Asymmetry and convergence in the development of digital technologies in the EU countries

• Authors: Irina Kolupaieva , Larysa Tiesheva

Abstracts

EN

Research background: Digitalization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated significantly across Europe, including in regions that are at the stage of catch-up development. However, as innovative technologies are intensively integrated into everyday life, the digital gap between the EU countries is increasing. The widening digital gap is becoming a serious threat to achieving the EU's sustainable development goals and building a sustainable European society. Purpose of the article: The purpose of the article was to empirically substantiate the inclusiveness and convergence of the digital strategy in the EU countries. Methods: Using the method of fuzzy sets, the level of asymmetry in access to transactional            (e-commerce), information (cloud computing), operational (artificial intelligence) technologies in the EU countries was assessed. The negative impact of the digital gap within the countries (the gap between small, medium, large companies) and the global digital gap (the gap between EU countries) on the competitiveness of countries was established, for which correlation analysis and the Granger causality test were used. Findings & value added: The findings of this study contribute to the literature of digital transformation and digital gap of European countries. The impact of the digital gap in transactional, information, operational technologies on the competitiveness of countries is differentiated depending on the level of digitalization of the country. Cluster groups of countries are determined by the convergence of digitalization and ways to ensure long-term competitiveness. The directions for reducing the digital gap in the EU countries are substantiated by changing the priorities of spending on innovation and increasing productivity, diversifying the digital technologies used. The empirical results obtained can serve as a basis for improving the effectiveness of the digitalization policy in the EU countries in accordance with individual convergence goals. The main added value of the paper is related to the presented research procedure, which can be used in analyses of digital technologies development also for other countries. The results provide valuable insights into evaluating the digital technologies in European countries.

Keywords

EN

EU; digitalization; digital gap; digital technologies; convergence; digital strategy; competitiveness

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 18
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 687-716

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Irina Kolupaieva

• Linkoping University

• https://orcid.org/0000000312560817

author

Larysa Tiesheva

• V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

• https://orcid.org/0000000320079150

References

• Acılar, A., Koca, G., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2011). Digital divide among enterprises in a developing country. International Journal of Ebusiness and Egovernment Studies, 3, 2.
• Adamek, J., & Solarz, M. (2023). Adoption factors in digital lending services offered by FinTech lenders. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 169–212.
• Akande, A., Cabral, P., & Casteleyn, S. (2019). Assessing the gap between technology and the environmental sustainability of European Cities. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 581–604.
• Aytekin, A., Ecer, F., Korucuk, S., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2022). Global innovation efficiency assessment of EU member and candidate countries via DEA-EATWIOS multi-criteria methodology. Technology in Society, 68, 101896.
• Appiah-Otoo, I., & Song, N. (2021). The impact of ICT on economic growth-comparing rich and poor countries. Telecommunications Policy, 45(1), 102082.
• Bickley, S. J., Macintyre, A., & Torgler, B. (2021). Artificial intelligence and big data in sustainable entrepreneurship. CREMA Working Paper Series, 2021b-11.
• Bonsón, E., Lavorato, D., Lamboglia, R., & Mancini, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence activities and ethical approaches in leading listed companies in the European Union. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 43, 100535.
• Brunet-Thornton, R., Cramer, T., & Jirsák, P. (2019). A research agenda on Czech attitudinal perspectives in an era of digital transformation. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 6(1), 99–112.
• Carlsson, V., & Rönnblom, M. (2022). From politics to ethics: Transformations in EU policies on digital technology. Technology in Society, 71, 102145.
• Civelek, M., Krajčík, V., & Ključnikov, A. (2023). The impacts of dynamic capabilities on SMEs’ digital transformation process: The resource-based view perspective. Oeconomia Copernicana. Advance online publication. 10.24136/oc.2023.019.
• Cunningham, C. J. L., Weathington, B. L., & Pittenger, D. J. (2013). Understanding and conducting research in the health sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Dondapati, A., Sheoliha, N., Panduro-Ramirez, J., Bakhare, R., Sreejith, P. M., & Devi Prasad Kotni, V. V. (2022). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for knowledge production and B2B marketing rational analysis for enhancing business performance. Materials Today: Proceedings, 56, 4, 2232–2235.
• European Commission (2022). Shaping Europe’s digital future. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/connectivity.
• Eurostat (2022a). Database. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/ data/database.
• Eurostat (2022b). Structural business statistics overview. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Structural_bus iness_statistics_overview.
• Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.
• Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2018). Studying confgurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 18(3), 482–495.
• Gavkalova, N., Kolupaieva, I., & Barka, Z. M. (2017). Analysis of the efficiency of levers in the context of implementation of the state regulatory policy. Economic Annals-XXI, 165(5-6), 41–46.
• Guo, C., & Wan, B. (2022). The digital divide in online learning in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology in Society, 71, 102122.
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Hallward-Driemeier, M., Nayyar, G., Fengler, W., Aridi, A., Gill, I., & Aridi, A. (2020). Europe 4.0: Addressing the digital dilemma. Washington, DC: World Bank..
• Hung, B. Q., Nham, N. T. H., & Ha, L. T. (2023). The importance of digitalization in powering environmental innovation performance of European countries. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1).
• Krawczak, M., & Szkatuła, G. (2020). On matching of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 517, 254–274.
• Kučera, J., & Fiľa, M. (2022). R&D expenditure, innovation performance and economic development of the EU countries. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 227–241.
• Liao, S.-C., Chou, T.-C., & Huang, C.-H. (2022). Revisiting the development trajectory of the digital divide: A main path analysis approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121607.
• Liu, M., Li, C., Wang, S., & Li, Q. (2023). Digital transformation, risk-taking, and innovation: Evidence from data on listed enterprises in China. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100332.
• Luo, Y., Cui, H., Zhong, H., & Wei, C. (2023). Business environment and enterprise digital transformation. Finance Research Letters, 57, 104250.
• Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359.
• Ma, T., Zhang, S., Zhu, S., Ni, J., Wu, Q., & Liu, M. (2022). The new role of nursing in digital inclusion: Reflections on smartphone use and willingness to increase digital skills among Chinese older adults. Geriatric Nursing, 48, 118–126.
• Malkowska, A., Urbaniec, M., & Kosala, M. (2021). The impact of digital transformation on European countries: Insights from a comparative analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(2), 325–355.
• Marhraoui, M. A. (2023). Digital skills for project managers: A systematic literature Review. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 1591–1598.
• Marti, L., & Puertas, R. (2023). Analysis of European competitiveness based on its innovative capacity and digitalization level. Technology in Society, 72, 102206.
• Megits, N., Neskorodieva, I., & Schuster, J. (2020). Impact assessment of the COVID-19 on trade between Eastern Europe and China. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 7(3), 385–399.
• Nadoleanu, G., Stăiculescu, A. R., & Bran, E. (2022). The multifaceted challenges of the digital transformation: Creating a sustainable society. Postmodern Openings, 13, 300–316.
• Nosratabadi, S., Atobishi, T., & Hegedűs, S. (2023). Social sustainability of digital transformation: Empirical evidence from EU-27 countries. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), 126.
• Ordanini, A., Parasuraman, A., & Rubera, G. (2014). When the recipe is more important than the ingredients a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) of service innovation confgurations. Journal of Service Research, 17(2), 134–149.
• Pappas, I. O. (2018). User experience in personalized online shopping: A fuzzy-set analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 52(7/8), 1679–1703.
• Pappas, I. O., Kourouthanassis, P. E., Giannakos, M. N., & Chrissikopoulos, V. (2016). Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 794–803.
• Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310.
• Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2022). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal.
• Pliskin, N., Levy, M., Heart, T., O’Flaherty, B., & O’Dea, P. (2006). The corporate digital divide between smaller and larger firms. In E. M. Trauth, D. Howcroft, T. Butler, B. Fitzgerald & J. I. DeGross (Eds). Social inclusion: Societal and organizational implications for information systems. (pp. 413–417). Boston: Springer.
• Polozova, T., Kolupaieva, I., & Sheiko, I. (2021). Digital gap in EU countries and its impact on labour productivity and global competitiveness. In Hradec economic days, part 1 (pp. 569–570). Hradec Králové: University of Hradec Králové.
• PwC (2012). Maximizing the impact of digitization. Retrieved from https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/m1/en/reports/2011-2014/maximizing-impac t-digitization.html.
• Rajbhandari, A., & Zhang, F. (2021). Does energy efficiency promote economic growth? Evidence from a multi-country and multi-sector panel data set. World Bank Group.
• Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., & Hussein, S. (2023). A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon, 9(4), e14878.
• Sánchez-Torres, J. A. (2019). Moderating effect of the digital divide of e-commerce. International Journal of Social Economics, 46, 12, 1387–1400.
• Schmitt, A. K., Grawe, A., & Woodside, A. G. (2017). Illustrating the power of fsQCA in explaining paradoxical consumer environmental orientations. Psychology & Marketing, 34(3), 323–334.
• Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics, 39(2), 145–168.
• Skare, M., & Riberio Soriano, D. (2021). How globalization is changing digital technology adoption: An international perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 222–233.
• Sun, C., Lin, Z., Vochozka, M., & Vincúrová, Z. (2022). Digital transformation and corporate cash holdings in China’s A-share listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1081–1116.
• Sun, C., Zhang, Z., Vochozka, M. ., & Vozňáková, I. (2022). Enterprise digital transformation and debt financing cost in China’s Ashare listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(3), 783–829.
• The World Bank Group (2020). Europe 4.0: Addressing Europe's digital dilemma. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/eca/publication/addressi ng-europes-digital-dilemma.
• Tutak, M., & Brodny, J. (2022). Business digital maturity in Europe and its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8, 1, 27.
• Ulas, D. (2019). Digital transformation process and SMEs. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 662–671.
• Van Kessel, R., Wong, B .L. H., Rubinić, I., O’Nuallain, E., & Czabanowska, K. (2022). Is Europe prepared to go digital? Making the case for developing digital capacity: An exploratory analysis of Eurostat survey data. PLOS Digit Health, 1(2), e0000013.
• Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.
• Woodside, A. G. (2017). The complexity turn: Cultural, management, and marketing applications. Berlin: Springer.
• World Economic Forum (2022). 70% of homes in the EU have high-speed internet – but a digital divide persists. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/ 2022/09/eu-high-speed-internet-digital-divide/.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/eq.2023.022

Biblioteka Nauki

22398184