Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 37 | 2 | 7-15

Article title

City Resilience Vs. Resilient City: Terminological Intricacies and Concept Inaccuracies

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

PL
The concept of resilience has in recent years been one of the more commonly used urban development concepts. In the social sciences, the term is understood as a dynamic process that reflects a relatively good adaptation, irrespective of the hazards or traumatic experiences. It is linked with the concepts of risk, vulnerability and positive adaptation. The concept of resilience as used in the social sciences has been adapted by other disciplines, including research on the city, where the term is ambiguously and sometimes inconsistently defined. The aim of this study is to explain the term resilience, its reference to the city and to clear up ambiguities of the terminology related to the two lines of research on resilience in relation to the city as presented by the relevant literature: city resilience and the resilient city. Analyses show that both these terms, despite their widespread application, are at present imprecisely defined in the relevant literature and generally speaking used interchangeably, which makes their precise application difficult. In addition, the assumption that city resilience can be treated as a process that leads to a desired state of the resilient city, has not been confirmed. The correctness of the application of the second of these concepts (the resilient city) raises doubts, because it will probably never be possible to develop a city not vulnerable or fully resistant to various types of development perturbations.

Year

Volume

37

Issue

2

Pages

7-15

Physical description

Dates

published
2018-06-15

Contributors

  • Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland
  • Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland

References

  • Adger W.N., 2000. Social and ecological resilience. Are they related? Progress in Human Geography 24(3): 347–364.
  • Ahern J., 2011. From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape Urban Planning 100(4): 341–343.
  • Barnett J., 2001. Adapting to climate change in Pacific Island communities. World Development 29: 977–993.
  • Beatley T., Newman P., 2013. Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability 5:3328–3345.
  • Betsill M.M., Bulkeley H., 2007. Looking back and thinking ahead: A decade of cities and climate change research. Local Environmental 12: 447–456.
  • Bogunovich D., 2009. From planning sustainable cities to designing resilient urban regions. Sustainable Development and Planning 1: 87–96.
  • Borucka A., Ostaszewski K., 2008. Koncepcja resilience. Kluczowe pojęcia i wybrane zagadnienia (The concept of resilience. Key terms and selected issues). Medycyna Wieku Rozwojowego (2 Pt 1): 587–597.
  • Bulkeley H., 2010. Cities and the governing of climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35: 229–253.
  • Bulkeley H., Newel P., 2010. Governing climate change. Routledge, London.
  • Chelleri L., 2012. From the «resilient city» to urban resilience. A review essay on understanding and integrating the resilience perspective for urban systems. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica 58(2): 287–306.
  • Coaffee J., 2009. Terrorism, risk and the global city: Towards urban resilience. Ashgate Publishing.
  • Colten C., Kates R., Laska S., 2008. Three years after Katrina – Lessons for community resilience. Environment 50(5): 36–47.
  • Craig A.O., Bond L., Burns J.M., Vella-Brodrick D.A., Sawyer S.M., 2003. Adolescent resilience: A concept analysis. Journal of Adolescence 26: 1–11.
  • Cumming G.S., 2011. Spatial resilience: Integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landscape Ecology 26(7): 899–909.
  • Curtis W.J., Cicchetti D., 2004. Rozwijanie badań nad rezyliencją w XXI wieku: rozważania teoretyczne i metodologiczne w ocenie biologicznych składników rezyliencji (Moving research on resilience into the 21st century: Theoretical and methodological considerations in examining the biological contributors to resilience). Audiofonologia. Problemy teorii i praktyki 25: 65–91.
  • Cutter S.L., Boruff B.J., Shirley W.L., 2003. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly 84(2): 242–261.
  • Desouza K.C., Flanery T.H., 2013. Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual framework. Cities 35: 89–99.
  • Drobniak A. (ed.), 2014. Urban resilience concept and post-industrial cities in Europe. Uniwersty of Economics in Katowice – Helion, Katowice.
  • Drobniak A., 2017. Theoretical and empirical aspects of urban resilience − between papers and findings for Polish and Czech cities. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach 314: 111–135.
  • Drobniak A., Plac K., 2015. Urban resilience – transformacja miast poprzemysłowych aglomeracji górnośląskiej (Urban reslience – transformation of formerly industrial cities in the agglomeration of Upper Silesia). Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach 250: 75–98.
  • Ernstson H., van der Leeuw S.E., Redman C.L., Meffert D.J., Davis G., Alfsen C. Elmqvist T., 2010. Urban transitions: On urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 39: 531–545.
  • Fergus S., Zimmerman M.A., 2005. Adolescent resilience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annual Review of Public Health 26: 399–419.
  • Foster K.A., 2007. A case study approach to understanding regional resilience. Working Paper 2007–08. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley: 2–41.
  • Galderisi A., 2014. Urban resilience: A framework for empowering cities in face of heterogeneous risk factors. ITU A|Z 11(1): 36–58.
  • Gánti T. 1986. Podstawy życia (The Principles of Life). Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa.
  • Garmezy N., Masten A.S., Tellegen A., 1984. The study of stress and competence in children: A building block for developmental psychopathology. Child Development 55: 97–111.
  • Godschalk D.R., 2003. Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Nat. Hazards Rev.4: 136–143.
  • Greenberg M.T., 2006. Promoting resilience in children and youth. Preventive intervention and their interface with neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1094: 139–150.
  • Gunder M., Hillier J., 2009. Planning in ten words or less: A Lacanian entanglement with spatial planning. Ashgate.
  • Haken H. 1993. Synergetic as a theory of creativity and its planning. In: Andersson A.E., Batten D.F., Kobayashi K., Yoshikawa K. (ed.), The cosmo-creative society: Logistical networks in dynamic economy. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • Hamilton W.A.H., 2009. Resilience and the city: The water sector. Proc. ICE – Urban Des. Plan. 162(3): 109–121.
  • Harrigan J., Martin P., 2002. Terrorism and the resilience of cities. Economic Policy Review – Federal Reserve Bank of New York 8(2): 97–116.
  • Healey P., 2007. Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge, New York.
  • Healey P., Upton R. (eds), 2010. Crossing borders international exchange and planning practices. Routledge, Oxon.
  • Hill E., Clair T., Wial H., 2010. Economic shocks and regional economic resilience. George Washington, Urban Institute. Building Resilience Region Project. Conference on Urban and Regional Policy and Its Effects: Building Resilience Regions, Washington DC, May 20–21: 1–69.
  • Jabareen Y., 2013. Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities 31: 220–229.
  • Jacobs J., 1961. The death and life of great American cities. Random House and Vintage Books, New York.
  • Klein B., Koenig R., Schmitt G., 2017. Managing urban resilience. Stream processing platform for responsive cities. Informatik Spektrum 40(1): 35–45.
  • Kumpfer K.L., Summerhays J.F., 2006, Prevention approaches to enhance resilience among high-risk youth. Comments on the papers of Dishion & Connell and Greenberg. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1094: 151–163.
  • Lamond J.E., Proverbs D.G., 2009. Resilience to flooding: Lessons from international comparison. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plan. 162(2): 63–70.
  • Leichenko R., 2011. Climate change and urban resilience. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3(3): 164–168.
  • Lipka A., 2016. Rezyliencja organizacji w warunkach cyberdyskredytacji – definicja i determinant (Resilience of organisations under cyber-discreditation – definition and determinant). Zarządzanie i Finanse, Journal of Management and Finance 14 No. 2(2): 193–204.
  • Luthar S.S., 2006. Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In: Cicchetti D., Cohen D.J. (ed.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation. 2(3). Wiley, New York: 740–795.
  • Luthar S.S., Cicchetti D., Becker B., 2000. The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development 71(3): 543–562.
  • Luthar S.S., Zelazo L.B., 2003. Research on resilience. An integrative review. In: Luthar S.S. (ed.), Resilience and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 510–549.
  • Martin R., Sunley P., Gardiner B., Tyler P., 2016. How regions react to recession: Resilience and the role of economic structure. Regional Studies 50(4): 561–585.
  • Masten A.S., Powell J.L.A., 2003. Resilience framework for research policy and practice. In: Luthar S.S. (ed.), Resilience and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1–28.
  • Meerow S., Newell J.P., Stults M., 2016. Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning 147: 38–49.
  • Mehmood A., 2016. Of resilient places: Planning for urban resilience. European Planning Studies 24(2): 407–419.
  • Melkunaite L., Guay F., 2016. Resilient city: Opportunities for cooperation. IAIA16 Conference Proceedings, Resilience and Sustainability 36th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment 11–14 May 2016, Nagoya Congress Cente, Aichi-Nagoya, Japan, www.iaia.org
  • Okereke C., Bulkeley H., Schroeder H., 2009. Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the international regime. Global Environmental Politics 9: 58–78.
  • Parysek J.J., Mierzejewska L., 2013. Życie miasta: studium Poznania. Miasto i jego mieszkańcy (The life of the city: A case study of Poznań. The city and its residents). Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.
  • Pelling M., 2003. The vulnerability of cities: Natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan, London.
  • Pendall R., Foster K., Cowel M., 2010. Resilience and regions: Building understanding of the metaphor. Cambridge Journal of Economic and Society 3(1): 71–84.
  • Pickett S.T.A, Cadenasso M.L., Grove J.M., 2004. Resilient cities: Meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning 69: 369–384.
  • Pike A., Dawley S., Tomaney J., 2010. Resilience adaptation and adaptability. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3: 59–70.
  • Rose A., 2004. Defining and measuring economic resilience to disaster. Disaster Prevention and Management 13(4): 307–314.
  • Sameroff A., Rosenblum K., 2006. Psychosocial constraints on the development of resilience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1094: 116–124.
  • Serre D., Barroca B., 2013. Natural hazard resilient cities. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13: 2675–2678.
  • Simmie J., Martin R., 2010. The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3: 27–43.
  • Świątek L., 2015. Miasta spustoszone. Koncepcja rezyliencji w procesie rewitalizacji małych i średnich miast (Vacant cities. Resilience concept in the regeneration process of small and medium-sized towns). Space & FORM, Przestrzeń i FORMA 23/1: 117–128.
  • Tompkins E., Hurlston L.A., 2012. Public-private partnerships in the provision of environmental governance. In: Boyd E., Folke C. (eds), Features of adaptive governance: Networks, hybrids and multilevel transformations in coupled SES. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Vale L., Campanella T. (eds), (2005). The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Werner E.E., 1994. Overcoming the odds. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 15(2): 131–136.
  • Werner E.E., 2000. Protective factors and individual resilience. In: Shonkoff J.P., Meisels S.J. (eds), Handbook of early childhood intervention. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 115–132.
  • Wink R., 2012. Economic resilience as the evolutionary concept for post-industrial regions: The case of Leipzig and Halle. Journal of Economics and Management 10: 59–72.
  • Yates T.M., Egeland B., Sroufe A., 2003. Rethinking resilience. A developmental process perspective. In: Luthar S.S. (ed.), Resilience and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 243–259.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_2478_quageo-2018-0018
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.