Endogenous money supply, global liquidity and financial transactions: Panel evidence from OECD countries

• Authors: Paweł Śliwiński

Abstracts

EN

Research background: Endogenous money creation is an inherent feature of today?s economies and widely accepted phenomenon. As the various theories of money rely on the money quantity equation, most empirical research is heading towards the analysis of the two-way relationship between the quantity of money and nominal GDP. In today's world, with the extraordinary development of the financial sector, money is used not only for transactions in the real economy, but increasingly also for purchasing financial assets. This observation was absorbed by Werner in the quantity theory of disaggregated credit. Purpose of the article: The aim of the paper is to join the debate on endogenous character of money supply by tasting a disaggregated equation of money. It assumes that the domestic money supply is positively determined not only by growth in GDP-based transactions but also by growth in non-GDP-based transactions (financial transactions). Additionally, it is assumed that in the age of globalization it can be also positively influenced by the global liquidity.  Methods:  Testing of the above-mentioned hypotheses takes place with the use of panel unit roots tests, panel Granger causality test and panel estimations (OLS, models with fixed/random effects, GMM). In the study, annual data from 2002 to 2018 for OECD countries were chosen for statistical research. Findings & value added: The article confirms the hypothesis that real and financial economic activity together with global liquidity positively influence domestic credit and thus money supply. As the amount of money in an economy is driven not only by the real economy but also by the financial economy, prudential regulations that restrict leverage (and thus control the amount of credit) and limit risk-taking during price bubbles periods should be therefore considered. In the research, the reaction of domestic money supply to the changes in US money supply is positive. It confirms the importance of spill-over effect of expansionary policy in major economies to other economies.

Keywords

EN

endogenous money supply; domestic credit; global liquidity; financial transactions; quantity theory of credit

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 18
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 121-152

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Paweł Śliwiński

• Poznań University of Economics and Business

• https://orcid.org/0000000184793252

References

• Allen, F., Beck, T., Carletti, E., Lane, Ph., Schoenmaker, D., & Wagner, W. (2011). Cross-border banking in Europe: Implications for financial stability and mac-roeconomic policies. Center for Economic Policy Research. Retrieved from https://www.uvm.edu/~sgedeon/summer2012/Allen_2011.pdf (10.10.2021).
• Altissimo, F., Georgiou, E., Sastre, T., Valderrama, M. T., Sterne, G., Stocker, M., Weth, M., Whelan, K., & Willman, A. (2005). Wealth and asset price effects on economic activity. ECB Occasional Paper, 29.
• Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Econom-ic Studies, 58(2), 277?297. doi: 10.2307/2297968.
• Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable esti-mation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29?51. doi: 10.101 6/0304-4076(94)01642-D.
• Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2006). The nature and role of monetary policy when money is endogenous. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(6), 847?860. doi: 10.109 3/cje/bel023.
• Asriyan, V., Fornaro, L., Martin, A., & Ventura, J. (2021). Monetary policy for a bubbly world. Review of Economic Studies, 88(3), 1418?1456. doi: 10.1093/restud/ rdaa045.
• Baba, B., & Sevil, G. (2020). The impact of foreign capital shifts on economic activi-ties and asset prices: A threshold VAR approach. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 4(3), 87?104. doi: 10.1108/AJEB-06-2020-0013.
• Badarudin, Z. E., Ariff, M., & Khalid, A.M. (2013). Post-Keynesian money endoge-neity evidence in G7 economies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 33(C), 146?162. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.11.014.
• Baks, K., & Kramer C. (1999). Global liquidity and asset prices: measurement, implications and spillovers. IMF Working Papers, 1999/168.
• Balatti, M., Brooks, C., Clements, M. P., & Kappou, K. (2016). Did quantitative easing only inflate stock prices? Macroeconomic evidence from the US and UK. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2838128.
• Baumeister, Ch., & Benati, L. (2012). Unconventional monetary policy and the Great Recession: Estimating the macroeconomic effects of a spread compres-sion at the zero lower bound. Bank of Canada Working Paper, 2012-21.
• Beckmann, J., Gern, K. J., & Jannsen, N. (2022). Should they stay or should they go? Negative interest rate policies under review. International Economics and Economic Policy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10368-022-00547-4.
• Belke, A., Orth, W., & Setzer, R. (2009). Liquidity and the dynamic pattern of asset price adjustment: a global view. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/eco/43 687355.pdf (10.08.2020).
• Bernanke, B. S., & Kuttner, K. N. (2005). What explains the stock market's reaction to Federal Reserve policy? Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1221?1257. doi: 10.1111/j.15 40-6261.2005.00760.x.
• Bernanke, B. S. (2017). Federal reserve policy in an international context. IMF Economic Review, 65, 1?3. doi: 10.1057/imfer.2016.8.
• Bertaut, C., von Beschwitz, B., & Curcuru, S. (2021). The international role of the US dollar. FEDS Notes. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Re-serve System, October 06, 2021. doi: org/10.17016/2380-7172.2998.
• Buch, C., Vogel, E., & Weigert, B. (2018). Evaluating macroprudential policies. ESBR Working Paper Series, 76. doi: 10.2849/7546.
• Burns, A., Kida, M., Lim, J. J., Mohapatra S., & Stocker, M. (2014). Unconventional monetary policy normalization in high-income countries: Implications for emerging market capital flows and crisis risks. Policy Research Working Paper 6830. doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-6830.
• Butt, N., Churm, R., McMahon, M. F., Morotz, A., & Schanz, J. F. (2015). QE and the bank lending channel in the United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1258.pdf (20.11.2022).
• Carrera, C., Gondo, R., Forero, F. P., & Ramirez-Rondan, N. (2016). Effects of the U.S. quantitative easing over a small open economy. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/ events/ccaconf2014/carrera.pdf (30.11.2020).
• Černohorská, L. (2018). Endogeneity of money: The case of Czech Republic. Journal of International Studies, 11(4), 155?168. doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.
• Chai, H. Y., & Hahn, S. B. (2018). Does monetary policy regime determine the nature of the money supply? Evidence from seven countries in the Asia-Pacific region. East Asian Economic Review, 22(2), 217?239. doi: 10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2018 .22.2.343.
• Chen, Q., Filardo, A., He, D., & Zhu, F. (2016). Financial crisis, US unconventional monetary policy and international spillovers. Journal of International Money and Finance, 67, 62?81. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2015.06.011.
• Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 249?272. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6.
• Clark, T. S., & Linzer, D. A. (2015). Should I use fixed or random effects? Political Science Research and Methods, 3(2), 399?408. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2014.32.
• Cova P., Pagano P., & Pisani M., (2019). Domestic and international effects of the eurosystem expanded asset purchase programme: A structural model based analysis. IMF Economic Review, 67(2), 315?348. doi: 10.1057/s41308-018-0071-7.
• Daripa, A., & Varotto, S. (2010). Ex ante versus ex post regulation of bank capi-tal. In L. P. Blenman, H. A. Black & E. J. Kane (Eds.). Banking and capital markets: New international perspectives (pp. 29?58). Singapore: World Scientific Publish-ing Company.
• Davidson, P., & Weintraub, S. (1973). Money as cause and effect. Economic Journal, 83(332), 1117?1132. doi: 10.2307/2230844.
• Davis, G. F., & Kim, S. (2015). Financialization of the economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 203?221. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112402.
• Davis, J. S., & Devereux, M. B. (2019). Capital controls as macro-prudential policy in a large open economy. NBER Working Paper, 25710. doi: 10.3386/w25710.
• Deleidi, M., & Levrero, E. S. (2017). The money creation process: A theoretical and empirical analysis for the United States. Metroeconomica, International Review of Economics, 70(4), 552?586. doi: 10.1111/meca.12238.
• Dong, F., Miao, J., & Wang, P. (2020). Asset bubbles and monetary policy. Review of Economic Dynamics, 37, S68?S98. doi: 10.1016/j.red.2020.06.003.
• EBC (2010). Enhancing monetary analysis. European Central Bank.
• Economic Affairs Department (2012). The interaction between the financial sys-tem and the real economy. Report from the Economic Affairs Department at the Ministry of Finance. Retrieved from https://www.government.se/49b745/conte ntas-sets/854ee6afbbc94f78bf1e0bbd0401407d/the-interaction-between-the-financ ial-system-and-the-real-economy (20.10.2020).
• Edwards, S. (1999). How effective are capital controls? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4), 65?84. doi: 10.1257/jep.13.4.65.
• Estrella, A., & Mishkin, F.S. (1997). Is there a role for monetary aggregates in the conduct of monetary policy? Journal of Monetary Economics, 40, 279?304. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932(97)00044-5.
• Eviews (2014). EViews 8.1. User guide II. Retrieved from http://www.eviews. com/EViews8/EViews8/EViews%208%20Users%20Guide%20II.pdf (10.03.2020).
• Fabo, B., Jančoková, M., Kempf, E., & Pástor, Ľ. (2021). Fifty shades of QE: Compar-ing findings of central bankers and academics. Journal of Monetary Economics, 120, 1?20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2021.04.001.
• Fisher, I. (1911, [1963]). The purchasing power of money. New York: Macmillan.
• Fontana, G., Realfonzo, R., & Passarella, M. V. (2020). Monetary economics after the global financial crisis: What has happened to the endogenous money theo-ry? European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 17(3), 339?355. doi: 10.4337/ejeep.2020.0056.
• Fratcher, M., Lo Duca, M., & Starub, R. (2013). On the international spillovers of U.S. quantitative easing. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 1557.
• Friedman, M. (1969). Factors affecting the level of interest rates. In Proceeding of the 1968 conference on saving and residential financing (pp. 11?27). Chicago: United States Saving and Loan League.
• Friedman, M. (1970). The counter-revolution in monetary theory. IEA Occasional Paper, 33.
• Friedman, B. M., & Kuttner, K. N. (1996). A price target for U.S. monetary policy? Lessons from the 15 experience with money growth targets. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 77?146. doi: 10.2307/2534647.
• Frost, J., Ito, H., & Van Stralen, R. (2020). The effectiveness of macroprudential policies and capital controls against volatile capital inflows. DNB Working Pa-per, 686.
• Furceri, D., Guichard, S., & Rusticelli, E. (2012). Episodes of large capital inflows, banking and currency crises, and sudden stops. International Finance, 15(1), 1?35, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2362.2012.01296.x.
• Gerding, E. F. (2013). Law, bubbles, and financial regulation. Routledge.
• Giansante, S., Fatouh, M., & Ongena, S. (2019). Does quantitative easing boost bank lending to the real economy or cause other bank asset reallocation? The case of the UK. The Case of the UK (August 18, 2019). Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper, 19?72.
• Goodhardt, Ch., & Hoffmann, B. (2008). House prices, money, credit, and the macroeconomy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(1), 180?205. doi: 10.1093 /oxrep/grn009.
• Gordon, D. B., & Leeper, E. M. (2006). The price level, the quantity theory of mon-ey and the fiscal theory of the price level. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 53(1), 4?27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.2006.00368.x.
• Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relationship by econometric models and cross section special methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37(3), 424?438. doi: 10.2307/1912791.
• Greenspan, A. (2013). The map and the territory: Risk, human nature, and the future of forecasting. Penguin Press.
• Gros, D., Aldici, C., & De Groen, W. P. (2015). Lessons from quantitative easing: Much ado about so little? CEPS Policy Brief, 330.
• Gupta, P. (2016). Capital flows and central banking: The Indian experience. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 7569.
• Haldane, A., Roberts-Sklar, M., Young, C., & Wieladek, T. (2016). QE: the story so far. Bank of England Working Paper 624. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2858204.
• Hanke, M., Huber, J., Kirchler, M., & Sutter, M. (2010). The economic consequences of a Tobin tax?an experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(1-2), 58?71. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.004.
• Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46, 1251?1271. doi: 10.2307/1913827.
• Hayek, F. A. (1933). Monetary theory and the trade cycle. London: London School of Economics and Political Sciences.
• Hook, A. (2022). Examining modern money creation: An institution-centered ex-planation and visualization of the ?credit theory? of money and some reflec-tions on its significance. Journal of Economic Education, 53(3), 210?231. doi: 10.1080/002204 85.2022.2075510.
• Hsiao, Ch. (2022). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press.
• Huber, J. (2020). The hemispheres of finance: GDP and non-GDP finance. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3734917.
• Hudepohl, T., van Lamoen, R., & de Vette, N. (2021). Quantitative easing and exu-berance in stock markets: Evidence from the euro area. Journal of International Money and Finance, 118(C), doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102471.
• Ibarra, R., & Tellez-Leon, I. E. (2020). Are all types of capital flows driven by the same factors? Evidence from Mexico. Empirical Economics, 59(1), 461?502. doi: 10.1007/s00181-019-01624-5.
• Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 115, 53?74. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03) 00092-7.
• IMF (2013). The interaction of monetary and macroprudential policies. Interna-tional Monetary Fund, retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2013/ 012913.pdf (08.10.2020).
• Kaldor, N. (1970). The new monetarism. Lloyds Bank Review, 97, 1?17.
• Kaldor, N. (1982). The scourge of monetarism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Keynes, J. M. (1930). Treatise on money. London: MacMillan.
• Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.
• Kim, S., & Yang D. Y. (2011). The impact of capital inflows on asset prices in emerging Asian economies: Is too much money chasing too little good? Open Economy Review, 22, 293?315. doi: 10.1007/s11079-009-9124-x.
• Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modelling. London: Sage.
• Lane, P. R., & McQuade, P. (2014). Domestic credit growth and international capital flows. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116(1), 218?252. doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12038.
• Lavoie, M. (2019). Advances in the post-Keynesian analysis of money and finance. In P. Arestis & M. Sawyer (Eds.). Frontiers of heterodox macroeconomics (pp. 89?129). Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-23929-9_3.
• Lavoie, M., & Fiebiger, B. (2018). Unconventional monetary policies, with a focus on quantitative easing. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 15(2), 139?146. doi: 10.4337/ejeep.2018.0037.
• Le Bourva, J. (1992). Money creation and credit multipliers. Review of Political Economy, 4(4), 447?466. doi: 10.1080/09538259200000029.
• Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1?24. doi: 10.1016/S0 304-4076(01)00098-7.
• Lopreite, M. (2012). The endogenous money hypothesis: An empirical study of the Euro Area (1999-2010). SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2084197.
• Lyonnet, V., & Werner, R. (2012). Lessons from the Bank of England on ?quantita-tive easing? and other ?unconventional? monetary policies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 25, 94?105. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2012.08.001.
• Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631?652. doi: 10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.13.
• Martin, A., & Ventura, J. (2018). The macroeconomics of rational bubbles: A user's guide. Annual Review of Economics, 10, 505?539. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053534.
• McCallum, B. T., & Nelson, E. (2010). Money and inflation: Some critical issues. In B. M. Friedman & M. Woodford (Ed.). Handbook of monetary economics, edition 1, volume 3 (pp. 97?153). Elsevier.
• Miao, J., & Wang, P. (2018). Asset bubbles and credit constraints. American Economic Review, 108(9), 2590?2628. doi: 10.1257/aer.20160782.
• Minsky H. (1986). Stabilizing an unstable economy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
• Moore, B. (1983). Unpacking the post Keynesian black box: Bank lending and the money supply. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5(4), 537?556. doi: 10.1080 /01603477.1983.11489391.
• Moore, B. (1988). Horizontalists and verticalists: The macroeconomics of credit money, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Moran, M., & Flaherty, E. (2022). Rethinking the concept of a ?financial elite?: A critical intervention. Critical Sociology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177 /08969205221143317.
• Mušinský, T., & Siničáková, M. (2020). Endogeneity of money and non-conventional single monetary policy in the context of ongoing crisis in three Central European countries. In Proceedings of FIKUSZ symposium for young re-searchers (pp. 55?66). Óbuda University Keleti Károly Faculty of Economics.
• Nayan, S., Kadir, N., Abdullah, M. S., & Ahamad, M. (2013). Post Keynesian en-dogeneity of money supply: Panel evidence. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7, 48?54. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00217-7.
• Palley, T. I. (1994). Competing views of the money supply process: Theory and evidence. Metroeconomica, 45(1), 67?88. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.1994.tb00013.x.
• Phillips, P. C., & Shi, S. (2020). Real time monitoring of asset markets: Bubbles and crises. In Handbook of statistics (Vol. 42) (pp. 61?80). Elsevier.
• Ponomarenko, A. (2019). Do sterilized foreign exchange interventions create money? Journal of Asian Economics, 62, 1?16. doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2019.03.001.
• Rapih, S. (2021). How international capital inflows and domestic financial institu-tional development affect domestic credit: Evidence from developing coun-tries, Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 2007614. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2021.2007614.
• Reinhart, C. M., & Reinhart, V. R. (2008). Capital inflows and reserve accumula-tion: The recent evidence. NBER Working Paper, 13842.
• Reis, R. (2016). Funding quantitative easing to target inflation. CFM Discussion Paper Series, CFM-DP2016-26.
• Reisenbichler, A. (2020). The politics of quantitative easing and housing stimulus by the Federal Reserve and European Central Bank, 2008?2018. West European Politics, 43(2), 464?484. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2019.1612160.
• Rey, H. (2016). International channels of transmission of monetary policy and the Mundellian trilemma. IMF Economic Review, 64(1), 6?35. doi: 10.1057/imfer.20 16.4 .
• Rigobon, R., & Sack, B. (2003). Measuring the reaction of monetary policy to the stock market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 639?669. doi: 10.1162/003355 303321675473.
• Robinson, J. (1956). The accumulation of capital. London: Macmillan.
• Rodrigo, F., Bortz, P., & Colophon, N. Z. (2018). The politics of quantitative easing. A critical assessment of the harmful impact of European monetary policy on developing countries, SOMO. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/36967 301/The_politics_of_quantitative_easing_A_critical_assesment_of_the_harmful_impact_of_European_monetary_policy_on_developing_countries (08.01.2021).
• Rossi, S. (2019). The dangerous ineffectiveness of negative interest rates: The case of Switzerland. Review of Keynesian Economics, 7(2), 220?232. doi: 10.4337/roke.2019. 02.07.
• Rüffer, R., & Stracca, L. (2006). What is global excess liquidity, and does it matter? European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 696.
• Ryan-Collins, J., Werner, R. A., & Castle, J. (2016). A half-century diversion of monetary policy? An empirical horse-race to identify the UK variable most likely to deliver the desired nominal GDP growth rate. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 43, 158?176. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2016.03.009.
• Sawyer, M. (2020). Endogenous money in an era of financialization. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 17(3), 356?366. doi: 10.433 7/ejeep.2020.0057.
• Senner, R., & Surbek, O. (2022). From the quantity theory of money towards the functional differentiation of credit: the role of non-GDP transactions in Ger-many, Italy and Switzerland. Retrieved from https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/v_2022_ 10_21_senner.pdf (20.01.2023).
• Shiller, R. J. (2016). Irrational exuberance. Princeton University Press.
• Sieroń, A. (2019). Endogenous versus exogenous money: Does the debate really matter? Research in Economics, 73(4), 329?38. doi: 10.1016/j.rie.2019.10 .003.
• Smith, A. (2012). The wealth of nations: An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Ware: Wordsworth Editions.
• Tchorek, G., Brzozowski, M., & Śliwiński, P. (2017). Determinants of capital flows to emerging and advanced economies between 1990 and 2011. Portuguese Eco-nomic Journal, 16(1), 17?48. doi: 10.1007/s10258-016-0126-5.
• Tori, D., & Onaran, Ö. (2018). The effects of financialization on investment: Evi-dence from firm-level data for the UK. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(5), 1393?416. doi: 10.1093/cje/bex085.
• Weale, M., & Wieladek, T., (2016), What are the macroeconomic effects of asset purchases? Journal of Monetary Economics, 79(C), 81?93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.20 16.03.010.
• Werner, R. A. (1997). Towards a new monetary paradigm: A quantity theorem of disaggregated credit, with evidence from Japan. Credit and Capital Markets?Kredit und Kapital, 30(2), 276?309.
• Werner, R. (2005). New paradigm in macroeconomics: Solving the riddle of Japanese mac-roeconomic performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Werner, R. (2012). Towards a new research programme on banking and the econ-omy ? implications of the quantity theory of credit for the prevention and res-olution of banking and debt crises. International Review of Financial Analysis, 25, 94?105. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2012.06.002.
• Werner, R. A. (2013). Towards a more stable and sustainable financial architec-ture?a discussion and application of the quantity theory of credit. Credit and Capital Markets?Kredit und Kapital, 46(3), 357?387. doi: 10.3790/ccm.46.3.357.
• Wicksell, K. (1898). Interest and prices: A study of the causes regulating the value of money. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
• Woodford, M. (2004). Inflation targeting and optimal monetary policy. Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 86, 15?42. doi: 10.20955/r.86.15-42.
• Wooldridge, J (2012). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Mason: South-Western.
• Wray L. R. (1992). Commercial banks, the central bank, and endogenous money. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 14(3). doi: 10.1080/01603477.1992.11489900.
• Yao, J., Ma, C., & He, W.P. (2014). Investor herding behaviour of Chinese stock market. International. Review of Economics and Finance, 29(1), 12?29. doi: 10.1016/ j.iref.2013.03.002.
• Xiao, J., Juodis, A., Karavias, Y., Sarafidis, V., & Ditzen, J. (2022). Improved tests for Granger non-causality in panel data. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA Pa-per, 114231.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/eq.2023.004

Biblioteka Nauki

22443112