Circular economy practices as a tool for sustainable development in the context of renewable energy: What are the opportunities for the EU?

• Authors: Ugnius Jakubelskas , Viktorija Skvarciany

Abstracts

EN

Research background: In order to tackle climate change and ensure Paris agreements are met, countries are forced to look for alternative ways of producing, consuming, and wasting and adopt a circular economy. Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions becomes one of the key elements. The demand for electricity is increasing, and most greenhouse gas emissions derive from the energy sector. Because of that, it is crucial to ensure the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy. Renewable energy, as a part of the circular economy, also contributes to sustainable development. Only the efficient implementation of circular economy and renewable energy practices can ensure that sustainable development goals are achieved. Purpose of the article: The study aims at determining the efficiency of European Union countries implementing circular economy practices through renewable energy to attain SDGs. The study focuses on the significance of renewable energy as a tool for the circular economy to achieve sustainable development and highlights the progress achieved in SDG through renewable energy in the EU. Methods: For efficiency assessment of the circular economy represented by the renewable energy indicators, data envelopment analysis (DEA) was performed. Findings & value added: This study presents a relation analysis of the circular economy and renewable energy and the importance of efficiency in achieving SDGs through a circular economy. The study helps to understand the circular economy represented by renewable energy and how it transforms into sustainable development and contributes to necessary actions needed for countries to improve. Based on the results, Sweden, Luxembourg, Ireland, Latvia, Estonia, Malta, the Netherlands and Bulgaria are considered the most efficient countries, while Austria is the least efficient. Unused solar and wind power potential can slow down sustainable development; however, EU programs and renewable energy strategies help countries move towards clean energy and ensure efficient implementation of sustainable development goals.

Keywords

EN

circular economy; sustainable development; renewable energy

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Oeconomia Copernicana
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 833-859

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Ugnius Jakubelskas

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

• https://orcid.org/0000000160684537

author

Viktorija Skvarciany

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

• https://orcid.org/0000000180224124

References

• Agovino, M., Matricano, D., & Garofalo, A. (2020). Waste management and competitiveness of firms in Europe: A stochastic frontier approach. Waste Management, 102, 528–540.
• Ahmed, S., Hasan, M. Z., Laokri, S., Jannat, Z., Ahmed, M. W., Dorin, F., Vargas, V., & Khan, J. A. M. (2019). Technical efficiency of public district hospitals in Bangladesh: A data envelopment analysis. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 17(1), 15.
• Alhawari, O., Awan, U., Bhutta, M. K. S., & Ülkü, M. A. (2021). Insights from circular economy literature: A review of extant definitions and unravelling paths to future research. Sustainability, 13(2), 859.
• Arauzo-Carod, J.-M., Kostakis, I., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2022). Policies for supporting the regional circular economy and sustainability. Annals of Regional Science, 68(2), 255–262.
• Aşkın, A., Kılkış, Ş., & Akınoğlu, B. G. (2023). Recycling photovoltaic modules within a circular economy approach and a snapshot for Türkiye. Renewable Energy, 208, 583–596.
• Bag, S., Sahu, A. K., Kilbourn, P., Pisa, N., Dhamija, P., & Sahu, A. K. (2022). Modeling barriers of digital manufacturing in a circular economy for enhancing sustainability. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(3), 833–869.
• Banjerdpaiboon, A., & Limleamthong, P. (2023). Assessment of national circular economy performance using super-efficiency dual data envelopment analysis and Malmquist productivity index: Case study of 27 European countries. Heliyon, 9(6), e16584.
• Bódis, K., Kougias, I., Jäger-Waldau, A., Taylor, N., & Szabó, S. (2019). A high-resolution geospatial assessment of the rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in the European Union. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 114, 109309.
• Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations.
• Castillo-Giménez, J., Montañés, A., & Picazo-Tadeo, A. J. (2019). Performance in the treatment of municipal waste: Are European Union member states so different? Science of The Total Environment, 687, 1305–1314.
• Chen, J., Su, F., Jain, V., Salman, A., Tabash, M. I., Haddad, A. M., Zabalawi, E., Abdalla, A. A., & Shabbir, M. S. (2022). Does renewable energy matter to achieve sustainable development goals? The impact of renewable energy strategies on sustainable economic growth. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 829252.
• de Oliveira, C. T., & Oliveira, G. G. A. (2023). What circular economy indicators really measure? An overview of circular economy principles and sustainable development goals. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 190, 106850.
• De Sousa, N. M., Oliveira, C. B., & Cunha, D. (2023). Photovoltaic electronic waste in Brazil: Circular economy challenges, potential and obstacles. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100456.
• Desing, H., Brunner, D., Takacs, F., Nahrath, S., Frankenberger, K., & Hischier, R. (2020). A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resource-based, systemic approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104673.
• Ember (2023). Electricity demand in the European Union (EU) in 2022, by country (in terawatt-hours). Ember.
• Enevoldsen, P., Permien, F.-H., Bakhtaoui, I., Krauland, A.-K. von, Jacobson, M. Z., Xydis, G., Sovacool, B. K., Valentine, S. V., Luecht, D., & Oxley, G. (2019). How much wind power potential does europe have? Examining european wind. power potential with an enhanced socio-technical atlas. Energy Policy, 132, 1092–1100.
• EurObserv’ER (2023a). Annual volume of electricity produced from solar photovoltaic in the European Union (EU-27) in 2022, by country (in gigawatt hours).
• EurObserv’ER (2023b). Electricity generation from wind power in the European Union (EU-27) in 2022, by country (in terawatt hours).
• European Commission (2009). Photovoltaic solar electricity potential in European countries.
• European Commision (2022). EU Solar Energy Strategy.
• Eurostat (2022a). Energy productivity.
• Eurostat (2022b). Share of energy from renewable sources.
• Eurostat (2023). Industrial production statistics.
• Galán-Martín, Á., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., Stamford, L., & Azapagic, A. (2016). Enhanced data envelopment analysis for sustainability assessment. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 38, 817–822.
• Garcia-Saravia Ortiz-de-Montellano, C., Samani, P., & van der Meer, Y. (2023). How can the circular economy support the advancement of the sustainable development goals (SDGs)? A comprehensive analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 40, 352–362.
• Gatto, A. (2023). Quantifying management efficiency of energy recovery from waste for the circular economy transition in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 136948.
• Gebhardt, M., Spieske, A., & Birkel, H. (2022). The future of the circular economy and its effect on supply chain dependencies: Empirical evidence from a Delphi study. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 157, 102570.
• Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768.
• Giannakitsidou, O., Giannikos, I., & Chondrou, A. (2020). Ranking European countries on the basis of their environmental and circular economy performance: A DEA application in MSW. Waste Management, 109, 181–191.
• Glavonjic, B., Lazarevic, A., & Kalem, M. (2019). Assessing the firewood consumption efficiency in Serbian households by applying the methods of econometric modeling: Case study-Gornji Milanovac. In R. Chobanova (Ed.). Digitalisation and circular economy: Forestry and forestry based industry implications. Proceedings of scientific papers: 12th Woodema annual international scientific conference (pp. 213–218). Varna: Union of Scientists of Bulgaria, WoodEMA – International Association for Economics and Management in Wood Processing and Furniture Manufacturing.
• Global Carbon Project. (2022). Per capita corbon dioxide emissions worldwide in 2021, by country (in metric tons).
• Güney, T. (2019). Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(5), 389–397.
• Holechek, J. L., Geli, H. M. E., Sawalhah, M. N., & Valdez, R. (2022). A global assessment: Can renewable energy replace fossil fuels by 2050? Sustainability, 14(8), 4792.
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C.
• Ji, L., Sun, Y., Liu, J., & Chiu, Y. (2023). Analysis of the circular economy efficiency of China’s industrial wastewater and solid waste - Based on a comparison before and after the 13th Five-Year Plan. Science of The Total Environment, 881, 163435.
• Karaeva, A., Magaril, E., Torretta, V., Viotti, P., & Rada, E. C. (2022). Public attitude towards nuclear and renewable energy as a factor of their development in a circular economy frame: Two case studies. Sustainability, 14(3), 1283.
• Khajuria, A., Atienza, V. A., Chavanich, S., Henning, W., Islam, I., Kral, U., Liu, M., Liu, X., Murthy, I. K., Oyedotun, T. D. T., Verma, P., Xu, G., Zeng, X., & Li, J. (2022). Accelerating circular economy solutions to achieve the 2030 agenda for sustainable development goals. Circular Economy, 1(1), 100001.
• Khan, K., Su, C. W., Rehman, A. U., & Ullah, R. (2022). Is technological innovation a driver of renewable energy? Technology in Society, 70, 102044.
• Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232.
• Kirikkaleli, D., & Sowah, J. K. (2023). The asymmetric and long run effect of energy productivity on quality of environment in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 383, 135285.
• Kılıç, U., & Kekezoğlu, B. (2022). A review of solar photovoltaic incentives and policy: Selected countries and Turkey. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(5), 101669.
• Knäble, D., de Quevedo Puente, E., Pérez-Cornejo, C., & Baumgärtler, T. (2022). The impact of the circular economy on sustainable development: A European panel data approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 34, 233–243.
• Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S. E. (2018). Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 544–552.
• Kotzebue, J. R., & Weissenbacher, M. (2020). The EU’s clean energy strategy for islands: A policy perspective on Malta’s spatial governance in energy transition. Energy Policy, 139, 111361.
• Kristensen, H. S., & Mosgaard, M. A. (2020). A review of micro level indicators for a circular economy – Moving away from the three dimensions of sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118531.
• Magazzino, C., Toma, P., Fusco, G., Valente, D., & Petrosillo, I. (2022). Renewable energy consumption, environmental degradation and economic growth: The greener the richer? Ecological Indicators, 139, 108912.
• Majeed, M., & Luni, T. (2020). Circular economy indicators and environmental quality: A global evidence of 131 countries with heterogeneous income groups. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science, 14, 866–912.
• Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018). How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 703–722.
• Mihai, F.-C., & Minea, I. (2021). Sustainable alternative routes versus linear economy and resources degradation in Eastern Romania. Sustainability, 13(19), 10574.
• Mohd Chachuli, F. S., Ahmad Ludin, N., Md Jedi, M. A., & Hamid, N. H. (2021). Transition of renewable energy policies in Malaysia: Benchmarking with data envelopment analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 150, 111456.
• Molinos-Senante, M., & Maziotis, A. (2021). The cost of reducing municipal unsorted solid waste: Evidence from municipalities in Chile. Sustainability, 13(12), 6607.
• Morseletto, P. (2020). Targets for a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104553.
• Murshed, M., Apergis, N., Alam, M. S., Khan, U., & Mahmud, S. (2022). The impacts of renewable energy, financial inclusivity, globalization, economic growth, and urbanization on carbon productivity: Evidence from net moderation and mediation effects of energy efficiency gains. Renewable Energy, 196, 824–838.
• Mushtaq, Z., Wei, W., Sharif, M., & Chandio, A. A. (2021). Evaluating energy consumption efficiency in tobacco production: Applying Data Envelopment Analysis. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 24(3), 23–39.
• Nhan, D. T. T., Pho, K.-H., Anh, D. T. Van, & Mcaleer, M. (2021). Evaluating the efficiency of Vietnam banks using Data Envelopment Analysis. Annals of Financial Economics, 16(2), 2150010.
• Okorie, O., Salonitis, K., Charnley, F., Moreno, M., Turner, C., & Tiwari, A. (2018). Digitisation and the circular economy: A review of current research and future trends. Energies, 11(11), 3009.
• Østergaard, P. A., Duic, N., Noorollahi, Y., & Kalogirou, S. (2022). Renewable energy for sustainable development. Renewable Energy, 199, 1145–1152.
• Palea, V., Santhià, C., & Miazza, A. (2023). Are circular economy strategies economically successful? Evidence from a longitudinal panel. Journal of Environmental Management, 337, 117726.
• Pata, U. K., Erdogan, S., & Ozcan, B. (2023). Evaluating the role of the share and intensity of renewable energy for sustainable development in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421, 138482.
• Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., & Ormazabal, M. (2018). Towards a consensus on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 605–615.
• Robaina, M., Murillo, K., Rocha, E., & Villar, J. (2020). Circular economy in plastic waste - Efficiency analysis of European countries. Science of The Total Environment, 730, 139038.
• Rodríguez‐Lozano, G., & Cifuentes‐Yate, M. (2021). Efficiency assessment of electricity generation from renewable and non‐renewable energy sources using Data Envelopment Analysis. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(13), 19597–19610.
• Ryberg, D. S., Caglayan, D. G., Schmitt, S., Linßen, J., Stolten, D., & Robinius, M. (2019). The future of European onshore wind energy potential: Detailed distribution and simulation of advanced turbine designs. Energy, 182, 1222–1238.
• Sachs, J. D., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Drumm, E. (2023). Implementing the SDG stimulus. Sustainable development report 2023. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
• Sariatli, F. (2017). Linear economy versus circular economy: A comparative and analyzer study for optimization of economy for sustainability. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 6(1), 31–34.
• Shao, X., & Fang, T. (2021). Performance analysis of government subsidies for photovoltaic industry: Based on spatial econometric model. Energy Strategy Reviews, 34, 100631.
• Škrinjarić, T. (2020). Empirical assessment of the circular economy of selected European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120246.
• Titko, J., Stankevičienė, J., & Lāce, N. (2014). Measuring bank efficiency: DEA approach. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(4), 739–757.
• Tsaples, G., & Papathanasiou, J. (2021). Data envelopment analysis and the concept of sustainability: A review and analysis of the literature. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 138, 110664.
• Učkar, D., & Petrović, D. (2021). Efficiency of banks in Croatia. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci: Časopis Za Ekonomsku Teoriju i Praksu/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 39(2), 349–379.
• Ünal, E., & Sinha, V. K. (2023). Sustainability trade‐offs in the circular economy: A maturity‐based framework. Business Strategy and the Environment. Advance online publicaiton.
• United Nations Environment Programme (2022). Emissions gap report 2022: The closing window - climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies.
• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2015). Paris agreement.
• United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.
• Vasylieva, T., Pavlyk, V., Bilan, Y., Mentel, G., & Rabe, M. (2021). Assessment of energy efficiency gaps: The case for Ukraine. Energies, 14(5), 1323.
• Wang, M., Hossain, M. R., Si Mohammed, K., Cifuentes-Faura, J., & Cai, X. (2023). Heterogenous effects of circular economy, green energy and globalization on CO2 emissions: Policy based analysis for sustainable development. Renewable Energy, 211, 789–801.
• Yang, J., & Chen, B. (2021). Energy efficiency evaluation of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) based on data envelopment analysis. Applied Energy, 289, 116680.
• Yildizbasi, A. (2021). Blockchain and renewable energy: Integration challenges in circular economy era. Renewable Energy, 176, 183–197.
• Yousefi, S., Hassanzadeh, A., Saen, R. F., & Mousavi Kashi, Z. (2021). Assessing sustainability of Islamic countries via data envelopment analysis (DEA). Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 24, 1129–1143.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/oc.2023.025

Biblioteka Nauki

19903811