Inclusiveness as a key determinant of work engagement: evidence from V4 countries

• Authors: Igor Borisov , Szergej Vinogradov

Abstracts

EN

Research background: There is currently a need for empirical research regarding the validity of specific work environment model elements supported by strong statistical evidence. The amount of research conducted in this field has been particularly limited in Central-Eastern Europe. The desire to fill in these gaps was at least in part responsible for the uniqueness of the research approach and its differences from previous similar studies. Purpose of the article: The purpose of this study was to examine factors affecting employee engagement and to examine their relationship with each other using Visegrad countries as an example. Methods: The initial data is taken from the fourth European Company Survey (2019) for management respondents. After data cleaning, the sample sizes for Czechia, Hungary Poland, and Slovakia are N(CZ)=904, N(HU)=682, N(PL)=511, and N(SK)=361, respectively. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), the following five dimensions were identified for this research: (1) inclusiveness, (2) empowerment, (3) work autonomy, (4) organizational learning environment, and (5) work engagement. An analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to determine the links that exist among these dimensions of a constructive work environment. Findings & value added: The structural model indicates that inclusiveness and empowerment have a significant positive impact on work engagement in all the countries examined. Inclusiveness was the strongest predictor of work engagement, followed by empowerment. Both of the two other predictors in the model (workplace autonomy and organizational learning environment) generally had less or no effect on employee engagement. The present study extends recent literature on work engagement by empirically validating the influence of workplace environment-related factors, as well as providing useful organizational policy recommendations for managers.

Keywords

EN

empowerment; workplace autonomy; organizational learning environment; structural equation modeling

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 1015-1050

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Igor Borisov

• Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences

• https://orcid.org/0000000307296716

author

Szergej Vinogradov

• Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences

• https://orcid.org/0000000262423063

References

• Adamonien?, R., Litavniece, L., Ruibyt?, L., & Viduolien?, E. (2021). Influence of individual and organisational variables on the perception of organisational values. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 13(2), 7?17. doi: 10.2478/emj-2021-0008.
• Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., Abd Majid, N., Foziah, H., Ismail, I., Al Halbusi, H., & Tehseen, S. (2021). Gain more in-sight from common latent factor in struc-tural equation modeling. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1793(1), 012030. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1793/1/012030.
• Ahmed, T., Shahid Khan, M., Thitivesa, D., Siraphatthada, Y., & Phumdara, T. (2020). Impact of employees engagement and knowledge sharing on organiza-tional performance: study of HR challenges in COVID-19 pandemic. Human Systems Management, 39(4), 589?601. doi: 10.3233/HSM-201052.
• Alshaabani, A., & Rudnák, I. (2022). Impact of trust on employees? engagement: the mediating role of conflict management climate. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences. Advance online publication. doi: 10.3311/P Pso.18154.
• Andreoni, A., Chang, H. J., & Labrunie, M. (2021). Natura non facit saltus: chal-lenges and opportunities for digital industrialisation across developing coun-tries. European Journal of Development Research, 33(2), 330?370. doi: 10.10 57/s41287-020-00355-z.
• Baldoni, J. (2015). Mindful leaders have moxie. Leader to Leader, 2015(75), 31?36. doi: 10.1002/ltl.20163.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs.
• Blair-Loy, M., & Wharton, A. S. (2002). Employees' use of work-family policies and the workplace social context. Social forces, 80(3), 813?845. doi: 10.1353/s of.2002.0002.
• Blumberg, P. (1969). Industrial democracy: the sociology of participation. Schocken Books.
• Borisov, I., & Vinogradov, S. (2019). The effect of collaboration-oriented manage-rial environment on employee job satisfaction. Journal of Management, 2(35), 5?19.
• Brey, P. (1999). Worker autonomy and the drama of digital networks in organiza-tions. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(1), 15?25.
• Burke, W. (1986). Leadership as empowering others. In S. Srivastra (Ed.). Execu-tive power (pp. 51?77). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Buss, A. R., & Royce, J. R. (1975). Detecting cross-cultural commonalities and differences: intergroup factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 82(1), 128?136. doi: 10.1037/h0076156.
• Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employ-ee involvement in creative tasks in the work-place: the mediating role of psy-chological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250?260. doi: 10.108 0/10400419.2010.504654.
• Cheng, B., Wang, M., Moormann, J., Olaniran, B. A., & Chen, N. S. (2012). The effects of organizational learning environment factors on e-learning ac-ceptance. Computers & Education, 58(3), 885?899. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.014.
• Cheng, H. G., & Phillips, M. R. (2014). Secondary analysis of existing data: oppor-tunities and implementation. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 26(6), 371. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.214171.
• Cheng, J. W., Lu, K. M., Chang, Y. Y., & Johnstone, S. (2013). Voice behavior and work engagement: the moderating role of super-visor?attributed motives. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51(1), 81?102. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00030.x.
• Cho, E. (2016). Making reliability reliable: a systematic approach to reliability coefficients. Organizational Research Methods, 19(4), 651?682. doi: 10.1177/1 094428116656239.
• Cho, S., & Mor Barak, M. E. (2008). Understanding of diversity and inclusion in a perceived homogeneous culture: a study of organizational commitment and job performance among Korean employees. Administration in Social Work, 32(4), 100?126. doi: 10.1080/03643100802293865.
• Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Vecchione, M., Beierlein, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2014). The cross-national invariance properties of a new scale to measure 19 basic human values: a test across eight countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(5), 764?776. doi: 10.1177/0022022114527348.
• Colbert, A. E., Mount, M. K., Harter, J. K., Witt, L., & Barrick, M. R. (2004). Inter-active effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on work-place deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 599?609. doi: 10.1037 /0021-9010.89.4.599.
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297?334.
• Csath, M. (2021). Sustainability requires balanced economic and social develop-ment: the example of the V4 countries. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 5(1), 5?37. doi: 10.53116/pgaflr.2020.1.1.
• Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: is the door really open? Academy of management journal, 50(4), 869?884. doi: 10.17015/ejbe.2018.021.03.
• Eguchi, H., Inoue, A., Kachi, Y., & Tsutsumi, A. (2021). Association between adap-tation of management philosophy and mission statement, and work engage-ment among Japanese workers: a 1-year prospective cohort study in a Japa-nese company. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(9), e601?e604. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002303.
• Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Pub-lic Health, 58(4), 637?642. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3.
• Engbers, T. A., Thompson, M. F., & Slaper, T. F. (2017). Theory and measurement in social capital research. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 537?558. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1299-0.
• Eurofound & Cedefop (2020a). European company survey 2019: workplace prac-tices unlocking employee potential. European company survey 2019 series. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2806/763770.
• Eurofound & Cedefop (2020b). European company survey 2019: technical re-port, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• Findler, L., Wind, L. H., & Barak, M. E. M. (2007). The challenge of workforce management in a global society: modeling the relationship between diversity, inclusion, organizational culture, and employee well-being, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Administration in Social Work, 31(3), 63?94. doi: 10.1300/J147v31n03_05.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing re-search, 18(1), 39?50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104.
• Fotiadis, A., Abdulrahman, K., & Spyridou, A. (2019). The mediating roles of psy-chological autonomy, competence and relatedness on work-life balance and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01267.
• Frayne, C. A., & Geringer, J. M. (2000). Self-management training for improving job performance: a field experiment involving salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 361. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.361.
• Fürstenberg, N., Alfes, K., & Kearney, E. (2021). How and when paradoxical lead-ership benefits work engagement: the role of goal clarity and work autonomy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94, 672?705. doi: 10.1111/joop.12344.
• Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199?223. doi: 10.1023/A:1025007614869.
• Goswami, S., & Goswami, B. K. (2018). Exploring the relationship between work-force diversity, inclusion and employee engagement. Drishtikon: A Management Journal, 9(1), 65?89.
• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic sur-vey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159?170. doi: 10.1037/h0076546.
• Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106?121. doi:10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.
• Hanaysha, J. (2016). Testing the effects of employee engagement, work environ-ment, and organizational learning on organizational commitment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 289?297. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016. 07.139.
• Hardy, C., & Leiba-O?Sullivan, S. (1998). The power behind empowerment: impli-cations for research and practice. Human Relations, 51(4), 451?483. doi: 001872679805100402.
• Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business out-comes: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268. doi: 10.103 7/0021-9010.87.2.268.
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277?319. doi: 10.1037/0033?2909.97.3.562.
• Hislop, D., Bosua, R., & Helms, R. (2018). Knowledge management in organiza-tions: a critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Holcomb, B. (2001). Friendly for whose family? In A. Leckey (Ed.). The best busi-ness stories of the year: 2001 edition (pp. 327?335). New York: Pantheon Books.
• Holland, P., Cooper, B., & Sheehan, C. (2017). Employee voice, supervisor sup-port, and engagement: the mediating role of trust. Human Resource Management, 56(6), 915?929. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21809.
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance struc-ture analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equa-tion Modeling, 6(1), 1?55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
• Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: a review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 16(2), 131?152. doi: 10.1177/0022002185016002001.
• Hulin, C., Netemeyer, R., & Cudeck, R. (2001). Can a reliability coefficient be too high? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(1), 55?58.
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disen-gagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692?724. doi: 10.5465/256287.
• Kausel, E. E., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Narrow personality traits and organization-al attraction: evidence for the complementary hypothesis. Organizational Be-havior and Human Decision Processes, 114(1), 3?14. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2 010.08.002.
• Kimiloglu, H., Ozturan, M., & Kutlu, B. (2017). Perceptions about and attitude toward the usage of e-learning in corporate training. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 339?349. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.062.
• Korsakien?, R., Raišien?, A. G., & Bužavait?, M. (2017). Work engagement of older employees: do employee and work-related factors matter? Economics and Sociology, 10(4), 151?161. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/12.
• Kowalska, A., Kovarnik, J., Hamplova, E., & Prazak, P. (2018). The selected topics for comparison in Visegrad four countries. Economies, 6(3), 50. doi: 10.339 0/economies6030050.
• Kumar, D. P., & Swetha, G. (2011). A prognostic examination of employee en-gagement from its historical roots. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 2(3), 232. doi: 10.7763/IJTEF.2011.V2.108.
• Lam, L. W. (2012). Impact of competitiveness on salespeople's commitment and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1328?1334. doi: 10.1016/j. jbusres.2011.10.026.
• Lambert, S. J., & Waxman, E. (2005). Organizational stratification: distributing opportunities for work-life balance. In E. Kossek & S. Lambert (Eds). Work and life integration: organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 103?126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Leach, D. J., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (2003). The effect of empowerment on job knowledge: an empirical test involving operators of complex technology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(1), 27?52. doi: 10.1348/096317903321208871.
• Lee, J. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement: empirical study of hotel employees and managers. Kansas State University. Retrieved from https://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/13653/JungHoonLe e2012.pdf.
• Lee, Y. K., Kim, S., Son, M. H., & Kim, M. S. (2015). Linking organizational justice to job performance: Evidence from the restaurant industry in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 20(1), 1527?1544. doi: 10.1080/ 10941665.2015.1016052.
• Leydesdorff, L. (2021). The evolutionary dynamics of discursive knowledge: Communication-theoretical perspectives on an empirical philosophy of sci-ence, Springer Nature.
• Li, M., Liu, W., Han, Y., & Zhang, P. (2016). Linking empowering leadership and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organization-al Change Management, 29(5), 793?803 doi: 10.1108/JOCM-07-2015-0116.
• Liu, D., Jiang, K., Shalley, C. E., Keem, S., & Zhou, J. (2016). Motivational mecha-nisms of employee creativity: a meta-analytic examination and theoretical ex-tension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 236?263. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.001.
• Liu, D., Zhang, S., Wang, L., & Lee, T. W. (2011). The effects of autonomy and empowerment on employee turnover: test of a multilevel model in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1305?1316. doi: 10.1037/a0024518.
• Lockwood, N. R. (2006). Talent management: driver for organization success. Research Quarterly, 6(6), 1?13. doi: 10.14738/abr.63.4075.
• Lundvall, B. ?. (Ed.) (2010). National systems of innovation: toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 2). Anthem Press.
• Malhotra, N., & Birks, D. (2018). An applied approach. Marketing research. Geor-gia Institute of Technology: Pearson Education Ltd.
• Markowska-Przybyla, U. (2012). Social capital as an elusive factor of socio-economic development. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(3), 93?103.
• Markwich, C., & Robertson-Smith, G. (2009). Employee engagement. A review of current thinking. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.
• Marquardt, M. J. (2002). Building the learning organization mastering 5 elements for corporate learning. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing, Inc.
• Menguc, B., Auh, S., Fisher, M., & Haddad, A. (2013). To be engaged or not to be engaged: the antecedents and consequences of service employee engagement. Journal of business research, 66(11), 2163?2170. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012. 01.007.
• Mor Barak, M. E. (2000). The inclusive workplace: an ecosystems approach to diversity management. Social Work, 45(4), 339?353.
• Morgeson, F. P., Delaney-Klinger, K., & Hemingway, M. A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 399?406. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.399.
• Mulligan, R., Ramos, J., Martín, P., & Zornoza, A. (2021). Inspiriting innovation: the effects of leader-member exchange (LMX) on innovative behavior as me-diated by mindfulness and work engagement. Sustainability, 13(10), 5409. doi: 10.3390/su13105409.
• Mura, L., Ključnikov, A., Tvaronavičien?, M., & Androniceanu, A. (2017). Devel-opment trends in human resource management in small and medium enter-prises in the Visegrad Group. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 14(7), 105?122. doi: 10.12700/APH.14.7.2017.7.7.
• Nair, N., & Vohra, N. (2015). Diversity and inclusion at the workplace: a review of research and perspectives. Research and Publication Department, Indian Insti-tute of Management, Working Paper, WP2015-03-34.
• Nord, W. R., & Tucker, S. (1987). The organizational dynamics of implementing innovation. Implementing routine and radical innovations. Lexington: Lexing-ton Books.
• Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1?28 doi: 10.2307/2667029.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Com-mon method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. doi: 10.10 37/0021-9010.88.5.879.
• Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., & Kedharnath, U. (2018). Inclusive leader-ship: realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190?203. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002.
• Randolph, W. A., (1995). Navigating the journey to empowerment. Organization-al Dynamics, 24, 19?32.
• Roberson, Q. M. (2006). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 31(2), 212?236.
• Rodin, J., Rennert, K., Solomon, S. K., Baum, A., & Singer, J. E. (1980). Intrinsic motivation for control: fact or fiction. In Advances in environmental psychol-ogy: Vol. 2. Applications of personal control (pp. 131?148). NJ: Erlbaum Hillsdale.
• Salge, C., Glackin, C., & Polani, D. (2014). Empowerment ? an introduction. In M. Prokopenko (Eds.). Guided self-organization: inception. Emergence, complexi-ty and computation (pp. 67?114). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/ 978-3-642-53734-9_4.
• Saragih, S. (2015). The effects of job autonomy on work outcomes: self efficacy as an intervening variable. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 4(3), 203?215. doi: 10.21632/irjbs.4.3.203-215.
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71?92. doi: 10.1023/A: 1015630930326.
• Schwartz, S. H., & Butenko, T. (2014). Values and behavior: validating the refined value theory in Russia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 799?813. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2053C.
• Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organi-zation. New York: Currency Doubleday.
• Shakil, R. M., Memon, M. A., & Ting, H. (2021). Inclusive leadership and innova-tive work behaviour: the mediating role of job autonomy. Quality & Quantity, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01102-0.
• Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Van der Heijden, B. I., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organi-zational climate for innovation and organizational performance: the mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67?77. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004.
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442?1465. doi: 10.2307/256865.
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1992). When organizations dare: the dynamics of individual empowerment in the workplace. Document ID 9308456. University of Michi-gan.
• Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16(5), 537?549. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0153.
• Stankiewicz, J., & Moczulska, M. (2015). The involvement of employees in knowledge management in the light of the research results. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(2), 37?51. doi: 10. 12775/OeC.2015.011.
• Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Weiczorek, S., & Schwartz, S. (2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality & Quantity, 43(4), 599?616. doi: 10.1007/s11135-007-9143-x.
• Suzuki, Y., Tamesue, D., Asahi, K., & Ishikawa, Y. (2015). Grit and work engage-ment: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0137501. doi: 10.1371/j ournal.pone.0137501.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Upper Sad-dle River, NJ: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
• Tang, N., Wang, Y., & Zhang, K. (2017). Values of Chinese generation cohorts: do they matter in the workplace? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143, 8?22. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.007.
• Tannenbaum, A. S. (1986). Back to basics: beyond perception. In R. N. Stern & S. McCarthy (Eds.). International yearbook of organizational democracy for the study of participation, co-operation, and power: Volume III, The organiza-tional practice of democracy (pp. 323?331). New York: John Wiley.
• Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: an ?interpretive? model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666?681. doi: 10.5465/amr.1990.4310926.
• van Tuin, L., Schaufeli, W. B., Van den Broeck, A., & van Rhenen, W. (2020). A corporate purpose as an antecedent to employee motivation and work en-gagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 572343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572 343.
• Vogt, P. (1997). Transfer to power. Credit Union Management, 20(6), 44?45.
• Wang, X., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2007). Influence of demographic factors and ownership type upon organizational learning culture in Chinese enterprises. International Journal of Training and Development, 11(3), 154?165. doi: 10.11 11/j.1468-2419.2007.00278.x.
• Watkins, K., & Marsick, V. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Weiss, M., & Zacher, H. (2022). Why and when does voice lead to increased job engagement? The role of perceived voice appreciation and emotional stability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 132, 103662. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103662.
• Xu, J., & Cooper-Thomas, H. D. (2011). How can leaders achieve high employee engagement? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32(4), 399?416. doi: 10.1108/01437731111134661.
• Yazdani, B. O., Yaghoubi, N. M., & Giri, E. S. P. (2011). Factors affecting the em-powerment of employees. European Journal of Social Sciences, 20(2), 267? 274.
• Zhu, W., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2009). Moderating role of follower characteristics with transformational leadership and follower work engage-ment. Group & Organization Management, 34(5), 590?619. doi: 10.1177/10596011 08331242.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/eq.2022.034

Biblioteka Nauki

22443128