Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 14 | 1 | 135-168

Article title

Post-Brexit exchange rate volatility and its impact on UK exports to eurozone countries: A bounds testing approach

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Research background: The Brexit referendum had a profound effect on the economic relations between the United Kingdom (UK) and continental Europe. Major economic and financial determinants were affected, including the impact of the GBP/EUR exchange rate volatility on the dynamics of UK exports to the Eurozone. Purpose of the article: This paper seeks to assess the extent to which these dynamics have changed since Brexit and to estimate the magnitude of their impact. Methods: To this end, the volatility behavior of the GBP/EUR exchange rate before and after Brexit is captured using EWMA, GARCH(p,q), and EGARCH(p,q) models for the period of January 1, 2010 to August 31, 2020. The post-Brexit change in the volatility structure of GBP/EUR exchange rates is then tested by including a dummy in the optimal volatility model. Finally, the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Bounds Testing approach is employed to analyze the relationships between exchange rate volatility and exports. Findings & value added: GARCH(1,1) was selected as the winning model and used to examine the volatility structure of the post-Brexit exchange rate, which revealed no significant change. By incorporating a well-grounded proxy for exchange rate volatility into the demand function of exports, and controlling for the industrial production index, terms of trade, and real exchange rate, the analysis showed that exchange rate volatility had a negative impact on export volume to the Eurozone in both the long and short run. Additionally, the industrial production index had a positive effect on export volume in both the long and short run, while an appreciation in the value of the pound relative to the euro adversely affected the competitiveness of UK exports in the Eurozone market in the long run, with no impact in the short run. This paper serves as a benchmark for future studies, as it follows a three-step modeling approach and provides valuable insights into the potential economic and financial consequences a European Union (EU) member state may face should it choose to exit the EU.

Keywords

Year

Volume

14

Issue

1

Pages

135-168

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

author
  • Notre Dame University, Lebanon
author
  • Notre Dame University, Lebanon
  • Lebanese American University, Lebanon
  • University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain
author
  • Notre Dame University, Lebanon

References

  • Aftab, M., & Rehman, I. U. (2017). Exchange rate risk and the bilateral trade between Malaysia and Singapore. Studies in Economics and Finance, 34(3), 407?426. doi: 10.1108/SEF-08-2015-0188.
  • Aftab, M., Syed, K. B. S., Ahmad, R., & Ismail, I. (2016). Exchange-rate variability and industry trade flows between Malaysia and Japan. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 25(4), 453?478. doi: 10.1080/09638199.2015.10 65901.
  • Aftab, M., Syed, K. B. S., & Katper, N. A. (2017). Exchange-rate volatility and Ma-laysian-Thai bilateral industry trade flows. Journal of Economic Studies, 44(1), 99?114. doi: 10.1108/JES-05-2015-0091.
  • Aristotelous, K., Aristotelous, & Kyriacos. (2001). Exchange-rate volatility, ex-change-rate regime, and trade volume: Evidence from the UK-US export func-tion (1889-1999). Economics Letters, 72(1), 87?94. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00 414-1.
  • Arize, A. C. (1995). Trade flows and real exchange-rate volatility: An application of cointegration and error-correction modeling. North American Journal of Eco-nomics and Finance, 6(1), 37?51. doi: 10.1016/1062-9408(95)90004-7.
  • Arize, A. C., & Malindretos, J. (1998). The long-run and short-run effects of ex-change-rate volatility on exports: The case of Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Economics and Finance, 22(2?3), 43?56. doi: 10.1007/BF02771475.
  • Arize, Augustine C, Osang, T., & Slottje, D. J. (2000). Exchange-rate volatility and foreign trade: Evidence from thirteen LDC?s. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 18(1), 10?17. doi: 10.1080/07350015.2000.10524843.
  • Asseery, A., & Peel, D. A. (1991). The effects of exchange rate volatility on exports. Some new estimates. Economics Letters, 37(2), 173?177. doi: 10.1016/0165-1765(91) 90127-7.
  • Asteriou, D., Masatci, K., & Pilbeam, K. (2016). Exchange rate volatility and inter-national trade: International evidence from the MINT countries. Economic Modelling, 58, 133?140. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.006.
  • Baek, J. (2014). Exchange rate effects on Korea-U.S. bilateral trade: A new look. Research in Economics, 68(3), 214?221. doi: 10.1016/j.rie.2014.05.002.
  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Aftab, M. (2017). On the asymmetric effects of exchange rate volatility on trade flows: New evidence from US-Malaysia trade at the in-dustry level. Economic Modelling, 63, 86?103. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.02.004.
  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Huynh, T., & Nasir, M.A., (2018). On the asymmetric effects of exchange?rate volatility on trade flows: Evidence from US?UK Commodity Trade. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 68(1), 51?102. doi: 10.1111/sjpe.12257.
  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Iqbal, J., & Salam, M. (2016). Short run and long run effects of exchange rate volatility on commodity trade between Pakistan and Japan. Economic Analysis and Policy, 52, 131?142. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2016.09.002.
  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Gelan, A. (2018). Exchange-rate volatility and interna-tional trade performance: Evidence from 12 African countries. Economic Analy-sis and Policy, 58, 14?21. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2017.12.005.
  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Kanitpong, T. (2019). Thailand-China commodity trade and exchange rate uncertainty: Asymmetric evidence from 45 industries. Jour-nal of Economic Asymmetries, 20, e00130. doi: 10.1016/j.jeca.2019.e00130.
  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Karamelikli, H. (2022a). Exchange rate volatility and commodity trade between UK and China: An asymmetric analysis. Chinese Economy, 55(1), 41?65. doi: 10.1080/10971475.2021.1892919.
  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Karamelikli, H. (2022b). UK-German commodity trade and exchange-rate volatility: An asymmetric analysis. International Trade Jour-nal, 36(4), 288?305. doi: 10.1080/08853908.2021.1947923.
  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Saha, S. (2021). On the asymmetric effects of exchange rate volatility on the trade flows of India with each of its fourteen partners. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 14(1), 66?85. doi: 10.1080/17520843.2020.1765826.
  • Broll, U., & Eckwert, B. (1999). Exchange rate volatility and international trade. Southern Economic Journal, 66(1), 178. doi: 10.2307/1060843.
  • Chi, J. (2020). Asymmetric exchange rate effects on cross-border freight flows between the United States and Canada. Transportation Research Record, 2674(4), 348?361. doi: 10.1177/0361198120912242.
  • Chi, J., & Cheng, S. K. (2016). Do exchange rate volatility and income affect Aus-tralia?s maritime export flows to Asia? Transport Policy, 47, 13?21. doi: 10.1016/j.tr anpol.2015.12.003.
  • Choudhry, T. (2008). Exchange rate volatility and United Kingdom trade: Evidence from Canada, Japan and New Zealand. Empirical Economics, 35(3), 607?619. doi: 10.1007/s00181-008-0185-2.
  • Chowdhury, A. R. (1993). Does exchange rate volatility depress trade flows? Evi-dence from error-correction models. Review of Economics & Statistics, 75(4), 700?706. doi: 10.2307/2110025.
  • Clark, P. B. (1973). Uncertainty, exchange risk, and the level of international trade. Economic Inquiry, 11(3), 302?313. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1973.tb01063.x.
  • Cushman, D. O. (1986). Has exchange risk depressed international trade? The impact of third-country exchange risk. Journal of International Money and Finance, 5(3), 361?379. doi: 10.1016/0261-5606(86)90035-5.
  • Dellas, H., & Zilberfarb, B.-Z. (1993). Real exchange rate volatility and interna-tional trade: A reexamination of the theory. Southern Economic Journal, 59(4), 641. doi: 10.2307/1059729.
  • Doǧanlar, M. (2002). Estimating the impact of exchange rate volatility on exports: Evidence from Asian countries. Applied Economics Letters, 9(13), 859?863. doi: 10.1080/13504850210150906.
  • Ekanayake, E. M., Ledgerwood, J. R., & D?Souza, S. (2010). The real exchange rate volatility and U.S. exports: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 4(1), 23?35. doi: 10.51240/jibe.2010.1.3.
  • Goldstein, M., & Khan, M. S. (1985). Income and price effects in foreign trade. Handbook of International Economics, 2, 1041?1105. doi: 10.1016/S1573-4404(85)020 11-1.
  • Grauwe, P. De. (1988). Exchange rate variability and the slowdown in growth of international trade. Staff Papers - International Monetary Fund, 35(1), 63. doi: 10.23 07/3867277.
  • Gruss, B., & Kebhaj, S. (2019). Commodity terms of trade: A new database. IMF Working Papers, 2019(021). doi: 10.5089/9781484393857.001.
  • Hayakawa, K., & Kimura, F. (2009). The effect of exchange rate volatility on inter-national trade in East Asia. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 23(4), 395?406. doi: 10.1016/j.jjie.2009.07.001.
  • Hurley, D. T., & Papanikolaou, N. (2021). Autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) analysis of US-China commodity trade dynamics. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 81, 454?467. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2020.10.019.
  • Matsubayashi, Y., & Hamori, S. (2003). Some international evidence on the stabil-ity of aggregate import demand function. Applied Economics, 35(13), 1497?1504. doi: 10.1080/0003684032000095965.
  • McKenzie, M. D., & Brooks, R. D. (1997). The impact of exchange rate volatility on German-US trade flows. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 7(1), 73?87. doi: 10.1016/S1042-4431(97)00012-7.
  • Naimy, V., Chidiac, J. E., & Khoury, R. (2020). Volatility and Value at Risk of cryp-to versus fiat currencies. In W. Abramowicz (Ed.). Business information systems workshops. BIS 2020. Lecture notes in business information processing (pp. 145?157). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61146-0_12.
  • Naimy, V., & Hayek, M. (2018). Modelling and predicting the Bitcoin volatility using GARCH models. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, 8(3), 197?215.doi: 10.1504/IJMMNO.2018.088994.
  • Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979?1990. doi: 10.1080/0003684050 0278103.
  • Nelson, D. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new ap-proach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347?370. doi: 10.2307/2938260.
  • Nishimura, Y., & Hirayama, K. (2013). Does exchange rate volatility deter Japan-China trade? Evidence from pre- and post-exchange rate reform in China. Japan and the World Economy, 25?26, 90?101. doi: 10.1016/j.japwor.2013.03.002.
  • Nkoro, E., & Uko, A. K. (2016). Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) cointegra-tion technique: Application and interpretation. Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, 5(4), 63?91.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289?326. doi: 10.1002/jae.616.
  • Pino, G., Tas, D., & Sharma, S. C. (2016). An investigation of the effects of exchange rate volatility on exports in East Asia. Applied Economics, 48(26), 2397?2411. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2015.1122730.
  • Raza, S. A., Shahbaz, M., & Nguyen, D. K. (2015). Energy conservation policies, growth and trade performance: Evidence of feedback hypothesis in Pakistan. Energy Policy, 80, 1?10. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.011.
  • Safuan, S. (2017). Exchange rate volatility and export volume: The case of Indone-sia and its main trading partners. European Research Studies Journal, XX(3A), 3?13. doi: 10.35808/ersj/692.
  • Sercu, P., & Vanhulle, C. (1992). Exchange rate volatility, international trade, and the value of exporting firms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 16(1), 155?182. doi: 10.1016/0378-4266(92)90083-C.
  • Serenis, D., & Tsounis, N. (2013). Exchange rate volatility and foreign trade: The case for Cyprus and Croatia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 5, 677?685. doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(13)00079-8.
  • Sharma, C., & Pal, D. (2018). Exchange rate volatility and India?s cross-border trade: A pooled mean group and nonlinear cointegration approach. Economic Modelling, 74, 230?246. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2018.05.016.
  • Smallwood, A. D. (2019). Analyzing exchange rate uncertainty and bilateral export growth in China: A multivariate GARCH-based approach. Economic Modelling, 82, 332?344. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2019.01.014.
  • Srinivasan, P., & Kalaivani, M. (2013). Exchange rate volatility and export growth in India: An ARDL bounds testing approach. Decision Science Letters, 2(3), 191?202. doi: 10.5267/j.dsl.2013.04.002.
  • Sugiharti, L., Esquivias, M. A., & Setyorani, B. (2020). The impact of exchange rate volatility on Indonesia?s top exports to the five main export markets. Heliyon, 6(1), 1?14. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03141.
  • Thuy, V. N. T., & Thuy, D. T. T. (2019). The impact of exchange rate volatility on exports in Vietnam: A bounds testing approach. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(1), 6. doi: 10.3390/jrfm12010006.
  • Umaru, A., Sa?idu, B. M., & Musa, S. (2013). An empirical analysis of exchange rate volatility on export trade in a developing economy. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 4(1), 42?53.
  • Viaene, J. M., & de Vries, C. G. (1992). International trade and exchange rate vola-tility. European Economic Review, 36(6), 1311?1321. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(92)90035-U.
  • Wang, Y., Almeida, W., & de Oliveira, Y. R. (2017). The main causes of BREXIT and possible consequences for the future of the Europe Union. Economic Analysis of Law Review, 8(1), 97?113.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
19322756

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_24136_oc_2023_004
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.