Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 16 | 1 | 203-224

Article title

Enhancing emotional engagement through relational contracts, management receptiveness, and employee commitment as a stimulus for job satisfaction and job performance in the public sector

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Research background: In the private sector and on social media, corporate emotional interaction has lately become a hot topic. In the background of the public sector, however, it has scarcely been discussed and very little is known about its determinants and implications. Purpose of the article: This research investigates the role of organizational emotional engagement through relational contracts, senior management receptivity, and upward communication of employees in the public sector in stimulating work satisfaction and job efficiency. Methods: This research was based on data collected between April 1, 2020, and May 31, 2020, from 335 state employees from various governmental organizations in Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), Vietnam. To evaluate the hypothesized model, partial least squares-structural equation modeling was used. Findings & value added: Our results illustrate that relational contracts have a powerful effect on emotional engagement. Positive relationships were confirmed between employee engagement and the voice of employees and between employee engagement and job performance. Moreover, the findings also support the role of senior management receptiveness in stimulating organizational emotional engagement. This study addresses questions about absence of academic studies on organizational emotional engagement in the public sector. The results highlight the important role of emotional engagement in stimulating job satisfaction and job performance through relational contracts, senior management receptiveness, and upward employee communication.

Year

Volume

16

Issue

1

Pages

203-224

Physical description

Dates

published
2021

Contributors

  • Vietnam National University
  • Vietnam National University
  • Vietnam National University
  • Vietnam National University

References

  • Alarcon, G. M., & Lyons, J. B. (2011). The relationship of engagement and job satisfaction in work samples. Journal of Psychology, 14(5), 463?480.
  • Bakker, A. B., & Bal, P. M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: a study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189?206. doi: 10.1348/096317909X402596.
  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209?223. doi: 10.1108/13620430810 870476.
  • Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T. A. M., & De Jong, S. B. (2013). How do developmental and accommodative HRM enhance employee engagement and commitment? The role of psychological contract and SOC strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 50(4), 545?572. doi: 10.1111/joms.12028.
  • Beugré, C. D. (2010). Organizational conditions fostering employee engagement: the role of ?voice.? In S. L. Albrecht, S. L. (Ed.). New horizons in management. Handbook of employee engagement: perspectives, issues, research and practice. Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781849806374.
  • Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307?311. doi: 10.1037/h0055617.
  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Steca, P. (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers? job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 821?832. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.821.
  • Castaneda, G. A., & Scanlan, J. M. (2014). Job satisfaction in nursing: a concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 49(2), 130?138. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12056.
  • Chang, H. T., Hsu, H. M., Liou, J. W., & Tsai, C. T. (2013). Psychological contracts and innovative behavior: a moderated path analysis of work engagement and job resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2120?2135. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12165.
  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity?: basic issues in objective scale development the centrality of psychological measurement. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309?319. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Côté, K., Lauzier, M., & Stinglhamber, F. (2020). The relationship between presenteeism and job satisfaction: a mediated moderation model using work engagement and perceived organizational support. European Management Journal. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.001.
  • De Simone, S., Cicotto, G., Pinna, R., & Giustiniano, L. (2016). Engaging public servants: public service motivation, work engagement and work-related stress. Management Decision, 54(7), 1569?1594. doi: 10.1108/MD-02-2016-0072.
  • Demerouti, E., & Cropanzano, R. (2010). From thought to action: employee work engagement and job performance. In M. P. Leiter & A. B. Bakker (Eds.). Work engagement: a handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press, 147?163.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). Psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.090.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39?50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104.
  • Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2014). Being psychologically present when speaking up: employee voice engagement. In Handbook of research on employee voice. Edward Elger Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9780857939272.00038.
  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2?24. doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Hair, Joe F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares Structural Equation Modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414?433. doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6.
  • Hakanen, J. J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008). Positive gain spirals at work: from job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 78?91. doi: 10.101 6/j.jvb.2008.01.003.
  • Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Wheeler, A. R. (2008). The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave. Work and Stress, 22, 242?256. doi: 10.1080/02678370802383962.
  • Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction?job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376?407. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376.
  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692?724.
  • Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Rand McNally College Pub. Co, 1297?1349.
  • Marchington, M. (2015). Analysing the forces shaping employee involvement and participation (EIP) at organisation level in liberal market economies (LMEs). Human Resource Management Journal, 25(1), 1?18. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583. 12065.
  • Pohl, S., Bertrand, F., & Ergen, C. (2016). Psychological contracts and their implications for job outcomes: a social exchange view. Military Psychology, 28(6), 406?417. doi: 10.1037/mil0000127.
  • Price, K. H., Hall, T. W., Van den Bos, K., Hunton, J. E., Lovett, S., & Tippett, M. J. (2001). Features of the value function for voice and their consistency across participants from four countries: Great Britain, Mexico, The Netherlands, and the United States. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(1), 95?121. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2921.
  • Purcell, J. V., & Hall, M. (2012). Voice and participation in the modern workplace: challenges and prospects. In Acas future of workplace relations discussion paper series. London: Acas.
  • Rees, C., Alfes, K., & Gatenby, M. (2013). Employee voice and engagement: connections and consequences. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(14), 2780?2798. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2013.763843.
  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, Ee. R. (2010). Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617?635. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.51468988.
  • Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. (2004). The drivers of employee engagement. IES Report, 408.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121?139. doi: 10.1007/BF 01384942.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Psychological contract inventory technical report. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324. 004.
  • Rousseau, J. J. (2008). The social contract and the first and second discourses. Yale University Press.
  • Rousseau, D. M., & Tijoriwala, S. A. (1998). Assessing psychological contracts: issues, alternatives and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(S1), 679?695. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(1998)19:1+<679::aid-job971>3.0.co;2-n.
  • Ruck, K., & Welch, M. (2012). Valuing internal communication; management and employee perspectives. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 294?302. doi: 10.1016 /j.pubrev.2011.12.016.
  • Ruck, K., Welch, M., & Menara, B. (2017). Employee voice: an antecedent to organisational engagement? Public Relations Review, 43(5), 904?914. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.008.
  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600?619.
  • Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: the mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217?1227. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217.
  • Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71?92. doi: 10.1023/A:1 015630930326.
  • Soares, M. E., & Mosquera, P. (2019). Fostering work engagement: the role of the psychological contract. Journal of Business Research, 101(August), 469?476. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.003.
  • Steel, B. S., & Warner, R. L. (1990). Job satisfaction among early labor force participants: unexpected outcomes in public and private sector comparisons. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 10(3), 4?22.
  • Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012). Principles and practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology, 1(1), 59?60. doi: 10.15353/cgjsc-rcessc.v1i1.25.
  • Talukder, A. K. M., Vickers, M., & Khan, A. (2018). Supervisor support and work-life balance: impacts on job performance in the Australian financial sector. Personnel Review, 47(3), 727?744. doi: 10.1108/PR-12-2016-0314.
  • Tejpal, P. (2015). Enhancing the job satisfaction level through dimensions of employee engagement: an empirical study on private sector bank managers. Drishtikon: A Management Journal, 7(1), 22?40. doi: 10.21863/drishtikon/201 5.7.1.010.
  • Tourish, D., & Robson, P. (2006). Sensemaking and the distortion of critical upward communication in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 711?730. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00608.x.
  • Truss, K., Soane, E., Edwards, C. Y. L., Wisdom, K., Croll, A., & Burnett, J. (2006). Working life: employee attitudes and engagement 2006. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
  • Truxillo, D. M., Cadiz, D. M., Rineer, J. R., Zaniboni, S., & Fraccaroli, F. (2012). A lifespan perspective on job design: fitting the job and the worker to promote job satisfaction, engagement, and performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(4), 340?360. doi: 10.1177/2041386612454043.
  • Vigan, F. A., & Giauque, D. (2018). Job satisfaction in African public administrations: a systematic review. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(3), 596?610. doi: 10.1177/0020852316651693.
  • Wanrooy, B. van, Bewley, H., Bryson, A., Forth, J., Freeth, S., Stokes, L., & Wood, S. (2011). The 2011 workplace employment relations study. Wers.
  • Welch, M. (2011). The evolution of the employee engagement concept: Communication implications. Corporate Communications, 16(4), 328?346. doi: 10.1108/13563281111186968.
  • Wilcock, A. A. (2001). Occupational science: the key to broadening horizons. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(8), 412?417. doi: 10.1177/030802 260106400808.
  • Wilkinson, A., Dundon, T., Marchington, M., & Ackers, P. (2004). Changing patterns of employee voice: case studies from the UK and Republic of Ireland. Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(3), 298?322. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-1856.2004 .00143.x.
  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601?617. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700305.
  • Wright, B. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: review of current literature and a revised conceptual model. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 11(4), 559?586.
  • Wright, B. E., & Davis, B. S. (2003). Job satisfaction in the public sector: the role of the work environment. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 70?90. doi: 10.1177/0275074002250254.
  • Yeh, C. W. (2012). Relationships among service climate, psychological contract, work engagement and service performance. Journal of Air Transport Management, 25, 67?70. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.08.011.
  • Yongxing, G., Hongfei, D., Baoguo, X., & Lei, M. (2017). Work engagement and job performance: the moderating role of perceived organizational support. Anales de Psicologia, 33(3), 708?713. doi: 10.6018/analesps.33.3.238571.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
22444351

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_24136_eq_2021_008
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.