Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 16 | 4 | 741-764

Article title

Comparison of changes in the labour markets of post-communist countries with other EU member states

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Since 2004, 11 post-communist countries joined the EU. It has helped to strengthen their international competitiveness. This was linked to the implementation of institutional and economic reforms, significant technological changes and improvements in the quality of human capital, as well as fiscal stabilisation policies. These changes affected their situation in the labour market. Purpose of the article: The aim of the study is to assess changes in the situation in the labour market in the EU with particular emphasis on the post-communist countries in the period 2002? 2019. Methods: The situation of countries in the European labour market was estimated using the TOPSIS method. A similarity matrix of changes in the composite variable for each country was then constructed using the Dynamic Time Warping method. On its basis, homogeneous clusters of countries were determined using the Ward's method. Findings & value added: Four homogenous clusters of countries were formed. The post-communist ones belonged to two groups. In one, there were two countries ? Croatia and Slovakia. The rest of the post-communist countries were in a large cluster, which also included Germany, Malta, Finland, Portugal, France and Belgium. Changes of the situation in the post-communist countries in this group improved very much during the analysed period (this was particularly evident for Czechia, Estonia and Poland). It is interesting to investigate whether the reaction of labour markets to changes in the global economic situation in post-communist countries is similar to that in the old EU countries. The similarity of changes can be measured using the DTW method. There is an empirical research gap in this respect. Therefore, the added value is the use of this method in assessing similarities of changes in the labour market situation in post-communist countries in comparison to the Western European ones.

Year

Volume

16

Issue

4

Pages

741-764

Physical description

Dates

published
2021

Contributors

References

  • Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2016a). Quality of institutions for knowledge-based economy within new institutional economics framework. Multiple criteria decision analysis for European countries in the years 2000?2013. Economics & Sociology, 9(4), 66?81. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/4.
  • Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2016b). Structural equation modeling in evaluation of technological potential of European Union countries in the years 2008-2012. In Proceedings of the 10th professor Aleksander Zelias international conference on modelling and forecasting of socio-economic phenomena. Kraków: Foundation of the Cracow University of Economics, 9?18.
  • Balcerzak, A. P., Pietrzak, M. B., & Rogalska, E. (2016). Fiscal contractions in Eurozone in the years 1995?2012: can non-keynesian effects be helpful in future deleverage process? In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, & U. Can (Eds.). Business challenges in the changing economic landscape - Vol. 1. Eurasian Studies in business and economics. Cham: Springer, 483?496.
  • Batóg, J., & Batóg, B. (2016). Application of correspondence analysis to the identification of the influence of features of unemployed persons on the unemployment duration. Economics and Business Review, 2(16)(4), 25?44. doi: 10.1855 9/ebr.2016.4.2.
  • Beesley, C. (2020). The compensation hypothesis goes east: FDI and welfare state demand in postcommunist countries. European Journal of Political Research, 59(2), 354?375. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12349.
  • Bieszk-Stolorz, B., & Dmytrów, K. (2020). Influence of accession of the visegrad group countries to the EU on the situation in their labour markets. Sustainability, 12(16), 6694. doi: 10.3390/su12166694.
  • Crespo, N., & Fontoura, M. P. (2007). Integration of CEECs into EU market: structural change and convergence. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 611?632. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00726.x.
  • Dimian, G. C., Ileanu, B., Jablonsky, J., & Fabry, J. (2013). Analysis of European labour market in the crisis context. Prague Economic Papers, 1. doi: 10.18267/j .pep.440.
  • Dmytrów, K., & Bieszk-Stolorz, B. (2019). Mutual relationships between the unemployment rate and the unemployment duration in the Visegrad Group countries in years 2001?2017. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 14(1), 129?148. doi: 10.24136/eq.2019.006.
  • Dmytrów, K., Gdakowicz, A., & Putek-Szeląg, E. (2019). Statistical relations of the qualitative attributes of real properties subject to mass appraisal. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 19(2), 25?37. doi: 10.2478/foli-2019-0011.
  • Dmytrów, K., Landmesser, J., & Bieszk-Stolorz, B. (2021). The connections between COVID-19 and the energy commodities prices: evidence through the Dynamic Time Warping method. Energies, 14(13), 4024. doi: 10.3390/en1413 4024.
  • Dries, L., Reardon, T., & Swinnen, J. F. M. (2004). The rapid rise of supermarkets in Central and Eastern Europe: implications for the agrifood sector and rural development. Development Policy Review, 22(5), 525?556. doi: 10.1111/j.146 7-7679.2004.00264.x.
  • Ehrke, M. (2007). The European Union and the post-communist sphere. Integration, European neighbourhood policy and strategic partnership. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
  • Enderveen, S., & Thissen, L. (2004). Can labour market institutions explain unemployment rates in new EU member states? CEPS ENEPRI Working Paper, 27/June.
  • Gabrisch, H., & Buscher, H. (2006). The relationship between unemployment and output in post-communist countries. Post-Communist Economies, 18(3), 261?276. doi: 10.1080/14631370600881804.
  • Gajdos, A., Arendt, Ł., Balcerzak, A. P., Pietrzak, M. B. (2020). Future trends of labour market polarisation in Poland. The perspective of 2025. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19, 3(51), 114?135.
  • Giorgino, T. (2009). Computing and visualizing dynamic time warping alignments in R: the dtw package. Journal of Statistical Software, 31(7), 1?24. doi: 10.186 37/jss.v031.i07.
  • Godlewska-Dzioboń, B. (2020). Sectoral employment structure in central and eastern European countries compared to highly developed countries in the European Union. In A. Ujwary-Gil & M. Gancarczyk (Eds.). New challenges in economic policy, business, and management. Warsaw: Institute of Economics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 85?105.
  • Havlik, P. (2005). Structural change, productivity and employment in the New EU member states. Wiiw Research Reports, 313, January.
  • Hellwig, Z. (1972). On optimal choice of predictors. In Z. Gostkowski (Ed.). Towards a system of human resources indicators for less developed countries. Wrocław: UNESCO - Ossolineum, 69?90.
  • Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. A state-of-the-art_survey. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9.
  • Jajuga, K., Walesiak, M., & Bak, A. (2003). On the general distance measure. In M. Schwaiger & O. Opitz (Eds.). Exploratory data analysis in empirical research. Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 104-109. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55721-712.
  • Jakubowski, A. (2018). Convergence or divergence? Multidimensional analysis of regional development in the new European Union member states. Barometr Regionalny, 16(1), 31?40.
  • Jenkins, R. M. (2001). Labor markets and economic transformation in postcommunist Europe. In I. Berg & A. L. Kalleberg (Eds.). Sourcebook of labor markets. Plenum studies in work and industry. Boston, MA: Springer, 135?162. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1225-7_6.
  • Jianu, E., Pîrvu, R., Axinte, G., Toma, O., Cojocaru, A.V., & Murtaza, F. (2021). EU labor market inequalities and sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 13(5), 2675. doi: 10.3390/su13052675.
  • Landmesser, J. (2021a) Analysis of COVID-19 dynamics in EU countries using the Dynamic Time Warping method and ARIMA models. In K. Jajuga, K. Najman, & M. Walesiak (Eds.). Data analysis and classification. SKAD 2020. Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization. Cham: Springer, 337?352. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-75190-6_19.
  • Landmesser, J. (2021b). The use of the dynamic time warping (DTW) method to de-scribe the COVID-19 dynamics in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(3), 539?556. doi: 10.24136/oc.2021.018.
  • Lemos, S., & Portes, J. (2008). New labour? The impact of migration from Central and Eastern European countries on the UK labour market. IZA Discussion Papers, 3756.
  • Lipták, K. (2013). The labour market situation in the Central-Eastern European region ? towards a new labour paradigm. Journal of Geography and Geology, 5(3). doi: 10.5539/jgg.v5n3p88.
  • Lotfi, F. H., & Fallahnejad, R. (2010). Imprecise Shannon?s entropy and multi attribute decision making. Entropy, 12(1), 53?62. doi: 10.3390/e12010053.
  • Monfort, M., Cuestas, J. C., & Ordó?ez, J. (2013). Real convergence in Europe: a cluster analysis. Economic Modelling, 33, 689?694. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod. 2013.05.015.
  • Müller, M. (2007). Information retrieval for music and motion. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74048-3.
  • Novák, Z. (2020). Structural change in Central and South Eastern Europe ? does technological efficiency harm the labour market? Sustainability, 12, 4704. doi: 10.3390/su12114704.
  • Obadić, A., Arčabić V., & Dumančić, L. R. (2021). Labor market institutions convergence in the European Union. EFZG Working Paper Series, 21-02.
  • Pełka, M. (2019). Assessment of the development of the European OECD countries with the application of linear ordering and ensemble clustering of symbolic data. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 19(2), 117?133. doi: 10.2478/foli-2019-0017.
  • Pilc, M. (2017). Cultural, political and economic roots of the labor market institutional framework in the OECD and post-socialist countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(4), 713?731. doi: 10.24136/eq.v12i4.37.
  • Podvezko, V. (2011). The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS. Engineering Economics, 22(2), 134?146. doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.22.2 .310.
  • Rollnik-Sadowska, E., & Dąbrowska, E. (2018). Cluster analysis of effectiveness of labour market policy in the European Union. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(1), 143?158. doi: 10.24136/oc.2018.008.
  • Rollnik-Sadowska, E., & Jarocka, M. (2021). CEE labour markets ? homogeneity or diversity? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(5), 1142?1158. doi: 10.3846/tede.2021.15014.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Saaty, T. L., & Ergu, D. (2015). When is a decision-making method trustworthy? Criteria for evaluating multi-criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 14(6), 1171?1187. doi: 10.1142/S021962201550025X.
  • Salavecz, G., Chandola, T., Pikhart, H., Dragano, N., Siegrist, J., Jöckel, K.-H., Erbel, R., Pajak, A., Malyutina, S., Kubinova, R., Marmot, M., Bobak, M., & Kopp, M. (2010). Work stress and health in Western European and post-communist countries: an East-West comparison study. Journal of Epidemiological Community Health, 64(1), 57?62. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.075 978.
  • Shleifer, A., & Treisman, D. (2014). Normal countries: the east 25 years after communism. Source: Foreign Affairs, 93(6).
  • Stübinger, J. (2019). Statistical arbitrage with optimal causal paths on high-frequency data of the S&P 500. Quantitative Finance, 19(6), 921?935. doi: 10.1080/14697688.2018.1537503.
  • Svabova, L., Tesarova, E. N., Durica, M., & Strakova, L. (2021). Evaluation of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development of the unemployment rate in Slovakia: counterfactual before-after comparison. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(2), 261?284. doi: 10.24136/eq.2021.010.
  • Toots, A., & Bachmann, J. (2010). Contemporary welfare regimes in Baltic States: adapting post-communist conditions to post-modern challenges. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 2(2), 31?44.
  • Wachowicz, T. (2011). Application of TOPSIS methodology to the scoring of negotiation issues measured on the ordinal scale. Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 6, 238?260.
  • Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236?244. doi: 10.108 0/01621459.1963.10500845.
  • Wawrzyniak, K., Bak, I., Cheba, K., & Oesterreich, M. (2020). The similarity of European Union countries in terms of the structure of the unemployed. European Research Studies Journal, 23(4), 416?429. doi: 10.35808/ersj/16 91.
  • Zieliński, M. (2020). The impact of the unemployment level on non-standard employment forms in the Visegrad Group countries. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 19(2), 393?404. doi: 10.12775/eip.2020.027.
  • Żuk, P., & Savelin, L. (2018). Real convergence in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. ECB Occasional Paper, 212.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
22444312

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_24136_eq_2021_027
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.