Accommodation of L2 Speech in a Repetition Task: Exploring Paralinguistic Imitation

• Authors: Léa Burin
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Phonetic convergence is the process by which a speaker adapts his/her speech to sound more similar to his/her interlocutor. While most studies analysing this process have been conducted amongst speakers sharing the same language or variety, this experiment focuses on imitation between non-native and native speakers in a repetition task. The data is a fragment from the ANGLISH corpus designed by Anne Tortel (Tortel, 2008). 40 French speakers (10 male intermediate, 10 male advanced, 10 female intermediate and 10 female advanced learners) were asked to repeat a set of 20 sentences produced by British native speakers. Segmental (vowel quality), suprasegmental (vowel duration) and voice quality were analysed. Level of proficiency, gender and model talker were taken as independent variables. Level appeared not to be a relevant parameter due to a high amount of inter-individual variability amongst groups. Somewhat contradictory results were observed for vowel duration and F1-F2 distance for male learners converged more than female learners. Our hypothesis that low vowels display a higher degree of imitation, and especially within the F1 dimension (Babel, 2012), was partially validated. Convergence in vowel duration in order to sound more native-like was also observed (Zając, 2013). Regarding the analysis of voice quality, and more particularly of creaky voice, observations suggest that some advanced female learners creaked more than the native speakers and more in the reading task, which indicate, both linguistic idiosyncrasy and accommodation towards the native speakers. Low vowels seem also to be more likely to be produced with a creaky voice, especially at the end of prosodic constituents.

Keywords

EN

imitation; convergence; vowel spectra; vowel duration; creaky voice

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 16
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 377-406

Dates

published

2018-12-30

Contributors

author

Léa Burin

• Paris Diderot University, France

References

• Abercrombie, David. 1967. Elements of general phonetics. Chicago: Aldine.
• Babel, Molly. 2009. Selective vowel imitation in spontaneous phonetic accommodation. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Report. 163-194.
• Babel, Molly. 2011. Imitation in speech. Acoustics Today 7(4). 16-22.
• Babel, Molly. 2012. Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics 40(1). 177-189.
• Babel, Molly, McGuire, Grant, Walters, Sophia and Alice Nicholls. 2014. Novelty and social preference in phonetic accommodation. Laboratory Phonology 5(1). 123-150.
• Barriuso, Taylor Anne and Rachel Hayes-Herb. (2018). High variability phonetic training as a bridge from research to practice. The CATESOL Journal 30(1). 177-194.
• Best, Catherine T. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Winifred Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: issues in cross-language research, 171-204. Timonium, MD: York Press.
• Best, Catherine T. and Michael D. Tyler. 2007. Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Murray J. Munro and Ocke-Schwen Bohn (eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production, 13-34. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
• Bilous, Frances R. and Robert M. Krauss. 1988. Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language & Communication 8. 183-194.
• Black, John.W. (1949). Loudness of speaking: The effect of heard stimuli on spoken responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology 39. 311-315.
• Boersma, Paul and David Weenink. 2015. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.4.08). Available from http://www.praat.org
• Bourhis, Richard Y. 1979. Language in ethnic interaction: A social psychological approach. In Howard Giles and Bernard Saint Jacques (eds.), Language and Ethnic Relations, 117-141. Oxford: Pergamon.
• Byrne, Donn. 1997. An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 14(3). 417-431.
• Chartrand, Tanya L. and John A. Bargh. 1999. The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-Behavior Link and Social Interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(6). 893-910.
• Coupland, Nicolas and Howard Giles. 1988. Introduction: The communicative contexts of accommodation. Language and Communication 8(3/4). 175-182.
• Eisikovits, Edina. 1987. Sex differences in inter-group and intra-group interaction among adolescents. In Anne Pauwels (ed.), Women and Language in Australia and New Zealand Society, 45-58. Sydney: Australian Professional Publications.
• Flege, James Emil. 1987. The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15. 47-65.
• Flege, James Emil. 1988. The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. In Harris Winitz (ed.), Human communication and Its Disorders, A Review. Norwood, 224-240. NJ: Ablex.
• Flege, James Emil. 1995. Second Language Speech Learning: Theory, Findings and Problems. In Winifred Strange (ed.), Speech perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, 233-277. Timomium, MD: York Press.
• Flege, James Emil, Munro, Murray J. and Ian R.A. MacKay. 1995. Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(5). 3125-3134.
• Flege, James Emil., Bohn, Ocke-Shwen and Sunyoung Jang. 1997. Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics 25. 437-470.
• Gallois, Cynthia and Victor J. Callan. 1988. Communication accommodation and the prototypical speaker: Predicting evaluations of status and solidarity. Language and Communication 8. 271-283.
• Gambi, Chiara and Martin J. Pickering. 2013. Prediction and imitation in speech. Frontiers in Psychology 4(340). 1-9.
• Garnier, Maëva, Lamalle, Laurent and Marc Sato. 2013. Neural correlates of phonetic convergence and speech imitation. Frontiers in Psychology 4(600). 1-15.
• Giles, Howard. 1973. Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15. 87-105.
• Giles, Howard and Patricia Johnson. 1987. Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 68. 69- 99.
• Giles, Howard, Coupland, Nikolas and Justine Coupland. 1991. Accommodation Theory: Communication, Context and Consequence. In Justine Coupland, Nikolas Coupland and Howard Giles (eds.), Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics, 1-68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Goldinger, Stephen D. 1997. Perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In Keith Johnson and John W. Mullenix (eds.), Talker variability in speech processing, 33-66. San Diego: Academic Press.
• Goldinger, Stephen D. 1998. Echoes of Echoes? An Episodic Theory of Lexical Access. Psychological review 105(2). 251-27.
• Goldinger, Stephen D. and Tamiko Azuma. 2004. Episodic memory reflected in printed word naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11(4).716-722.
• Kim, Midam, Horton, William S. and Ann R. Bradlow. 2011. Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology 2(1). 125-156.
• Kuhl, Patricia K. and Paul Iverson. 1995. Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(1). 553-562.
• Lakin, Jessica L., Jefferis, Valerie E., Cheng, Clara Michelle and Tanya L. Chartrand. 2003. The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 27. 145-161
• Laver, John and Peter Trudgill. 1979. Phonetic and linguistic markers in speech. In Klaus Scherer and Howard Giles (eds.), Social markers in speech, 1-10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Laver, John. 1989. Cognitive science and speech: A framework for research. In Helmut Schnelle and Niels O. Bernsen (eds.), Logic and linguistics: Research directions in cognitive science: European perspective, vol. 2, 37-71. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Namy Laura L., Nygaard, Lynne C. and Denise Sauerteig. 2002. Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(4). 422-43.
• Natale, Michael. 1975. Convergence of Mean Vocal Intensity in Dyadic Communication as a Function of Social Desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(5). 790-804.
• Nilsenová, Marie and Marc Swerts. 2012. Prosodic Adaptation in Language Learning. In Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, 77-94. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
• Pardo, Jennifer S. 2006. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(4). 2382-2393.
• Pardo, Jennifer S., Cajory Jay, Isabel and Robert M. Krauss. 2010. Conversational role influences speech imitation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72(8). 2254-2264.
• Pardo, Jennifer S., Cajori Jay, Isabel, Hoshino, Risa, Hasbun, Sara Maria, Sowemimo-Coker, Chantal and Robert M. Krauss. 2013. Influence of Role-Switching on Phonetic Convergence in Conversation. Discourse Processes 50(4). 276-300.
• Rojczyk, Arkadiusz. 2013. Phonetic imitation of L2 vowels in a rapid shadowing task. In John Levis and Kimberly LeVelle (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, 66-76. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
• Sato, Marc, Grabski, Krystyna, Garnier, Maëva, Granjon, Lionel, Schwartz, Jean-Luc and Noël Nguyen, N. 2013. Converging towards a common speech code: imitative and perceptuo-motor recalibration processes in speech production. Frontiers in Cognitive Sciences 4(422). 1-14.
• Tortel, Anne. 2008. ≪ ANGLISH ≫. TIPA, Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage 27. 111-122.
• Tortel, Anne. 2013. Prosody in a contrastive learner corpus. In Ana Diaz-Negrillo, Nicolas Ballier and Paul Thompson (eds.), Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data, 227-249. Amsterdam : John Benjamins. B.V
• Watzlawick, Paul, Beavin Bavelas, Janet and Don D. Jackson. 1967. Pragmatics of Human Communication. New-York: Norton.
• Willemyns, Michael, Gallois, Cynthia, Callan, Victor J. and Jeffery Pittam. 1997. Accent accommodation in the job interview: Impact of interviewer accent and gender. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16. 3-22.
• Wells. John C. 1982. Accents of English: The British Isles, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Welkowitz, Joan, Feldstein, Stanley, Finkelstein, Markand Lawrence Aylesworth. 1972. Changes in vocal intensity as a function of interspeaker influence. Perceptual and Motor Skills 35. 715-18.
• Zuengler, Jane. 1982. Applying accommodation theory to variable performance data in L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 4. 181-192.
• Zając, Magdalena. 2013. Phonetic imitation of vowel duration in L2 speech. Research in Language 11(1). 19-29.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/rela-2018-0019