Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 9 | 3 | 461-475

Article title

Agile approach in a transforming organization, a descriptive study of chosen Polish companies with rapid revenue growth

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Research background: Recent decades may undoubtedly be deemed as a period of exceptional transformation on a global scale. One element of this transformation is the reorganisation of traditional ways of business management (on all ontological levels). As a result, agile approach is increasingly often considered one of the key aspects of building the competitive advantage of a company. In this paper, agile approach is understood as the businesses' capability of responding promptly to market needs. Purpose of the article: The aim of this paper is to present the research results on the use of agile approach in chosen organizations. More specifically, the main purpose of this article is to describe how organizations are transformed with use of the agile approach. Methods: In accordance with the goal of the article, the organizations selected for empirical research are characterized by revenue increase levels of over 100% (such organizations undergo a dynamic transformation caused by growth), and employment ranging from 10 to 50 employees. The studied companies operate mainly in the IT industry and use technologies to organize the processes of identification and tracking of customer behaviour to a large extent. Several research methods were used in this paper: literature studies, expert interview, participant observation, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Findings & Value added: The article describes the usage level of the agile (and linear) approach in the organizational transformation (through the dynamic growth of revenues), and presents the agile approach model, which can be used as an accelerator of the business' development. In addition, the authors undertook the first (limited and unrepresentative) attempt to evaluate the use of agile approach in the context of such indicators as: communication with customers, profit increase, and minimization of the risk related to introducing a new product on the market.

Year

Volume

9

Issue

3

Pages

461-475

Physical description

Dates

published
2018

Contributors

  • University School of Physical Education in Wrocław
  • University School of Physical Education in Wrocław

References

  • Agile manifesto. Retrieved from http://agilemanifesto.org/ (13.03.2017).
  • Berger, H., & Beynon-Davies, P., (2009). The utility of rapid application development in large-scale, complex projects. Information Systems Journal, 19(6). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00329.x.
  • Blank, S., (2006). Four steps to the epiphany, successful strategies for products that win. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/e145/cgi-bin/winter/drupal/upload/handouts/Four_Steps.pdf (13.03.2017).
  • Boehm, B., & Turner, R. (2004). Balancing agility and discipline: a guide for the perplexed. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
  • Cheng‐Hsui, Chen, A. (2001). Using free association to examine the relationship between the characteristics of brand associations and brand equity. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10(7). doi: 10.1108/10610420110410559.
  • Cooper, R. G. (2016). Agile-Stage-Gate hybrids. Research-Technology Management, 59(1). doi: 10.1080/08956308.2016.1117317.
  • Dikert, K., Paasivaaraa, M., & Lassenius C. (2016). Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: a systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 119.
  • Dingsøyr, T., & Moe, N. (2013). Research challenges in large-scale agile software development. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 38(5).
  • Euchner, J. (2013). What large companies can learn from startups, an interview with Eric Ries. Research-Technology Management, April-August.
  • Ignatius, A. (2016). Toward a more agile future. Harvard Business Review, 94(5).
  • Ivanov, C. I., & Avasilcăi, S. (2014). Measuring the performance of innovation processes: a balanced scorecard perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109.
  • Kumar, V. (2008). Managing customers for profit: strategies to increase profits and build loyalty. New Jersey: Wharton School Publishing.
  • Janoskova, K., & Krizanova, A. (2017). Comparison of selected internationally recognized brand valuation methods. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(1). doi: 10.24136/oc.v8i1.7.
  • Lean business model canvas. Retrieved from https://blog.leanstack.com/why-lean-canvas-vs-business-model-canvas-af62c0f250f0#.47sxk7dgn dn. (13.03.2017).
  • Paasivaara, M., Durasiewicz, S., & Lassenius, C. (2008). Using scrum in a globally distributed project: a case study. Software Process Improvement and Practice 13(6).
  • Pope-Ruark, R. (2015). Introducing agile project management strategies in technical and professional communication courses. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(1). Doi: 10.1177/1050651914548456.
  • Rappaport, A. (1999). Creating shareholder value: the new standard for business performance. New York, USA: The Free Press.
  • Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: how today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business.
  • Sherehiy, B., & Karwowski, W. (2014). The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.002.
  • Skulme, R., & Praude, V. (2016). Social media evaluation metrics. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(1). doi: 10.12775/OeC.2016.009.
  • Sultan, F., & Rohn, A.J. (2004). The evolving role of the Internet in marketing strategy: an exploratory study. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(2). doi: 10.1002/dir.20003.
  • Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: a guidebook and resource. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Walliman, N. (2011). Research methods: the basics. New York: Rout ledge.
  • Wendler, R. (2013), The structure and components of agility – a multi-perspective view. Business Informatics, 28.
  • Yin, R. K. (2004). Case study research: design and methods (Applied Social Research Methods). London and Singapore: Sage.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
18864540

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_24136_oc_2018_023
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.