How to create an engagement-friendly environment in reward-based crowdfunding?

• Authors: Marcin Bielicki , Rafał Rydzewski

Abstracts

EN

Crowdfunding appears to be an innovative way of fundraising various projects. Although it is a relatively new and unique way of financing, competition for potential backers increases every year. While recent works have explored the role of engagement and involvement in crowdfunding, there is still a lack of understanding of how creators can stimulate backers’ activity. Therefore the aim of this paper is to identify and classify the methods used for crowdfunding by the top creators to boost and maintain backer engagement. Drawing from the Theoretical Model of Customer Engagement and Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction, we propose a theoretical model that is backer engagement-based. It presents the unique role of involvement and participation in engagement and its interrelationship with value and community involvement. We investigate the top 30 most funded campaigns on Kickstarter in the tabletop games category. Based on our cross-case study, we identify and categorise tactics that create engagement-friendly environments. Our findings suggest that over time creators tend to focus on shorter but more dynamic campaigns with the higher engagement of backers. The creators of the best campaigns use similar tactics that affect both engagement and involvement. The important but often ignored factor that influences engagement is social interaction.

Keywords

EN

crowdfunding; entrepreneurship; involvement; crowdsourcing; engagement

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
• Journal: Central European Economic Journal
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 56
• Pages: 38-55

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Marcin Bielicki

• Poznań University of Economics and Business, Department of Investments and Financial Markets Institute of Finance, Poznań, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000000167737232

author

Rafał Rydzewski

• University of Economics in Katowice, Faculty of Management Department of Enterprise Management Katowice, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000000305621167

References

• Ahlers, G. K. C., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
• Anglin, A. H., Allison, T. H., McKenny, A. F., & Busenitz, L. W. (2014). The role of charismatic rhetoric in crowdfunding: An examination with computer-Aided text analysis. In A. T. H. (Ed.), Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (Vol. 9, pp. 19–48). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-838720140000009010
• Anglin, A. H., Wolfe, M. T., Short, J. C., McKenny, A. F., & Pidduck, R. J. (2018). Narcissistic rhetoric and crowdfunding performance: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 780–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.004
• Bao, Z., Yang, Y., & Chau, M. (2019). The Dynamics of Funding Behaviors in Reward-Based Crowdfunding Projects. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB 2019), 541–545.
• Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2010). Crowdfunding: An Industrial Organization Perspective. 1–30.
• Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003
• Block, J., Hornuf, L., & Moritz, A. (2018). Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation? Small Business Economics, 50(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9876-4
• Boermans, S. M., Kamphuis, W., Delahaij, R., Van Den Berg, C., & Euwema, M. C. (2014). Team spirit makes the difference: The interactive effects of team work engagement and organizational constraints during a military operation on psychological outcomes afterwards. Stress and Health, 30(5), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2621
• Brabham, D. C. (2010). Moving the crowd at threadless. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1,122–1,145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003624090
• Butticè, V., Colombo, M. G., & Wright, M. (2017). Serial Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and Project Success. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(2), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12271
• Chakraborty, S., & Swinney, R. (2018). Designing Rewards-Based Crowdfunding Campaigns for Strategic Contributors. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3240094
• Chakraborty, S., & Swinney, R. (2021). Signaling to the crowd: Private quality information and rewards-based crowdfunding. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 23(1), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1287/MSOM.2019.0833
• Chaney, D. (2019). A principal–agent perspective on consumer co-production: Crowdfunding and the redefinition of consumer power. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.013
• Cornelius, P. B., & Gokpinar, B. (2020). The role of customer investor involvement in crowdfunding success. Management Science, 66(1), 452–472. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3211
• Cryder, C. E., Loewenstein, G., & Seltman, H. (2013). Goal gradient in helping behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1078–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.07.003
• Cumming, D., & Hornuf, L. (2018). The economics of crowdfunding: Startups, portals and investor behavior. In The Economics of Crowdfunding: Startups, Portals and Investor Behavior, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66119-3
• Deci, E. L. (2016). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination. In The Curated Reference Collection in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology (pp. 437–448). Elsevier Science Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.05613-3
• Dickey, M. D. (2005). Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(2), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504866
• Hagger, M. S., Koch, S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2015). The effect of causality orientations and positive competence-enhancing feedback on intrinsic motivation: A test of additive and interactive effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.012
• Hardin III, W. G., Leo Nagel, G., & Roskelley, K. (2017). Institutional monitoring, motivated investors, and firm performance Intrinsic value theory View project. In Article in Journal of Real Estate Research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326404278
• Kim, M. J., & Hall, C. M. (2020). What drives visitor economy crowdfunding? The effect of digital storytelling on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Tourism Management Perspectives, 34(June 2019), 100,638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100638
• Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2015). A Review of Crowdfunding Research and Findings. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2685739
• Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2017). Does my contribution to your crowdfunding project matter? Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.004
• Lam, S. Fong, Cheng, R. W. Yi, & Choy, H. C. (2010). School support and teacher motivation to implement project-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.07.003
• Lin, W. S., Chen, H. R., & Yang, M. L. (2020). How do we learn to get success together through crowdfunding platform? From the perspectives of system learning and multi-motivations. Telematics and Informatics, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101428
• Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(81)80017-1
• Manning, S., & Bejarano, T. A. (2016). Convincing the crowd: Entrepreneurial storytelling in crowdfunding campaigns. Strategic Organization, 15(2), 194–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016648500
• Marom, D., & Sade, O. (2013). Are the Life and Death of a Young Start-Up Indeed in the Power of the Tongue? Lessons from Online Crowdfunding Pitches. SSRN Electronic Journal, February, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2255707
• Mollick, E. (2018). Crowdfunding as a font of entrepreneurship: Outcomes of reward-based crowdfunding. In D. Cumming & L. Hornuf (Eds.). The Economics of Crowdfunding: Startups, Portals and Investor Behavior (pp. 133–150). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66119-3_7
• Morschheuser, B., Hamari, J., & Maedche, A. (2019). Cooperation or competition – When do people contribute more? A field experiment on gamification of crowdsourcing. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 127(August 2017), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.10.001
• Parhankangas, A., & Renko, M. (2017). Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.11.001
• Parihar, P., Dawra, J., & Sahay, V. (2019). The role of customer engagement in the involvement-loyalty link. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 37(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2017-0318
• Richins, M. L., & Bloch, P. H. (1986). After the New Wears off: The Temporal Context of Product Involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 280–285. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2489233
• Rodriguez-Ricardo, Y., Sicilia, M., & López, M. (2018). What drives crowdfunding participation? The influence of personal and social traits. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 22(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-03-2018-004
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(April), 101,860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
• Schmid, P. C. (2020). Power reduces the goal gradient effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104003
• Sharma, A., & Bhatnagar, J. (2017). Emergence of team engagement under time pressure: role of team leader and team climate. Team Performance Management, 23(3–4), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-06-2016-0031
• Skirnevskiy, V., Bendig, D., & Brettel, M. (2017). The influence of internal social capital on serial creators’ success in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(2), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12272
• Vismara, S. (2015). Information cascades among investors in equity crowdfunding. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2589619
• Vismara, S. (2016). Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9710-4
• Vismara, S. (2019). Sustainability in equity crowdfunding. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141(September 2017), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.014
• Vivek, S., Beatty, S., & Morgan, R. (2012). Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679200201
• Walthoff-Borm, X., Schwienbacher, A., & Vanacker, T. (2018). Equity crowdfunding: First resort or last resort? Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.001
• Wuillaume, A., Jacquemin, A., & Janssen, F. (2019). The right word for the right crowd: An attempt to recognize the influence of emotions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2017-0412
• Xi, N., & Hamari, J. (2019). Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction. International Journal of Information Management, 46(January), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.002
• Xu, T. (2015). Learning from the crowd: The feedback value of crowdfunding. In SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2637699
• Yang, J., Li, Y., Calic, G., & Shevchenko, A. (2020). How multimedia shape crowdfunding outcomes: The overshadowing effect of images and videos on text in campaign information. Journal of Business Research, 117, 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.008
• Zhang, H., & Chen, W. (2019). Crowdfunding technological innovations: Interaction between consumer benefits and rewards. Technovation, 84–85, 11–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.001

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/ceej-2022-0003

Biblioteka Nauki

2076909