Impact of corporate social responsibility on cost of debt in Scandinavian public companies

• Authors: Vilija Aleknevičienė , Sandra Stralkutė

Abstracts

EN

Research background: In recent decades, companies have paid increasing attention to corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its related performance. Scandinavian countries lead the world in CSR and sustainability. The good CSR performance of Scandinavian companies has motivated studies on this phenomenon, particularly on the connection between a company's CSR and its performance. One of the most important performance indicators and value drivers is the cost of debt. Purpose of the article: This study assessed the impact of CSR on the cost of debt in Scandinavian public companies. Methods: The research was divided into two stages. In the first stage, Scandinavian public companies were divided into two groups (with and without ESG (environmental, social, governance) disclosure scores) to reveal differences in the cost of debt. In the second stage, a fixed-effects regression model for balanced panel data sets was applied from 2011 to 2020 to assess the impact of ESG and its pillars on the cost of debt. Findings & value added: The results revealed that the cost of debt of companies in Scandinavian countries with ESG disclosure scores was significantly lower. The ESG disclosure scores of these companies have increased significantly over the past 10 years. We found a positive impact of CSR on the cost of debt in Scandinavian public companies. The increase in ESG disclosure and pillar scores reduced the cost of debt. These findings are valuable from a scientific perspective. Scandinavian public companies with ESG scores have higher financial risk, but lower cost of debt. These results support the importance of investors' behavior, information asymmetry, and signaling. The findings have several implications for shareholders, managers and creditors. They suggest that creditors consider ESG disclosures when determining a borrower's creditworthiness. Additionally, it is a message to regulators that the debt market values ESG disclosures.

Keywords

EN

corporate social responsibility; cost of debt; ESG disclosure score; ESG disclosure pillars

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Oeconomia Copernicana
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 585-608

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Vilija Aleknevičienė

• Vytautas Magnus University

• https://orcid.org/0000000265018792

author

Sandra Stralkutė

• Vytautas Magnus University

• https://orcid.org/0000000257371246

References

• Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG scores and cost of debt. Energy Economics, 112, 106186. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186.
• Bae, K. H., el Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility reduce the costs of high leverage? Evidence from the capital structure and product market Interactions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 100, 135–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.11.007.
• Bae, K. H., Kang, J. K., & Wang, J. (2011). Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Econom-ics, 100(1), 130–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.019.
• Chen, Z., Yin, M., & Zhou, M. (2022). Does environmental regulatory pressure affect corporate debt financing? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 184, 106405. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106405.
• Clarkson, P. M., Fang, X., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. (2013). The relevance of envi-ronmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(5), 410–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.06.0 08.
• Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsi-bility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orienta-tion and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 328–355. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006.
• Dobler, M., Lajili, K., & Zéghal, D. (2015). Corporate environmental sustainability disclosures and environmental risk: Alternative tests of socio-political theories. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 11(3), 301–332. doi: 10.1108/JA OC-10-2013-0081.
• Fandella, P., Sergi, B. S., & Sironi, E. (2023). Corporate social responsibility per-formance and the cost of capital in BRICS countries. The problem of selectivity using environmental, social and governance scores. Corporate Social Responsibil-ity and Environmental Management, 30, 1712–1722. doi: 10.1002/csr.2447.
• Fard, A., Javadi, S., & Kim, I. (2020). Environmental regulation and the cost of bank loans: International evidence. Journal of Financial Stability, 51, 100797. doi: 10.10 16/j.jfs.2020.100797.
• Gigante, G., & Manglaviti, D. (2022). The ESG effect on the cost of debt financing: A sharp RD analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102382. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102382.
• Gjølberg, M. (2009). Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2008.10.003.
• Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002.
• Harjoto, M. A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and degrees of operating and financial leverage. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 49(2), 487–513. doi: 10.1007/s11156-016-0598-5.
• He, F., Qin, S., Liu, Y., & Wu, J. G. (2022). CSR and idiosyncratic risk: Evidence from ESG information disclosure. Finance Research Letters, 49, 102936. doi: 10.1016/j.frl. 2022.102936.
• He, L., Wu, C., Yang, X., & Liu, J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility, green credit, and corporate performance: An empirical analysis based on the mining, power, and steel industries of China. Natural Hazards, 95(1–2), 73–89. doi: 10.1007/s 11069-018-3440-7.
• Hoepner, A., Oikonomou, I., Scholtens, B., & Schröder, M. (2016). The effects of corporate and country sustainability characteristics on the cost of debt: An in-ternational investigation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 43(1–2), 158–190. doi: 10.1111/jbfa.12183.
• Ho, K. C., Wang, Q., Sun, X., & Wang, L. F. S. (2021). How does corporate social responsibility affect firm leverage? Kybernetes, 51(10), 2902–2926. doi: 10.1108/K-10-2020-0708.
• Jung, J., Herbohn, K., & Clarkson, P. (2018). Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1151–1171. doi: 10.100 7/s10551-016-3207-6.
• Kordsachia, O. (2021). A risk management perspective on CSR and the marginal cost of debt: Empirical evidence from Europe. Review of Managerial Science, 15(6), 1611–1643. doi: 10.1007/s11846-020-00392-2.
• Larcker, D. F., & Rusticus, T. O. (2010). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of accounting and economics, 49(3), 186–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004.
• La Rosa, F., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., & Terzani, S. (2018). The impact of corporate social performance on the cost of debt and access to debt financing for listed European non-financial firms. European Management Journal, 36(4), 519–529. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2017.09.007.
• Lee, D. D., Faff, R. W., Langfield-Smith, K., Chan, H., Greene, W., Hensher, D., Subrahmanyam, A., Herbohn, K., & Tanewski, G. (2009). Revisiting the vexing question: Does superior corporate social performance lead to improved finan-cial performance? Australian Journal of Management, 34(1), 21–49. doi: 10.1177/031289 620903400103.
• Maaloul, A., Zéghal, D., ben Amar, W., & Mansour, S. (2021). The effect of envi-ronmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and disclosure on cost of debt: The mediating effect of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Re-view, 26(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1057/s41299-021-00130-8.
• Mbanyele, W., Huang, H., Li, Y., Muchenje, L. T., & Wang, F. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and green innovation: Evidence from mandatory CSR dis-closure laws. Economics Letters, 212, 110322. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110322.
• Menz, K. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: Is it rewarded by the corpo-rate bond market? A critical note. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 117–134. doi: 10.10 07/s10551-010-0452-y.
• Midttun, A., Gjølberg, M., Kourula, A., Sweet, S., & Vallentin, S. (2015). Public policies for corporate social responsibility in four Nordic countries: Harmony of goals and conflict of means. Business and Society, 54(4), 464–500. doi: 10.1177/0 007650312450848.
• Minh, T. N., Ngoc, A. M., Tuan, A. N., & Dao, T. N. (2022). Corporate social re-sponsibility, market rivalry and firm leverage: new evidence from a fixed-effect quantile regression approach. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102794. doi: 10.1016/ j.frl.2022.102794.
• Morrone, D., Schena, R., Conte, D., Bussoli, C., & Russo, A. (2022). Between say-ing and doing, in the end there is the cost of capital: Evidence from the energy sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 390–402. doi: 10.1002/bse.2900.
• Morsing, M., & Strand, R. (2014). CSR and beyond. A Nordic perspective. Corpo-rate Communications: An International Journal, 19(3), 318–322. doi: 10.1108/CCIJ-04-2014–0029.
• Naimy, V., Khoury, R., Montero, J. M., & Souk, J. (2023). Post-Brexit exchange rate volatility and its impact on UK exports to eurozone countries: A bounds test-ing approach. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 135–168. doi: 10.24136/oc.2023.004.
• Nikolaev, V., & Van Lent, L. (2005). The endogeneity bias in the relation between cost-of-debt capital and corporate disclosure policy. European Accounting Re-view, 14(4), 677–724. doi: 10.1080/09638180500204624.
• Prasad, K., Kumar, S., Devji, S., Lim, W. M., Prabhu, N., & Moodbidri, S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and cost of capital: The moderating role of poli-cy intervention. Research in International Business and Finance, 60, 101620. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101620.
• Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F., & Mariani, M. (2021). Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1412–1421. doi: 10.100 2/csr.2134.
• Santos‐Jaén, J. M., Madrid‐Guijarro, A., & García‐Pérez‐de‐Lema, D. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The mediating role of debt terms and human capital. Corpo-rate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1200–1215. doi: 10.1002 /csr.2125.
• Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592. doi: 10.1002/smj.678.
• Strand, R., Freeman, R. E., & Hockerts, K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in Scandinavia: An overview. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2224-6.
• Verwijmeren, P., & Derwall, J. (2010). Employee well-being, firm leverage, and bankruptcy risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(5), 956–964. doi: 10.1016/j.jb ankfin.2009.10.006.
• Xu, X., & Li, J. (2020). Asymmetric impacts of the policy and development of green credit on the debt financing cost and maturity of different types of enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121574. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020. 121574.
• Yeh, C. C., Lin, F., Wang, T. S., & Wu, C. M. (2020). Does corporate social respon-sibility affect cost of capital in China? Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.04.001.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/oc.2023.016

Biblioteka Nauki

19322772