM). Entropy, 16(9), 4818-4838. https://doi.org/10.3390/e16094818.
  • Karimi, J., & Walter, Z. (2015). The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factor-based study of the newspaper industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1), 39-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1029380.
  • Karagiannaki, A., Vergados, G., & Fouskas, K. (2017). The impact of digital transformation in the financial services industry: Insights from an open innovation initiative in Fintech in Greece. Mediterranean Conference on Information System MCIS 2017 Proceedings, 2, 139-150. https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2017/2.
  • Lahane, S. S., Patel, A., & Kant, R. (2021). Prioritising the solutions to overcome Industry 4.0 implementation barriers in the Indian manufacturing industry context. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 14(4), 392-427. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2021.118559.
  • Lassnig, M., Muller, J. M., Klieber, K., Zeisler, A., & Schirl, M. (2021). A digital readiness check for the evaluation of supply chain aspects and company size for Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(9), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2020-0382.
  • Lieberman, M. B., & Asaba, S. (2006). Why do enterprises imitate each other? The Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 366-385. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.20208686.
  • Liu, C. (2022). Key factors identification and path selection of enterprise digital transformation under multicriteria interaction. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2894156. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2894156.
  • Moscalu, M., Girardone, C., & Calabrese, R. (2020). SMEs' growth under financing constraints and banking markets integration in the euro area. Journal of Small Business, 58(4), 707-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1668722.
  • Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. (2018). The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 56(3), 1118-1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1372647.
  • Matarazzo, M., Penco, L., Profumo, G., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Digital transformation and customer value creation in made in Italy SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 123(3), 642-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.033.
  • Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017). Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 70(6), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.004.
  • Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018.
  • Nasiri, M., Ukko, J., Saunila, M., Saunila, M., & Rantala, T. (2020). Managing the digital supply chain: The role of smart technologies. Technovation, 96(7), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102121.
  • National Bureau of Statistics. (2022). MSME Innovation Development Report 2021. http://www.stats.gov.cn/xxgk/gknb/tjj_gknb/202201/t20220129_1827137.html.
  • Mikhridinova, N., Wolff, C., & Hussein, B. (2021). Competences management for the digital transformation: Development of an assessment method. In 11th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS) (pp. 22-25). IEEE. https://iee explore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9660974.
  • OECD Forum on Tax Administration. (2020). Tax administration 3.0: The digital transformation of tax administration (Initial findings). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3ab1789a-en.
  • Pan, X., Xu, G., & Zhu, N. (2022). Spatial peer effect of enterprises' digital transformation: Empirical evidence from spatial autoregressive models. Sustainability, 14(19), 12576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912576.
  • Prasanna, R. P. I. R., Jayasundara, J. M. S. B., Gamage, S. K. N., Ekanayake, E. M. S., Rajapakshe, P. S. K., & Abeyrathne, G. A. K. N. J. (2019). Sustainability of SMEs in the competition: A systemic review on technological challenges and SME performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(4), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5040100.
  • Rupeika-Apoga, R., Petrovska, K., & Bule, L. (2022). The effect of digital orientation and digital capability on digital transformation of SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17(5), 669-685. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17020035.
  • Soto-Acosta, P. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic: Shifting digital transformation to a high-speed gear. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1814461.
  • Sharma, N., & Shastri, S. (2020). From cash to digital wage payments in Vietnam win-win for enterprises and women workers. Women's World Banking/International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/-ed_emp/documents/publication/wcms_748337.pdf.
  • Storey, D. J. (1994). New firm growth and bank financing. Small Business Economics, 6(2), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065186.
  • Tiwasing, P., Kim, Y. R., & Sawang, S. (2022). The interplay between digital social capital and family-owned SME performance: A study of social media business networks. Journal of Family Business Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-07-2022-0103.
  • Thathsarani, U. S., & Jianguo, W. (2022). Do digital finance and the technology acceptance model strengthen financial inclusion and SME performance? Information, 13(8), 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13080390.
  • Teng, X., Wu, Z., & Yang, F. (2022). Research on the relationship between digital transformation and performance of SMEs. Sustainability,14(10),6012. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106012.
  • UNCTAD. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic impact on micro, small and medium-sized enterprises: Market access challenges and competition policy. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditcclp2021d3_en.pdf.
  • Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.
  • Wang, J., Song, Z., & Xue, L. (2023). Digital technology for good: Path and influence - based on the study of ESG performance of listed companies in China. Applied Sciences, 13(5), 2862. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13052862.
  • Winarsih, Indriastuti, M., & Fuad, K. (2021). Impact of Covid-19 on digital transformation and sustainability in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A conceptual framework. In J. Kacprzyk (Ed.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (pp. 471-476). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007 978-3-030-50454-0_48.
  • Xu, H., Ma, C., Lian, J., Xu, K., & Chaima, E. (2018). Urban flooding risk assessment based on an integrated k-means cluster algorithm and improved entropy weight method in the region of Haikou, China. Journal of Hydrology, 563, 975-986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.060
  • Yoshino, N., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2016). Major challenges facing small and medium-sized enterprises in Asia and solutions for mitigating them (Working Papers, No. 564). Asian Development Bank Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2766242
  • Zhai, H., Yang, M., & Chan, K. C. (2022). Does digital transformation enhance a firm's performance? Evidence from China. Technology in Society, 68, 101841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101841.
  • Zhang, X., Xu, Y., & Ma, L. (2022). Research on successful factors and influencing mechanism of the digital transformation in SMES. Sustainability, 14(5), 2549. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052549

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
18721474

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_22367_jem_2023_45_13
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.