Trade interdependence between Russia vs. the European Union and China within the context of the competitiveness of the Russian economy

• Authors: Krzysztof Falkowski

Abstracts

EN

Research background: The position of a country in the international division of labour is determined by the competitiveness of its trade, the structure of which may both reveal and perpetuate the comparative advantages possessed. This is particularly true for Dutch disease economies such as Russia. Recently, economic literature has seen a growing interest in the topic of Russia?s economic relations with the European Union and China. This article is aimed at being the Author?s contribution to this discussion. Purposes of the article: (1) to discuss the existing trade interdependence between Russia and the EU28, and Russia and China; (2) to try to assess the extent to which the current structure of Russian trade with these two partners corresponds with the competitiveness of the Russian economy. Methods: An in-depth analysis of Russia-EU28 and Russia-China trade interdependencies in 2007-2015 has been conducted, with emphasis on the categories of goods within the spectrum from low- to high-technology, according to the OECD classification. Furthermore, in order to analyse Russia?s competitive profile with regard to the same categories of goods, Balassa?s methodology of revealed comparative advantages has been applied. Findings & Value added: In the recent years, a growing importance of China in Russian trade turnover can be observed, being the effect of dynamic growth of Chinese economy, cooling political relations between Moscow and Brussels and the drop in oil prices in international markets. The existing structure of Russian trade with the EU28 and China seems likely to preserve its traditional competitive advantages in the medium-low-technology goods and oil, which, in turn, will only further exacerbate the negative consequences of the so-called Dutch disease affecting the Russian economy.

Keywords

EN

trade interdependence; competitiveness; competitive advantages; Russia; European Union; China

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 667-687

Dates

published

2018

Contributors

author

Krzysztof Falkowski

• Warsaw School of Economics

References

• Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33.
• Balassa, B. (1989). ‘Revealed’ comparative advantage revisited. In B. Balassa (Ed.). Comparative advantage, trade policy and economic development. New York: New York University Press.
• Bond, I., Odendahl, C., & Rankin, J. (2015). Frozen: the politics and economics of sanctions against Russia. Centre for European Reform.
• Costinot, A., Donaldson, D., & Komunjer, I. (2012). What goods do countries trade? A quantitative exploration of Ricardo’s ideas. Review of Economics Studies, 79(2). doi: 10.1093/restud/rdr033.
• Covi, G. (2014). Dutch disease and sustainability of the Russian political economy. Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment, 2. doi: 10.3280/EFE20 14-002005.
• Crozet, M., & Hinz, J. (2016). Friendly fire – the trade impact of the Russia sanctions and counter-sanctions. Kiel Working Paper, 2059.
• Dalum, B., Laursen, K., & Villumsen, G. (1998). Structural change in OECD export specialization patterns: de-specialization and ‘stickiness’. International Review of Applied Economics, 12(3) doi: 10.1080/02692179800000017.
• Dannreuther, R. (2016). EU-Russia energy relations in context. Geopolitics, 21(4). doi: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1222521.
• Deb, K., & Hauk, W. R. (2017). RCA indices, multinational production and the Ricardian trade model. International Economics and Economic Policy, 14(1). doi: 10.1007/s10368-015-0317-z.
• Dobrynskaya, V., & Turkisch, E. (2010). Economic diversification and Dutch disease in Russia. Post-Communist Economies, 22(3). doi: 10.1080/14631377. 2010.498680.
• Dragneva, R., & Wolczuk, K. (2012). Russia, the Eurasian customs union and the EU: cooperation, stagnation or rivalry? Chatham House Briefing Paper REP BP, 2012/01. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2125913.
• Dülger, F., Lopcu, K., Burgaç, A., & Ballı, E. (2013). Is Russia suffering from Dutch disease? Cointegration with structural break. Resources Policy, 38(4). doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.09.006.
• European Commission. (2014). European competitiveness report 2014 "Helping firms grow". Brussels: European Commission.
• Falkowski, K. (2017). Long-term comparative advantages of the Eurasian Economic Union member states in international trade. International Journal of Management and Economics, 53(4). doi: 10.1515/ijme-2017–0024.
• Falkowski, K. (2018). Competitiveness of the Baltic States in international high‑technology goods trade. Comparative Economic Research, 21(1). doi: 10.2478/cer-2018-0002.
• Gnidchenko, A. A., & Salnikov, V. A. (2015). Net comparative advantage index: overcoming the drawbacks of the existing indices. Higher School of Economics Research Paper, WP BRP 119/EC/2015. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2709009.
• Gregory, P. (2018). A reassessment of Putin's Russia: the economy. South Central Review, 35(1). doi: 10.1353/scr.2018.0009.
• Harsem, O., & Claes, D. H. (2013). The interdependence of European-Russian energy relations. Energy Policy, 59. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.035.
• Hatzichronoglou, T. (1997). Revision of the high technology sector and product classification. STI Working Papers 1997/2.
• Herrero, A. G., & Xu J. (2016). The China-Russia trade relationship and its impact on Europe. Working Paper, 4. Retrieved from http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WP-2016_04-180716.pdf.
• Hinloopen, J., & Van Marrewijk, C. (2001). On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 137. doi: 10.1007/BF02707598.
• Hoen, A. R., & Oosterhaven, J. (2006). On the measurement of comparative advantage. Annals of Regional Science, 40(3). doi: 10.1007/s00168-006-0076-4.
• Huasheng, Z. (2016). Sino-Russian economic cooperation in the Far East and Central Asia since 2012. Eurasia Border Review, 6(1). doi: 10.14943/ebr.6.1.103.
• Iapadre, P. L. (2001). Measuring international specialization. International Advances in Economic Research, 7(2). doi: 10.1007/BF02296007.
• Ito, K. (2017). Dutch disease and Russia. International Economics, 151. doi: 10.1016/j.inteco.2017.04.001.
• Ivanter, V. V. (2018). Prospects of economic development in Russia. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 29(3). doi: 10.1134/S1075700718030061.
• Laursen, K. (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Business Review, 5(1). doi: 10.1007/s40821-015-0017-1.
• Lavrov, S. (2013). State of the Union Russia-EU: prospects for partnership in the changing world. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51. doi: 10.1111/jcms. 12047.
• Liuhto, K. (2015). The economic dependence of EU member states on Russia. In A. Pabriks & A. Kudors (Eds.). The war in Ukraine: lessons for Europe. Riga: University of Latvia Press.
• Locatelli, C., Abbas, M., & Rossiaud S. (2017). The emerging hydrocarbon interdependence between Russia and China: institutional and systemic implications. Europe-Asia Studies, 69(1). doi: 10.1080/09668136.2016.1274020.
• Lukin, A. (2013). Russian-Chinese relations. ISPI Analysis, 167.
• Miller, Ch. (2018). Putinomics. Power and money in resurgent Russia. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
• Mironov, V. V., & Petronevich, A. V. (2015). Discovering the signs of Dutch disease in Russia. Resources Policy, 46(2). doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2015 .09.007.
• Nevskaya, A. (2016). Russia-EU economic relations: assessing two years of sanctions. Retrieved form http://www.russia-direct.org/analysis/russia-eu-economic-relations-assessing-two-years-sanctions.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2011). ISIC Rev. 3 Technology intensity definition. Classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on R&D intensities. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/48350231.pdf.
• Popkova, E. G., & Sukhodolov, Y. A. (2017). Foreign trade as a factor of economic growth. Russian-Chinese foreign trade cooperation. Springer International Publishing.
• Priede, J., & Pereira E. T. (2015). European Union’s competitiveness and export performance in context of EU-Russia political and economic sanctions. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.138.
• Rautava, J. (2011). Russia's economic policy and Russia-China economic relations. In A. Moshes & M. Nojonen (Eds.). Russia-China relations. Current state, alternative futures, and implications for the West. Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
• Romanova, T. (2014). Russian energy in the EU market: bolstered institutions and their effects. Energy Policy, 74. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.07.019.
• Rutland, P. (2014). The impact of sanctions on Russia. Russian Analytical Digest, 157.
• Sidorenko, T. (2014). The scope of economic cooperation between Russia and China and future prospects. Problemas del desarrollo, 45(176).
• Siggel, E. (2006). International competitiveness and comparative advantage: a survey and a proposal for measurement. Journal of Industry, Competitiveness and Trade, 6(2). doi: 10.1007/s10842-006-8430-x.
• Simola, H. (2016). Economic relations between Russia and China – increasing inter-dependency? BOFIT Policy Brief, 6.
• Startiene, G., & Remeikiene, R. (2014). Evaluation of revealed comparative advantage of Lithuanian industry in global markets. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.887.
• Tabata, S. (2012). Observations on Russian exposure to the Dutch disease. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 53(2). doi: 10.2747/1539-7216.53.2.231.
• Tuzova, Y., & Qayum, F. (2016). Global oil glut and sanctions: the impact on Putin’s Russia. Energy Policy, 90. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.008.
• UN Comtrade (2017). United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database. Retrieved from https://comtrade.un.org/.
• Unnikrishnan, N., & Purushothaman, U. (2015). Trends in Russia-China relations. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation.
• Vollrath, T. (1991). A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127(2). doi: 10.1007/BF02707986.
• Wilson, J. L. (2015). Strategic partners: Russian-Chinese relations in the post-Soviet era. New York: Routledge.
• Wilson, J. L. (2016). The Eurasian Economic Union and China’s silk road: implications for the Russian–Chinese relationship. European Politics and Society, 17(1). doi: 10.1080/23745118.2016.1171288.
• Yu, R., Cai, J., & Leung, P. (2009). The normalized revealed comparative advantage index. Annals of Regional Science, 43(1). doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0213-3.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/eq.2018.032

Biblioteka Nauki

22446530