Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 17 | 2(58) | 151-155

Article title

The Primacy Position of the Comparison Question

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
A simple question for many, idle for others, but necessary to answer for everyone, is why the comparison question occupies a first position based on the relevant question when it comes to format sequences corresponding to deception polygraph techniques. This questioning is transcendent when it occurs in the context of the scientific, legal debate, or due to the scrutiny of polygraph consumers who make administrative decisions based on the diagnostic results. However, within the polygraphy union it seems that the answer has been dealt with in informal settings, in hallway talks or as a classroom topic, but the truth is that its documentary formality seems to be scarce, for this reason, this discussion has the intention of providing basic knowledge to field examiners about this procedural unknown, of which, we are convinced that they are the ones who must be prepared to answer this and other procedural questions in order to maintain the scientific reputation of our profession.

Year

Volume

17

Issue

Pages

151-155

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

author

References

  • Horvath F.S. (2019), Chicago: Birthplace of Modern Polygraphy, European Polygraph, 13,2 (48), 70–71.
  • Krapohl D., Handler M. & Sturm S. (2012), Terminology Reference for the Science of Psychophysiological Detection of Deception, APA, p. 38.
  • Matte J.E. (1996), Forensic Psychophysiology using the Polygraph, J.A.M. Publications, Williamsville, NY. p. 41.
  • Summers W.G. (1939), Science can get the confession, Fordham Law Review, 8, 335–354.
  • Turrou L.G. (1938), Nazi Spies in America, Random House, New York.
  • Winter J.E. (1936), A comparison of the cardio-pneumo-psychograph and association methods in the detection of lying in cases of theft among college students, Journal of Applied Psychology, 20, 243–248.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
26850615

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_2478_EP-2023-0007
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.