Hysteresis and stochastic convergence in Eurozone unemployment rates: evidence from panel unit roots with smooth breaks and asymmetric dynamics

• Authors: Aysegul Corakci , Tolga Omay , Mubariz Hasanov

Abstracts

EN

Research background: Studying the dynamic characteristics of unemployment rate is crucial for both economic theory and macroeconomic policies. Despite numerous research, the empirical evidence about stochastic behaviour of the unemployment rate remains disputable. It has been widely agreed that most economic variables, including unemployment rates, are characterized by both structural breaks and nonlinearities. However, a little work is done to examine both features simultaneously. Purpose of the article: In this paper, we analyse the stationarity properties of unemployment rates of Euro area member countries. Also, we aim to test stochastic convergence of unemployment rates among member countries. Our empirical procedures explicitly allow for simultaneous gradual breaks and nonlinearities in the series. Methods: This paper develops a new unit root test procedure for panel data, allowing for both gradual structural breaks and asymmetric adjustment towards equilibrium. We carry out Monte Carlo simulations to examine small sample performance of the proposed test procedure and compare it to the existing test procedures. We apply the newly proposed test to examine the stochastic properties of the unemployment rates of Euro-member countries as well as relative unemployment rates vis-à-vis the Eurozone unemployment rate. Findings & value added: We find that the newly developed test procedure outperforms existing tests in highly nonlinear settings. Also, these tests reject the null hypothesis of unit root in more cases when compared to the existing tests. We find stationarity in the series only after allowing for structural breaks in the data generating process. Allowing for nonlinear and asymmetric adjustment in addition to gradual breaks provides evidence of stationarity in more cases. Furthermore, our results suggest that relative unemployment rate series are stationary, providing evidence in favour of stochastic convergence in unemployment rates. Overall, our results imply a limited room for coordinated economic policy to fight unemployment in the Eurozone.

Keywords

EN

unemployment hysteresis; stochastic convergence; gradual breaks; asymmetric adjustment; panel unit root

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Oeconomia Copernicana
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 11-54

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Aysegul Corakci

• Çankaya University

• https://orcid.org/0000000206844103

author

Tolga Omay

• Atılım University

• https://orcid.org/0000000302632258

author

Mubariz Hasanov

• Piri Reis University

• https://orcid.org/0000000302169531

References

• Akdoğan, K. (2017). Unemployment hysteresis and structural change in Eu-rope. Empirical Economics, 53(4), 1415?1440. doi: 10.1007/s00181-016-1171-8.
• Bai, J., & Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L. (2009). Structural changes, common stochastic trends, and unit roots in panel data. Review of Economic Studies, 76(2), 471?501. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00530.x.
• Basawa, I. V., Mallik, A. K., McCormick, W. P., Reeves, J. H., & Taylor, R. L. (1991). Bootstrapping unstable first order autoregressive processes. Annals of Statistics, 19(2), 1098?1101. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176348142.
• Beyer, R. C. M., & Stemmer, M. A. (2016). Polarization or convergence? An analysis of regional unemployment disparities in Europe over time. Economic Modelling, 56(c), 373?381. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.02.027.
• Blanchard, O. J., & Summers, L. (1986). Hysteresis and the European unemployment problem. In S. Fischer (Ed.). NBER macroeconomics annual. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 15?78.
• Blanchard, O. J. (1991). Wage bargaining and unemployment persistence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 23(3), 277?292. doi: 10.2307/1992746.
• Blanchard, O. J., & Katz. L. F. (1997). What we know and do not know about the natural rate of unemployment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 51?72. doi: 10.1257/jep.11.1.51.
• Brunello, G. (1990). Hysteresis and the Japanese unemployment problem: a pre-liminary investigation. Oxford Economic Papers, 42(3), 483?500. doi: 10.1093/ oxfordjournals.oep.a041959.
• Caner, M., & Hansen, B.E. (2001). Threshold autoregression with a unit root. Econometrica, 69(6), 1555?1596. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00257.
• Camarero, M., & Tamarit, C. (2004). Hysteresis vs. natural rate of unemployment: new evidence for OECD countries. Economics Letters, 84(3), 413?417. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2004.02.014.
• Carrera, D. R., & Rodriguez, G. (2009). Have European unemployment rates con-verged? Banco Central de Reserva del Perú Working Papers, 2009-007.
• Cerrato, M., Peretti. C. De., & Sarantis, N. (2007). A nonlinear panel unit root test under cross section dependence. Centre for International Capital Markets Discussion Papers, 2007-14.
• Chang, T. (2011). Hysteresis in unemployment for 17 OECD countries: stationary test with a fourier function. Economic Modelling, 28(5), 2208?2214. doi: 10.10 16/j.econmod.2011.06.002.
• Chortareas, G., & Kapetanios, G. (2009). Getting PPP right: identifying mean-reverting real exchange rates in panels. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(2), 390?404. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.08.010.
• Çağlayan Akay., E., Oskonbaeva, Z., & Bülbül, H. (2020). What do unit root tests tell us about unemployment hysteresis in transition economies? Applied Economic Analysis, 28(84), 221?238. doi: 10.1108/AEA-05-2020-0048.
• Delong, B. J., & Summers, L. H. (2012). Fiscal policy in a depressed economy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 43(1), 233?297. doi: 10.1353/eca.2 012.0000.
• Emirmahmutoglu, F., & Omay, T. (2014). Reexamining the PPP hypothesis: a nonlinear asymmetric heterogeneous panel unit root test. Economic Modelling, 40, 184?190. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.03.028.
• Estrada, Á., Galí, J., & López-Salido, D. (2013). Patterns of convergence and divergence in the euro area. IMF Economic Review, 61(4), 601?663. doi: 10.1057/imfer.2013.22.
• European Commission (2020). European economic forecast: European economy (Report No. 132). Economic and financial affairs. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/european-economic-forecast-summer-202 0en.
• Franchia, M., & Ordó?ez, J. (2008). Common smooth transition trend-stationarity in European unemployment. Economics Letters, 101(2), 106?109. doi: 10.1016 /j.econlet.2008.06.018.
• Friedman, M. (1968). The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 58(1), 1?17.
• Furuoka, F. (2017). A new test for analysing hysteresis in European unemployment. Applied Economics Letters, 24(15), 1102?1106. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2016.1257209.
• Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53?74. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076( 03)00092-7.
• Im, K. S., Lee, J., & Tieslau, M. (2005). Panel LM unit-root tests with level shifts. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 393?419. doi: 10.1111/j.14 68-0084.2005.00125.x.
• Jiang, Y., Yifei, C., Peng, Y-T., & Chang, T. (2019). Testing hysteresis in unemployment in G7 countries using quantile unit root test with both sharp shifts and smooth breaks. Social Indicators Research, 142(3), 1211?1229. doi: 10.1007/s1 1205-018-1948-6.
• Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., & Snell, A. (2003). Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112(2), 359?379. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00202-6.
• Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. London: MacMillan.
• Kónya, L. (2020). Did the unemployment rates converge in the EU? Empirical Economics, 59(2), 627?657. doi: 10.1007/s00181-019-01678-5.
• Koop, G., & Potter, S. M. (1999). Dynamic asymmetries in US unemployment. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 17(3), 298?312. doi: 10.1080/073 50015.1999.10524819.
• Krištić, I. R., Dumančić, L. R., & Arčabić, V. (2019). Persistence and stochastic convergence of euro area unemployment rates. Economic Modelling, 76, 192?198. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2018.07.032.
• Kutan A. M., & Yigit, T. M. (2005). Real and nominal stochastic convergence: are the new EU members ready to join the Euro zone? Journal of Comparative Economics, 33(2), 387?400. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2005.03.001.
• Lee, C., Wu, J-L., & Yang, L. (2016). A simple panel unit-root test with smooth breaks in the presence of a multifactor error structure. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 78(3), 365?393. doi: 10.1111/obes.12109.
• Lee, C-C., & Chang, C.P. (2008). Unemployment hysteresis in OECD countries: centurial time series evidence with structural breaks. Economic Modelling, 25(2), 312?325. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2007.06.002.
• Lee, C-F. (2010). Testing for unemployment hysteresis in nonlinear heterogeneous panel: international evidence. Economic Modelling, 27(5), 1097?1102. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2010.03.010.
• León-Ledesma, M. A., & McAdam, P. (2004). Unemployment, hysteresis and transition. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51(3), 377?401. doi: 10.1111/j.0036-9292.2004.00311.x.
• Leybourne, S., Newbold, P., & Vougas, D. (1998). Unit roots and smooth transitions. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(1), 83?97. doi: 10.1111/1467-9892.00078.
• Lukianenko, I., Oliskevych, M., & Bazhenova, O. (2020). Regime switching modeling of unemployment rate in Eastern Europe. Ekonomický časopis, 68(4), 380?408.
• Luukkonen, R., Saikkonen, P., & Terasvirta, T. (1988). Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models. Biometrika, 75(3), 491?99. doi: 10.10 93/biomet/75.3.491.
• Meng, M., Strazicich, M. C., & Lee, J. (2017). Hysteresis in unemployment? Evidence from linear and nonlinear unit root tests and tests with non-normal errors. Empirical Economics, 53(4), 1399?1414. doi: 10.1007/s00181-016-1196-z.
• Mitchell, W. F. (1993). Testing for unit roots and persistence in OECD unemployment rates. Applied Economics, 25(12), 1489?1501. doi: 10.1080/00036849300 000153.
• Modigliani, F., & Papademos, L. (1975). Targets for monetary policy in the coming year. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 6(1), 141?165. doi: 10.2307/ 2534063.
• Neftçi, S. (1984). Are economic time series asymmetric over the business cycle? Journal of Political Economy, 92(2), 307?328. doi: 10.1086/261226.
• Omay, T., Emirmahmutoglu, F., & Hasanov, M. (2018a). Structural break, non-linearity and asymmetry: a re-examination of PPP proposition. Applied Economics, 50(12), 1289?1308. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2017.1361005.
• Omay, T., Hasanov, M., & Shin, Y. (2018b). Testing for unit roots in dynamic panels with smooth breaks and cross-sectionally dependent errors. Computational Economics, 52(1), 167?193. doi: 10.1007/s10614-017-966 7-7.
• Omay, T., Shahbaz, M., & Stewart, C. (2021). Is there really hysteresis in the OECD unemployment rates? New evidence using a Fourier panel unit root test. Empirica, 48(4), 875?901. doi: 10.1007/s10663-021-09510-z.
• O'Shaughnessy, T. (2011). Hysteresis in unemployment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27(2), 312?337. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grr018.
• Perez-Alonso, A., & Di Sanzo, S. (2011). Unemployment and hysteresis: a non-linear unobserved components approach. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 15(1), 1?29. doi: 10.2202/1558-3708.1806.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Paper in Economics, 0435.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967?1012. doi: 10.111 1/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265?312. doi: 10.1002/jae.951.
• Phelps, E. S. (1967). Phillips curves, expectations of inflation, and optimal unemployment over time. Economica, 34(135), 254?281. doi: 10.2307/2552025.
• Røed, K. (1996). Unemployment hysteresis - macro evidence from 16 OECD countries. Empirical Economics, 21(4), 589?600. doi: 10.1007/BF01180703.
• Røed, K. (1997). Hysteresis in unemployment. Journal of Economic Surveys, 11(4), 389?418. doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00040.
• Rothman, P. (1991). Further evidence on the asymmetric behaviour of unemployment rates over the business cycle. Journal of Macroeconomics, 13(2), 291?298. doi: 10.1016/0164-0704(91)90057-2.
• Sessions, J. G. (1994). Unemployment stigma and multiple labour market equilibria: a social-psychological interpretation of hysteresis. Labour, 8(3), 355?375. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9914.1994.tb00168.x.
• Skalin, J., & Terasvirta, T. (2002). Modelling asymmetries and moving equilibria in unemployment rates. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 6(2), 202?241. doi: 10.101 7/S1365100502031024.
• Sollis, R. (2009). A simple unit root test against asymmetric star nonlinearity with an application to real exchange rates in Nordic countries. Economic Modelling, 26(1), 118?125. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2008.06.002.
• Song, F. M., & Wu, Y. (1998). Hysteresis unemployment: evidence from OECD countries. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 38(2), 181?192. doi: 10.1016/S1062-9769(99)80111-2.
• Stine, R. A. (1987). Estimating properties of autoregressive forecasts. Journal of American Statistical Association, 82(400), 1072?1078. doi: 10.2307/2289383.
• Terasvirta, T. (1994). Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transiwtion autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(425), 208?218. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1994.10476462.
• Ucar, N., & Omay, T. (2009). Testing for unit root in nonlinear heterogeneous panels. Economics Letters, 104(1), 5?8. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.018.
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2020). Unemployment rate [UNRATE]. Labor force statistics from the Current Population Survey. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE (10.7.2020).
• Vendrik, M. C. M. (1993). Habits, hysteresis and catastrophes in labor supply. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 20(3), 353?372. doi: 10.101 6/0167-2681(93)90031-J.
• Yaya, O. S., Ogbonna, A. E., Furuoka, F., & Gil?Alana, L. A. (2021). A new unit root test for unemployment hysteresis based on the autoregressive neural net-work. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 960?981. doi: 10.11 11/obes.12422.
• Yılancı, V. (2008). Are unemployment rates nonstationary or nonlinear? evidence from 19 OECD countries. Economics Bulletin, 3(47), 1?5.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/oc.2022.001

Biblioteka Nauki

19322486