EU framework programmes: positive and negative effects on member states' innovation performance

• Authors: Meda Andrijauskiene , Daiva Dumciuviene , Alina Stundziene

Abstracts

EN

Research background: Seeking to ensure competitiveness in the global market, the EU is constantly improving its innovation policy. Compared to other EU initiatives, the Framework Programs for Research and Innovation (FPs) act as the main instrument with the longest history and the largest budget to boost member states' innovation performance. Despite the initial presumptions that these financial inflows should bring positive and constructive effects, the results significantly diverge across the countries with highly uneven and incoherent progress. Therefore, complex and reliable tools must be adopted to evaluate the long-term influence of EU investment and the reasons which distort the innovation performance in separate member states. Purpose of the article: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the influence of EU investment on its member states? innovation performance by using a redeveloped national innovative capacity framework and including technological, non-technological and commercial innovative output. Methods: Panel unit root tests were used to assess the time series stationarity. Autoregressive distributed lag models helped in calculating the long-term influence of EU investment on member states? innovation performance. Finally, by employing dummies, it was analysed how this influence varied over time and across different countries. Findings & value added: The findings provide evidence that EU investment exerts positive long-term influence on the technological innovative output proxied as total, business and higher education institutions? patent applications, as well as product and process innovations. The effects were also positive on trademarks and marketing, and organisational innovations. However, small but negative influence was found in the case of patent applications by the government sector and the exports of hi-tech products and knowledge-intensive services. These insights may serve in the designing process of the specific instruments and the future innovation policies, which would bring the maximum benefit for the society and economy.

Keywords

EN

innovation performance; national innovative capacity; EU investment

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 16
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 471-502

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Meda Andrijauskiene

• Kaunas University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000000179996557

author

Daiva Dumciuviene

• Kaunas University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000000235003389

author

Alina Stundziene

• Kaunas University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000000168128471

References

• Adam, F. (2014). Measuring national innovation performance: the innovation Union Scoreboard revisited. Springer.
• Aguiar, L., & Gagnepain, P. (2017). European cooperative R&D and firm performance: evidence based on funding differences in key actions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 53, 1?31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2016.12 .007.
• Alquézar Sabadie, J., & Kwiatkowski, C. (2017). The community innovation survey and the innovation performance of enterprises funded by EU?s framework programmes. Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 44, 3?16. doi: 10.22163/fteval.2017.272.
• Andrijauskiene, M., & Dumciuviene, D. (2018). National culture as a determinant of firms? innovative performance. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 6(1), 47?68.
• Arnold, E., ?ström, T., Boekholt, P., Brown, N., Good, B., Holmberg, R., & van der Veen, G. (2008). Impacts of the Framework Programme in Sweden. Stockholm: VINNOVA.
• Baesu, V., Albulescu, C. T., Farkas, Z. B., & Drăghici, A. (2015). Determinants of the high-tech sector innovation performance in the European Union: a review. Procedia Technology, 19, 371?378. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2015.02.053.
• Barajas, A., Huergo, E., & Moreno, L. (2012). Measuring the economic impact of research joint ventures supported by the EU Framework Programme. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(6), 917?942. doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9222-y.
• Biegelbauer, P., Dinges, M., Wang, A., Weber, M., Ploder, M., Polt, W., Streicher, J., Unger, M., Fischl, I., Kaufmann, P., Gassler, H., Konzett-Smoliner, S., & Schuch, K. (2018). Evaluation of H2020, EUREKA, COSME, EEN and ERA programmes in Austria. Final report. AIT Austrian Institute of Technology Center for Innovation Systems & Policy.
• Boekholt, P. (2009). Impact of the European Framework Programme in the Netherlands, Technopolis Group. Retrieved from: https://www.tweedekamer.nl/do wnloads (05.12.2019).
• Bondonio, D., Biagi, F., & Stancik, J. (2016). Counterfactual impact evaluation of public funding of innovation, investment and R&D (No. JRC99564). Joint Research Centre.
• Bruno, N., & Kadunc, M. (2019). Impact pathways: tracking and communicating the impact of the European Framework Programme for research and innovation. Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 47, 62?71. doi: 10.22163/fteval.2019.330.
• Čučković, N., & Vučković, V. (2018). EU R&D funding as a way of incentivizing innovation of SMEs: a review of impacts. Croatian Economic Survey, 20(2), 97?127. doi: 10.15179/ces.20.2.4.
• Čučković, N., & Vučković, V. (2021). The effects of EU R&I funding on SME innovation and business performance in new EU member states: firm-level evidence. Economic Annals, 66(228), 7?41. doi: 10.2298/EKA2128007C.
• DASTI (2015). Effects of participation in EU framework programmes for research and technological development. Copenhagen: DASTI.
• Dziallas, M., & Blind, K. (2019). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: an extensive literature analysis. Technovation, 80, 3?29. doi: 10.1016/ j.technovation.2018.05.005.
• Ege, A., & Ege, A. Y. (2019). How to create a friendly environment for innovation? A case for Europe. Social Indicators Research, 144(1), 451?473. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-2039-4.
• European Commission (2010). Evaluation of the sixth framework programmes for research and technological development 2002-2006. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/support-policy-maki ng/support-eu-research-and-innovation-policy-making/evaluation-impact-asses sment-and-monitoring/past-framework-programmes_en#fp6 (03.02.2020).
• European Commission (2016). The contribution of the Framework Programmes to major innovations, report to the European Commission. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3fdc6ddc-0528-11e6-b7 13-01aa75ed71a1 (05.02.2020).
• European Commission (2017). Assessment of the Union added value and the economic impact of the EU Framework Programmes. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/pdf/archive/other_reports_studies_and_documents/assessment_of_the_union_added_value_and_the_economic_impact_of_the_eu_framework_programmes.pdf (14.10.2020).
• European Commission (2018). Mutual learning exercise on evaluation of business R&D grant schemes behavioural change, mixed-method approaches and big data. Retrieved from https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/policy-support-facility/mle-evaluation-business-rd-grant-schemes (13.03.2020).
• European Commission (2020a). European Innovation Scoreboard 2002-2020. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/17821 (21.10. 2020).
• European Commission (2020b). EU expenditure and revenue. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/budget/graphs/revenue_expediture.html (15.01.2020).
• European Commission (2021). Horizon Europe. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.e u/info/horizon-europe_en (20.01.2021).
• European Parliament (2018). Overcoming innovation gaps in the EU-13 member states. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ST UD/2018/614537/EPRS_STU(2018)614537_EN.pdf (30.01.2020).
• European Patent Office (2020). Patent statistics. Retrieved from https://www.epo.o rg/about-us/annual-reports-statistics/statistics.html (10.01.2020).
• Eurostat (2020). Official Eurostat database. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/e urostat/data/database (10.01.2020).
• Fisher, R., Chicot, J., Domini, A., Misojic, M., Polt, W., Turk, A., & Goetheer, A. (2018). Mission-oriented research and innovation: assessing the impact of a mission-oriented research and innovation approach. European Commission EC.
• Fisher, R., Polt, W., & Vonortas, N. (2009). The impact of publicly funded research on innovation: an analysis of European Framework Programmes for research and development. Retrieved from http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/ 1264491592_impact_public_research_innovation.pdf (20.11.2019).
• Fresco, L. O., Martinuzzi, A., Anvret, M., Bustelo, M., Butkus, E., Cosnard, M., & Nedeltcheva, V. (2015). Commitment and coherence. Ex-post-evaluation of the 7th EU Framework Programme (2007?2013). Brussels: Report of High Level Expert Group.
• Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899?933. doi: 10.1016/s0048-7333 (01)00152-4.
• Grabowski, W., & Staszewska-Bystrova, A. (2020). The role of public support for innovativeness in SMEs across European countries and sectors of economic activity. Sustainability, 12(10), 4143. doi: 10.3390/joitmc7020120.
• Halkos, G., & Skouloudis, A. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and innovative capacity: intersection in a macro-level perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 291?300. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.022.
• Hottenrott, H., Lopes-Bento, C., & Veugelers, R. (2017). Direct and cross scheme effects in a research and development subsidy program. Research Policy, 46(6), 1118?1132. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2555454.
• Janger, J., Schubert, T., Andries, P., Rammer, C., & Hoskens, M. (2017). The EU 2020 innovation indicator: a step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes? Research Policy, 46(1), 30?42. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.001.
• Khan, R., & Cox, P. (2017). Country culture and national innovation. Archives of Business Research, 5(2). doi: 10.14738/abr.52.2768.
• Kim, J., & Yoo, J. (2019). Science and technology policy research in the EU: from Framework Programme to HORIZON 2020. Social Sciences, 8(5), 153. doi: 10.3390/socsci8050153.
• Law, S. H., Lee, W. C., & Singh, N. (2018). Revisiting the finance-innovation nexus: evidence from a non-linear approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 143?153. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.02.001.
• Lewandowska, M. S., Rószkiewicz, M., & Weresa, M. A. (2018). Additionality from public support to R&D and innovation in the European Union. In M. A. Weresa (Ed.). Strengthening the knowledge base for innovation in the European Union. Warsaw: PWN, 31?58.
• Meissner, D., Polt, W., & Vonortas, N. S. (2017). Towards a broad understanding of innovation and its importance for innovation policy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1184?1211. doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9485-4.
• Min, C. K. (2019). Applied econometrics: a practical guide. Routledge, Taylor & Francis group.
• Napiorkowski, T. M. (2018). The impact of Framework Programs on innovativeness in the European Union. In M. A. Weresa (Ed.). Strengthening the knowledge base for innovation in the European Union. Warsaw: PWN, 59?100.
• Nepelski, D., & Piroli, G. (2018). Organizational diversity and innovation potential of EU-funded research projects. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3), 615?639. doi: 0.1007/s10961-017-9624-6.
• Nielsen K., Farla, K., Rosemberg Montes, Ch., Simmonds, P., & Wain, M. (2017). The role of EU funding in UK research and innovation. Retrieved from https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/Publications/2017/2017-05-technopolis-role-of-EU-funding-report.PDF (28.05.2020).
• Piirainen, K. A., Halme, K., Aström, T., Brown, N., Wain, M., Huovari, J., Kekäläinen, A., Lahtinen, H., Koskela, H., Arnold, E., Boekholt, P., Urth, H.. (2018). How can the EU Framework Programme for research and innovation increase the economic and societal impact of RDI funding in Finland? doi: 10.22163/fteval.2018.321.
• Proksch, D., Haberstroh, M. M., & Pinkwart, A. (2017). Increasing the national innovative capacity: identifying the pathways to success using a comparative method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 256?270. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.009.
• Property Rights Alliance (2019). International property right index. Retrieved from https://www.internationalpropertyrightsindex.org/ (11.01.2020).
• Radicic, D., & Pugh, G. (2017). R&D programmes, policy mix, and the ?European paradox?: evidence from European SMEs. Science and Public Policy, 44(4), 497?512. doi: 0.1093/scipol/scw077.
• Rosemberg, C., Wain, M., Simmonds, P., Mahieu, B., & Farla, K. (2016). Ex-post evaluation of Ireland?s participation in the 7th EU Framework Programme. Final Report. Technopolis group.
• Rubio, E., Zuleeg F., Magdalinski E., Pellerin-Carlin, T., Pilati M., Ständer, P. (2019). Mainstreaming innovation funding in the EU budget. Study. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/s/n9eZ (17. 01. 2020).
• Ryan, T. K., & Schneider, J. W. (2016). Examining to what extent the source of competitive funding influences scientific impact. a case study of Danish EU FP7 funded projects. In 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators-STI 2016. Book of Proceedings. Editorial Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.
• Schuch, K., Polt, W., Weber, M., Martinuzzi, A., Baumgartner, M., Glössl, J.. Herlitschka, S., Höglinger, A., Horvat, M., Lamprecht, K., Nowotny, H., Panholzer, G., Schmid, M., Stampfer, M., & Weiss, B. (2017). Fostering impact and sustainable collaboration in FP9 within a new common research, technology and innovation policy. Wien: Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft. doi: 10.13140/RG. 2.2.31226.49603.
• Simmonds, P., Stroyan, J., Brown, N., & Horvath, A. (2010). The impact of the EU RTD Framework Programme on the UK. Brighton: Technopolis Ltd.
• Stojčić, N., Srhoj, S., & Coad, A. (2020). Innovation procurement as capability-building: evaluating innovation policies in eight Central and Eastern European countries. European Economic Review, 121, 103330. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev .2019.103330.
• Szücs, F. (2018). Research subsidies, industry?university cooperation and innovation. Research Policy, 47(7), 1256?1266. doi:0.1016/j.respol.2018.04.009.
• Van den Besselaar, P. A. A., Flecha, R., & Radauer, A. (2018). Monitoring the impact of EU Framework Programmes. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/ publication-detail/-/publication/cbb7ce39-d66d-11e8-9424-01aa75ed71a1 (02.02.2020).
• Varga, A., & Sebestyén, T. (2017). Does EU Framework Program participation affect regional innovation? The differentiating role of economic development. International Regional Science Review, 40(4), 405?439. doi: 10.1177/01 60017616642821.
• Web of Science (2019). Database. Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/webof sciencegroup/ (04.12.2019).
• Weresa, M. A. (2018). Innovation Union initiative?an overview. In M. A. Weresa (Ed.). Strengthening the knowledge base for innovation in the European Union. Warsaw: PWN, 15?30.
• World Bank (2019). World development indicators. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (05.12.2019).
• World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO, 2020). Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4464 (16.01.2020).

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/eq.2021.017

Biblioteka Nauki

22444331