Controlling as a tool for SME management with an emphasis on innovations in the context of Industry 4.0

• Authors: Premysl Pisar , Diana Bilkova

Abstracts

EN

Research background: Small and medium-sized businesses are significant economic power and employer in the European Union. The modern globalized world, new technologies, and advanced connectivity bring SMEs a wide range of opportunities, but also threats. Increasing the stability and competitiveness of SMEs is one of the main goals of national governments and the EU. The research is based on personal research in SMEs, its experiences and backward testing of reached results. Purpose of the article: The aim of the paper is to analyze the possibilities the potential of using controlling as a managing tool of SMEs for increased competitiveness in the context of Industry 4.0  with an emphasis on innovations. Methods: The study is based on a detailed analysis of 341 SMEs from the Czech Republic obtained in the years 2017?2019. The data were analyzed using statistical methods such Pearson correlation, stepwise regression for the purpose of determining the relationship between the controlling management system of a company, its innovation potential, level of process maturity, number of employees, internal audit, financial stability and strategic plan. Statistical analysis confirmed the close relationship of the analyzed variables and backwards experimental testing of the statistical analysis conclusions defined critical factors in the area of people in an organization, usage of advanced information systems and Industry 4.0 technologies implementation. Findings & Value added: Those important areas were determined as essential for the successful development of SMEs, as well as the most significant threats in the Industry 4.0 environment. The information obtained is useful in practice and can be applied to a more in-depth analysis of the issues.  The research findings are showing possible opportunities and treads for SMEs long term stability and development as well as ways to increase enterprise performance based on controlling management system.

Keywords

EN

industry 4.0; controlling; SME; innovation; audit

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 763-785

Dates

published

2019

Contributors

author

Premysl Pisar

• University of Finance and Administration

• https://orcid.org/0000000203744123

author

Diana Bilkova

• University of Economics

• https://orcid.org/0000000313160882

References

• Agostini, L., Nosella, A., & Filippini, R. (2017). Does intellectual capital allow improving innovation performance? A quantitative analysis in the SME context. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2). doi:10.1108/JIC-05-2016-0056.
• Antoniuk, L., Gernego, I., & Sybirianska, Y. (2017). Barriers and opportunities for hi-tech innovative small and medium enterprises development in the 4th industrial revolution era. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(4). doi:10.21511/ppm.15(4).2017.09.
• Babikova, K., & Bucek, J. (2019). A model replication with an extension of students’ perception of prospective employer attractiveness. Journal of Competitiveness, 11(2). doi: 10.7441/joc.2019.02.01.
• Bae, Y., & Chang, H. (2012). Efficiency and effectiveness between open and closed innovation: empirical evidence in South Korean manufacturers. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(10). doi: 10.1080/09537325. 2012.724164.
• Bartok, O. (2018). The use of CSR in e-commerce as a way to compete. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(4). doi: 10.7441/joc.2018.04.01.
• Belas, J., Dvorský, J., Kubálek, J., & Smrčka, L. (2018). Important factors of financial risk in the SME segment. Journal of International Studies, 11(1). doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-1/6.
• Cao, Y., Myers, L. A., Tsang, A., &Yang, Y. G. (2017). Management forecasts and the cost of equity capital: international evidence. Review of Accounting Studies, 22(2). doi: 10.1007/s11142-017-9391-5.
• Darlington, R. B., & Hayes, A. F. (2017). Regression analysis and linear models: concepts, applications, and implementation. New York: The Guilford Press.
• de Salas, K., Lewis, I. J., & Huxley, C. (2017). Using the critical process targeting method to improve SMEs’ process understanding. Business Process Management Journal, 23(2). doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-06-2014-0052.
• Digital Czech Republic (2017). How we grow. Praha: McKinsey & Company Retrieved form https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/digital-czech-republic-how-we-grow (15.06.2019).
• Draheim, D. (2010). Business process technology: A unified view on business processes, workflows and enterprise applications. Berlin: Springer.
• Fetisová, E. (2012). Actual problems of small medium enterprise finance. Bratislava: Ekonóm.
• Goffin, K., & Rick M. (2017). Innovation management: effective strategy and implementation. London: Palgrave.
• Goller, I., & Bessant J. (2017). Creativity for innovation management. New York: Routledge.
• Henttonen, K., & Lehtimäki, H. (2017). Open innovation in SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(2). doi: 10.1108/EJIM-06-2015-0047.
• Ivanová, E., & Čepel, M. (2018). The impact of innovation performance on the competitivenes of the Visegrad 4 countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(1). doi: 10.7441/joc.2018.01.04.
• Jespersen, K., Rigamonti,D., Jensen, M. B., & Bysted, R. (2018). Analysis of SMEs partner proximity preferences for process innovation. Small Business Economics, 51(4). doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9969-0.
• Jo, W. S., Alfnes, E., Strandhagen, J. O., & Logan, R. V. (2017). The fit of industry 4.0 applications in manufacturing logistics: a multiple case study. Advances in Manufacturing, 5(4). doi: 10.1007/s40436-017-0200-y.
• Kamps, T. (2013). Systematic chasing for economic success: an innovation management approach. Hamburg: Anchor.
• Karjalainen, J., Niskanen, M., & Niskanen, J. (2018). The effect of audit partner gender on modified audit opinions. International Journal of Auditing, 22(3). doi: 10.1111/ijau.12130.
• Khudhair, D., Al-Zubaidi, F., & Raji, A. (2019). The effect of board characteristics and audit committee characteristics on audit quality. Management Science Letters. 9(2). doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2018.11.012.
• Kupec, V. (2018). Digital possibilities of internal audit. Acta VŠFS, 11(1).
• Laval, V. (2018). How to increase the value-added of controlling. Berlin: Gruyter.
• Li, P., & Huang, K. (2019). The antecedents of innovation performance: the moderating role of top management team diversity. Baltic Journal of Management, 14(7). doi:10.1108/BJM-07-2017-0202.
• Mahdavi, G., & Abbas, A. D. (2017). Factors affecting the audit process and social theories. Corporate Governance, 17(4). doi:10.1108/CG-04-2016-0079.
• Marjański, A., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2019). The evolution of family entrepreneurship in Poland: main findings based on surveys and interviews from 2009-2018. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(1). doi: 10.15678/EBER. 2019.070106.
• Moeller, R. R. (2011). COSO enterprise risk management: establishing effective governance, risk, and compliance. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
• Müller, J. M., & Däschle, S. (2018). Business model innovation of industry 4.0 solution providers towards customer process innovation. Processes, 6(12). doi: 10.3390/pr6120260.
• Petrů, N., Havlíček, K., & Tomášková, A. (2018). Comparison of marketing vitality of family and non-family companies doing business in Czech republic. Economics & Sociology, 11(2). doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-2/10.
• Písař, P., & Havlíček, K. (2018). Advanced controlling and information systems methods as a tool for cohesion and competitiveness of the European Union. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on European integration 2018. Ostrava: Technical University of Ostrava.
• Řepa, V. (2012). Podnikové procesy – procesnířízení a modelování. Praha: Grada.
• Říhová, L., Písař, P., & Havlíček, K. (2019). Innovation potential of cross-generational creative teams in the EU. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4). doi:10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.04.
• Safar, L., Sopko, J., Bednar, S., & Poklemba, R. (2018). Concept of SME business model for industry 4.0 environment. TEM Journal. 7(3). doi:10.18421/TEM73-20.
• Svensson, E., & Edström, M. (2016). Market-driven challenges to freedom of expression and the interaction between the state, the market, and the media. Nordicom Review, 37(2). doi:10.1515/nor-2016-0013.
• Vitezić, N., & Vitezić, V. (2015). A conceptual model of linkage between innovation management and controlling in the sustainable environment. Journal of Applied Business Research. 31(1). doi: 10.19030/jabr.v31i1.8999.
• Vláda České republiky. (2019). Inovační strategie Českére publiky 2019–2030. retrieved form https://www.vlada.cz/assets/media-centrum/aktualne/III_In ovacni-strategie-CR_Country-for-Future_2019-01-29_cistopis_white.pdf (04.05.2019)
• Weske, M. (2012). Business process management: concepts, languages, architectures. Berlin: Springer.
• Zacharias, N. (2011). An integrative approach to innovation management: Patterns of companies. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/eq.2019.035

Biblioteka Nauki

22446389