Economic and institutional determinants of environmental health and sustainability: Spatial and nonlinear effects for a panel of worldwide countries

• Authors: Vasile Dinu , Cristian Mihai Dragoş , Codruţa Mare , Simona Laura Dragoş , Roxana Mare

Abstracts

EN

Research background: This study identifies the key factors influencing environmental health across a global panel of countries, focusing on protection from environmental hazards, as informed by the existing literature, while also shedding light on novel aspects of these causal relationships. Purpose of the article: This study aims to reveal, through a comprehensive review of the relevant literature, the underexplored phenomena of spatial diffusion and contagion of national environmental behaviors and the nonlinear dynamics between environmental performance and its determinants, acknowledging the significant diversity in the characteristics and behaviors of the countries studied. Methods: Spatial analysis and econometric methods, including spatial panel regression alongside dynamic panel models using threshold techniques, were employed to meet the study’s objectives. Findings & value added: This study’s major finding is that environmental performance across nations shows significant clustering influenced by economic and institutional factors. This clustering effect arises from spatial contagion and diffusion processes, as evidenced by spatial panel regression analysis. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that variations in environmental behavior can be attributed to differing levels of development and specific internal conditions within countries. Notably, a country’s gross domestic product and the proportion of industries in its economy have a substantial effect on its environmental health practices, establishing distinct impact thresholds. This research enriches academic dialogue by illustrating, through these thresholds, that in less developed countries, an increased industrial share leads to environmental degradation. Moreover, the influence of the other examined factors varied depending on the category of the country under review, highlighting the nuanced effects of economic and institutional variables on environmental outcomes.

Keywords

EN

contagion and diffusion; spatial panel; threshold panel; environmental health; environmental performance; environmental sustainability

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Oeconomia Copernicana
• Year: 2024
• Volume: 15
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 195-227

Dates

published

2024

Contributors

author

Vasile Dinu

• Bucharest University of Economic Studies

• https://orcid.org/0000000336062548

author

Cristian Mihai Dragoş

• Babeş-Bolyai University

• https://orcid.org/0000000315520490

author

Codruţa Mare

• Babeş-Bolyai University

• https://orcid.org/0000000249207462

author

Simona Laura Dragoş

• Babeş-Bolyai University

• https://orcid.org/0000000230373401

author

Roxana Mare

• Technical University of Cluj-Napoca

• https://orcid.org/0000000155321192

References

• Abbasi, K. R., Kirikkaleli, D., & Altuntaş, M. (2022). Carbon dioxide intensity of GDP and environmental degradation in an emerging country. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(56), 84451–84459.
• Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Majeed, A., & Huang, B. (2021). An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: Does institutional quality make a difference?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106603.
• Alshehhi, J. M., & Zervopoulos P. D. (2023). The effect of institutional factors on environmental efficiency: A cross-country analysis using a Bayesian data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 395, 136401.
• Alvarado, R., Ponce, P., Criollo, A., Córdova, K., & Khan, M. K. (2018). Environmental degradation and real per capita output: New evidence at the global level grouping countries by income levels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 13–20.
• Arshad, Z., Robaina, M., & Botelho, A. (2020). The role of ICT in energy consumption and environment: An empirical investigation of Asian economies with cluster analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 32913–32932.
• Bali Swain, R., & Yang-Wallentin, F. (2020). Achieving sustainable development goals: Predicaments and strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27(2), 96–106.
• Bartolome, A. M., Carpio, D. A., & Urbano, B. (2022). Urban agriculture digital planning for the European Union’s Green Deal. Amfiteatru Economic, 24(59), 159–172.
• Bello, M. O., & Ch'ng, K. S. (2022). Convergence in energy intensity of GDP: Evidence from West African countries. Energy, 254, 124217.
• Brodny, J., & Tutak, M. (2023). The level of implementing sustainable development goal" Industry, innovation and infrastructure" of Agenda 2030 in the European Union countries: Application of MCDM methods. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 47–102.
• Cheng, C. Y., Chien, M. S., & Lee, C. C. (2021b). ICT diffusion, financial development, and economic growth: An international cross-country analysis. Economic modelling, 94, 662–671.
• Cheng, Y., Awan, U., Ahmad, S., & Tan, Z. (2021a). How do technological innovation and fiscal decentralization affect the environment? A story of the fourth industrial revolution and sustainable growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120398.
• Chersan, I. C., Păunescu, M., Nichita, E. M., Dumitru, V. F., & Manea, C. L. (2023). Circular economy practices in the electrical and electronic equipment sector in the European Union. Amfiteatru Economic, 25(62), 80–100.
• Ciocan, D. M., & Milon, A. (2017). Study regarding the motives of children participation in sport activities. LUMEN Proceedings, 1, 159–168.
• Clark, M., Andrews, J., & Hillis, V. (2022). A quantitative application of diffusion of innovations for modeling the spread of conservation behaviors. Ecological Modelling, 473, 110145.
• de Mello Santos, V. H., Campos, T. L. R., Espuny, M., & de Oliveira, O. J. (2022). Towards a green industry through cleaner production development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(1), 349–370.
• Dedeurwaerdere, T., Admiraal, J., Beringer, A., Bonaiuto, F., Cicero, L., Fernandez-Wulff, P., & Vivero, J. L. (2016). Combining internal and external motivations in multi-actor governance arrangements for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy, 58, 1–10.
• Dogan, E., & Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2020). The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: Evidence from European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 12717–12724.
• Downie, C. (2022). Competition, cooperation, and adaptation: The organizational ecology of international organizations in global energy governance. Review of International Studies, 48(2), 364–384.
• Germani, A. R., Ker, A. P., & Castaldo, A. (2020). On the existence and shape of an environmental crime Kuznets Curve: A case study of Italian provinces. Ecological Indicators, 108, 105685.
• Grybaitė, V., Stankevičienė, J., Lapinskienė, G., & Podvezko, A. (2022). Comparison of the environment of EU countries for sharing economy state by modern multiple criteria methods. Amfiteatru Economic, 24(59), 194–213.
• Haibo, C., Ke, D., Fangfang, W., & Ayamba, E. C. (2020). The spatial effect of tourism economic development on regional ecological efficiency. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 38241–38258.
• Halleck-Vega, S., Mandel, A., & Millock, K. (2018). Accelerating diffusion of climate-friendly technologies: A network perspective. Ecological Economics, 152, 235–245.
• Hosta, M., & Zabkar, V. (2021). Antecedents of environmentally and socially responsible sustainable consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2), 273–293.
• Howes, M., Wortley, L., Potts, R., Dedekorkut-Howes, A., Serrao-Neumann, S., Davidson, J., & Nunn, P. (2017). Environmental sustainability: A case of policy implementation failure? Sustainability, 9(2), 165,
• Hussain, Z., Mehmood, B., Khan, M. K., & Tsimisaraka, R. S. M. (2022). Green growth, green technology, and environmental health: Evidence from high-GDP countries. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 816697.
• Knill, C., & Liefferink, D. (2021). The establishment of EU environmental policy. In A. Jordan & V. Gravey (Eds.). Environmental policy in the EU (pp. 13–32). Routledge.
• Kopnina, H. (2020). Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals. Journal of Environmental Education, 51(4), 280–291.
• Kusano, K., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2018). Ecology of freedom: Competitive tests of the role of pathogens, climate, and natural disasters in the development of socio-political freedom. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 954.
• Lazăr, D., Minea, A., & Purcel, A. A. (2019). Pollution and economic growth: Evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. Energy Economics, 81, 1121–1131.
• Le, H. P., & Ozturk, I. (2020). The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO 2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 22680–22697.
• Lenzen, M., Malik, A., Li, M., Fry, J., Weisz, H., Pichler, P. P., Moreira Chaves, L. S., Capon, A., & Pencheon, D. (2020). The environmental footprint of health care: A global assessment. Lancet Planetary Health, 4(7), e271–e279.
• Liu, H., Alharthi, M., Atil, A., Zafar, M. W., & Khan, I. (2022). A non-linear analysis of the impacts of natural resources and education on environmental quality: Green energy and its role in the future. Resources Policy, 79, 102940.
• Liu, Q., Wang, S., Zhang, W., & Li, J. (2018). Income distribution and environmental quality in China: A spatial econometric perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 14–26.
• Liu, X., & Wang, W. (2024). The impact of major pollution incidents on environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139975.
• Lubowiecki-Vikuk, A., Dąbrowska, A., & Machnik, A. (2021). Responsible consumer and lifestyle: Sustainability insights. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 91–101.
• Manolis, E. N., & Manoli, E. N. (2021). Raising awareness of the sustainable development goals through ecological projects in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123614.
• Mare, C., Dragos S. L., Dragota I. M., Muresan G. M., & Urean C.A. (2016). Spatial convergence processes on the European Union’s life insurance market. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50(4), 93–107.
• Matsumoto, K. I., Makridou, G., & Doumpos, M. (2020). Evaluating environmental performance using data envelopment analysis: The case of European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122637.
• McCullough, B. P., Orr, M., & Kellison, T. (2020). Sport ecology: Conceptualizing an emerging subdiscipline within sport management. Journal of Sport Management, 34(6), 509–520.
• McGregor, D., Whitaker, S., & Sritharan, M. (2020). Indigenous environmental justice and sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 43, 35–40.
• Mello Rose, F., Thiel, J., & Grabher, G. (2022). Selective inclusion: Civil society involvement in the smart city ecology of Amsterdam. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29(3), 369–382.
• Mikulčić, H., Klemeš, J. J., Vujanović, M., Urbaniec, K., & Duić, N. (2016). Reducing greenhouse gasses emissions by fostering the deployment of alternative raw materials and energy sources in the cleaner cement manufacturing process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 119–132.
• Mistur, E. M., Givens, J. W., & Matisoff, D. C. (2023). Contagious COVID‐19 policies: Policy diffusion during times of crisis. Review of Policy Research, 40(1), 36–62.
• Muhammad, S., & Long, X. (2021). Rule of law and CO2 emissions: A comparative analysis across 65 belt and road initiative (BRI) countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123539.
• Nemeckova, T., & Hayat, A. (2022). Does trade openness improve the quality of domestic institutions? Evidence from Africa. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17 (4), 881–908.
• Rahman, M. M., & Alam, K. (2022). Life expectancy in the ANZUS-BENELUX countries: The role of renewable energy, environmental pollution, economic growth and good governance. Renewable Energy, 190, 251–260.
• Sharma, A. K., Sharma, M., Sharma, A. K., Sharma, M., Sharma, M. (2023). Mapping the impact of environmental pollutants on human health and environment: A sustematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 225, 107325.
• Shi, X. (2022). Environmental health perspectives for low- and middle- income countries. Global Health Journal, 6.
• Srivastav, A. L., Dhyani, R., Ranjan, M., Madhav, S., & Sillanpää, M. (2021). Climate-resilient strategies for sustainable management of water resources and agriculture. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(31), 41576–41595.
• Sun, G. Q., Zhang, H. T., Wang, J. S., Li, J., Wang, Y., Li, L., & Jin, Z. (2021). Mathematical modeling and mechanisms of pattern formation in ecological systems: A review. Nonlinear Dynamics, 104, 1677–1696.
• Taghvaee, V. M., Nodehi, M., Saber, R. M., & Mohebi, M. (2022). Sustainable development goals and transportation modes: Analyzing sustainability pillars of environment, health, and economy. World Development Sustainability, 1, 100018.
• Tan, Q., Yasmeen, H., Ali, S., Ismail, H., & Zameer, H. (2023). Fintech development, renewable energy consumption, government effectiveness and management of natural resources along the belt and road countries. Resources Policy, 80, 103251.
• Tatar, M., Harati, J., Farokhi, S., Taghvaee, V., & Wilson, F. A. (2024). Good governance and natural resource management in oil and gas resource-rich countries: A machine learning approach. Resources Policy, 89, 104583.
• Varela-Candamio, L., Novo-Corti, I., & García-Álvarez, M. T. (2018). The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1565–1578.
• Velte, P. (2023). Determinants and financial consequences of environmental performance and reporting: A literature review of European archival research, Journal of Environmental Management, 340.
• Wallis, H., & Loy, L. S. (2021). What drives pro-environmental activism of young people? A survey study on the Fridays For Future movement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101581.
• Wang, K. H., Liu, L., Adebayo, T. S., Lobonț, O. R., & Claudia, M. N. (2021). Fiscal decentralization, political stability and resources curse hypothesis: A case of fiscal decentralized economies. Resources Policy, 72, 102071.
• Wang, Q., Yang, T., & Li, R. (2023). Does income inequality reshape the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis? A nonlinear panel data analysis. Environmental Research, 216, 114575.
• Wang, S., Zhao, D., & Chen, H. (2020). Government corruption, resource misallocation, and ecological efficiency. Energy Economics, 85, 104573.
• World Bank - WGI (2023). World governance indicators. World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indic ators (11.12.2023).
• World Bank (2023). Indicators: Economy & growth, education, environment. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator (11.12.2023).
• Yale University (2023). Environmental performance index. Retrieved from https://epi.yale.edu/epi-results/2022/component/hlt (11.12.2023).
• Yan, J., & Haroon, M. (2023). Financing efficiency in natural resource markets mobilizing private and public capital for a green recovery. Resources Policy, 85, 103841.
• Yew, M.H., Molla, A.,& Cooper, V. (2022). Behavioral and environmental sustainability determinants of residential energy management information systems use, Journal of Cleaner Production, 356, 131778.
• Yi, Q. (2023). Diffusion of environmental technology innovation through the lens of banking sector performance and human resource management: An influential step towards environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(46), 102428–102437.
• Yilmaz, R., & Koyuncu, C. (2023). The impact of globalization on the rate of e-waste recycling: Evidence from European countries. Amfiteatru Economic, 25(62), 180–195.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/oc.2915

Biblioteka Nauki

39833161