The quality of public finance in the light of fiscal governance concept: implications for the European Union countries

• Authors: Aneta Kargol-Wasiluk , Anna Wildowicz-Giegiel

Abstracts

EN

Research background: The research area on the quality of public finance (QPF) appears to be intellectually attractive. In the light of the challenges of the 21st century, public finance should be characterized by adequate quality, ensuring effective implementation of the economic functions of government. The problem of QPF is increasingly more frequent in the face of a deteriorating fiscal situation of most countries in Europe and around the world. Hence, it is worth considering which factors determine the quality of public finance. Purpose of the article: This article aims to show the possibility of assessing the quality of public finance in the light of fiscal governance concept.  The identification of the key components of QPF seems to be useful from the point of view of empirical research, and can be implemented to assess the quality of public finance in the EU?28. Methods: Descriptive analysis along with principal component analysis (PCA) was implemented to indicate dimensions of QPF. Findings & Value added: The quality of public finance consists of a well-designed fiscal rules (numerical and non-numerical) and institutions, as well as structural reforms. The obtained results allow to characterize the quality of public finance through the prism of six identified principal components. They have a mixed character, two of them are partly or totally related to the institutional aspects of public finance, which proves their importance in the process of improving the quality of public finance. Improving the quality of public finance remains a key challenge for policy makers in the EU. The growing impact of globalization and the aging population also cause the need to improve the qualitative aspects of fiscal policy. The study contributes to the literature on public finance, particularly in the empirical dimension through broadening the knowledge on institutional factors which can be used to measure QPF index. The results of research have certainly enriched the existing knowledge on the phenomenon of QPF and the ways of its measurement.

Keywords

EN

public finance; quality; fiscal governance; principal component analysis

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 411-426

Dates

published

2018

Contributors

author

Aneta Kargol-Wasiluk

• University of Białystok

author

Anna Wildowicz-Giegiel

• University of Białystok

References

• Afonso, A., & Hauptmeier, S. (2009). Fiscal behaviour in the European Union. Rules. Fiscal decentralization and government indebtedness. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 1054.
• Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Fiscal discipline and the budget process. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 86.
• Alt, J., & Lassen, D. (2006). Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. European Economic Review, 50(6).
• Andersen, A., Lassen, D., & Nielsen, L. (2010). Fiscal governance and electoral accountability: evidence from late budgets. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1643449 (30.01.217).
• Barrios, S., & Schaechter, A. (2008). The quality of public finances and economic growth. European Economy – Economic Paper, 337. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/pages/publication13101_en.pdf (27.11.2016).
• Coletta, G., Graziano, C., & Infantino, G. (2015). Do fiscal councils impact fiscal performance? Department of the Treasury. Ministry of the Economy and of Finance Working Papers, 1.
• Debrun, X., Moulin, L., Turrini A., Yuso-i-Casals, J., & Kumar, M. S. (2008). Tied to the mast? National fiscal rules in the European Union. Economic Policy, 23(54).
• Dell'Anno, R., & Dollery, B. (2012). Comparative fiscal illusion: a fiscal illusion index for the European Union. MPRA Paper, 42537.
• Deroose, S., & Kastrop, Dr. C. (ed.). (2008). The quality of public finances. Findings of the EPC Working Group (2004-2007). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication12278_en.pdf (30.01.2017).
• Elassy, N. (2015). The concepts of quality, quality assurance and quality enhancement. Quality Assurance in Education, 23(3). doi:10.1108/QAE-11-2012-0046.
• European Commission. What is fiscal governance? Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/indicators-statistics/economic-databases/fiscal-governance-eu-member-states/what-fiscal-governance_en (10.11.2016).
• Fiscal rules database. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/fiscal-rules-database_en (20.02.2017).
• General government expenditure by function (COFOG). Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=gov_10a_exp&lang=en (20.02.2017).
• Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income - EU-SILC survey. Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ilc_di12 (19.02.2017).
• Giosi, A., Testarmata, S., Brunelli, S., & Stagliano, B. (2014). The dimensions of fiscal governance as the cornerstone of public finance sustainability: a general framework. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 26(1).
• Gleich, H. (2003). Budget institutions and fiscal performance in Central and Eastern European countries. European Central Bank Working Paper, 215.
• Government deficit/surplus, debt and associated data. Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=gov_10dd_edpt1&lang=en (20.02.2017).
• Government revenue, expenditure and main aggregates. Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=gov_10a_main&lang=en (20.02. 2017).
• Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=t2020_20&plugin=1 (20.02.2017).
• Hallerberg, M., Strauch, R. R., & von Hagen, J. (2007). The design of fiscal rules and forms of governance in European Union countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2).
• Hallerberg, M., Strauch, R.R., & von Hagen, J. (2009). Fiscal governance in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO97805117 59505.
• Hameed, F. (2005). Fiscal transparency and economic outcomes. IMF Working Paper, WP/05/225.
• Hoffman, B., & Gibson, C. (2005). Fiscal governance and public services: evidence from Tanzania and Zambia. Retrieved from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/wgape/papers/9_GibsonHoffman.pdf (30.12.2016).
• Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24. doi: 10.1037/h0070888.
• International Country Risk Guide database. Retrieved from http://epub.prsgroup.com/products/international-country-risk-guide-icrg (20.02.2017).
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (1999). Aggregating governance Indicators. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2195.
• Life expectancy by age and sex. Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=demo_mlexpec&lang=en (20.02.2017).
• Medium-term Budgetary Frameworks database. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/medium-term-budgetary-frameworks-database_en (20.02.2017).
• Mourão, P. (2008). Towards a fiscal illusion index. MPRA Paper, 9760.
• Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Nicolo, A., & Chong, A. (2016). Do good institutions improve fiscal transparency? Economics of Governance, 17(3). doi: 10.1007/s10101-015-0175-8.
• Patent applications to the EPO by priority year. Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do (20.02.2017).
• Population aged 25-64 by educational attainment level, sex and NUTS 2 regions (%). Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset= edat_lfse_04&lang=en (20.02.2017).
• Schaechter., A., Kinda., T., Budina, N., & Weber, A. (2012). Fiscal rules in response to the crisis – toward the next generation rules. A new dataset. IMF Working Paper, WP/12/187.
• Soroceanu, M., & Lupascu, C.D. (2011). The European economic plan and quality of public finances – instruments for monitoring and improving fiscal and economic systems. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 7(560).
• Świtalski, W. (2008). Is quality important for economics? Ekonomista, 2.
• Szarowska, I. (2016). Quality of public finance and economic growth in the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(4). doi: 10.11118/actaun201664041373.
• Taxation trends in European Union. Data for the EU member states, Island and Norway (2015). European Union. doi: 10.2785/298426.
• von Hagen, J. (1992). Budgeting procedures and fiscal performance in the Europe-an communities. Economic Papers, 96.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/eq.2018.020

Biblioteka Nauki

22446543