Budgetary operating balances in the assessment of the financial aspects of European integration

• Authors: Katarzyna Stabryła-Chudzio

Abstracts

EN

The aim of the study was to assess whether the presentation of financial flows between states and the EU budget provides constructive information, since the literature on the subject emphasizes that the assessment of the benefits and costs of integration has a much broader and more complex scope resulting from the free movement of people, services, goods and capital. In the paper it was used data from 2019 taking into consideration the last year of the UK's full membership in the European Union and a year before COVID-19 pandemic which also has influenced EU finance. In addition, the current operating balances of the member states are presented based on the latest data from 2022 referring to the author’s modified algorithm for calculating operating budgetary balances according to the guidelines of the European Commission. Findings resulting from the conducted research are as follows: referring to the formulated hypotheses it should be stated that there are no grounds to reject them. Correction mechanisms on the revenue side of the European Union budget affect the operating balance of a given country, although they do not have to cause a change in the operating balance from negative to positive or vice versa. In addition operating budgetary balances do not provide a true picture of the benefits and costs of European integration. Providing the value of budget balances for member states in relation to the EU budget should be considered a strictly accounting procedure. The wider use of operating budgetary balances can be considered a denial of the essence of European added value, because they refer to the idea of "fair return" as the expectation of a certain adequacy between the amounts paid and the funds received from the budget.

Keywords

EN

operating budgetary balances; European Union budget; correction mechanism; financial solidarity

• Publisher: Instytut Naukowo-Wydawniczy "SPATIUM"
• Journal: Central European Review of Economics & Finance
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 43
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 37-51

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Katarzyna Stabryła-Chudzio

• Krakow University of Economics

References

• Asatryan, Z., Havlik, A., Heinemann, F., Nover, J., Pilati, M. (2020a). The net operating balances: Variants, emerging numbers and history. Brussels: Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs, Directorate-General for Internal Policies.
• Asatryan, Z., Havlik, A., Heinemann, F., Nover, J. (2020b). Why net operating balances are a distorted indicator of a Member State’s benefit from the EU budget. Brussels: Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, European Parliament.
• Asatryan, Z., Havlik, A., Heinemann, F., Nover, J., Pilati M. (2020c)., The net operating balances or the “Juste retour” approach. Brussels: Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, European Parliament.
• Benedetto, G. (2017). Institutions and the route to reform of the European Union’s budget revenue, 1970–2017. Empirica, 44, pp. 615–633.
• Benedetto, G., Heinemann, F. & Zuleeg, F. (2020). Strategies to overcome the ‘juste retour’ perspective on the EU budget, Brussels: Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs, Directorate-General for Internal Policies.
• Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 of 14 December 2020 on the system of own resources of the European Union and repealing Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom (OJ L 424, 15.12.2020, pp. 1–10).
• Darvas, Z. (2019a). A new look at net balances in the European Union’s next Multiannual financial Framework Bruegel Working Paper, 10.
• Darvas, Z. (2019b). Who pays for the EU budget rebates and why? Bruegel Blog, retrieved July 23, 2023 from: https://bruegel.org/2019/12/who-pays-for-the-eu-budget-rebates-and-why/
• European Commission (2019), EU Budget 2018. Financial Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• Heinemann, F., Pilati, M., Zuleeg, F. (2020). How to overcome the “juste retour”obsession. Brussels: Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, European Parliament.
• https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/eu-budget/long-term-eu-budget/2021-2027/spending-and-revenue_en
• https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/eu-budget/long-term-eu-budget/2021-2027/revenue/rebates_en
• Monti M., Dăianu D., Fuest C., Georgieva K., Kalfin I., Lamassoure A., Moscovici P., S̆imonytė I., Timmermans F. & Verhofstadt G. (2016). Future financing of the EU: final report and recommendations of the High Level Group on Own Resources. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• Oettinger, G. H. & Crețu, C. (2017). Reflection paper on the future of European Union finances. European Commission, COM(2017) 358, Brussels.
• Santos I. & Neheider S. (2009). Reframing the EU budget decision-making process. Bruegel Working Paper, 3.
• Sapała M. (2020). Strengths and Weaknesses of the EU Budget Flexibility ‘toolbox’. in B. L,affan and A. De Feo (Eds.), EU financing for Next Decade. Beyond the MFF 2021–2027 and the Next Generation EU (pp. 253-266). Florence: European University Institute.
• Schout, A., & van Riel A. (2023). The State of Economic in the Eurozone, The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael.
• Schout, A., Molthof, L. & Hollander, S. (2023). The Multiannual Financial Framework. The search for flexibility and recognised effectiveness. The Hague: Clingendael Report, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.
• Stabryła-Chudzio, K. (2022). Kształtowanie europejskiej wartości dodanej w kontekście ponadnarodowych dóbr publicznych, Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/ceref.2023.008

Biblioteka Nauki

30117555