Topological Modelling of Grammatical and Lexical Aspect in English

• Authors: Waldemar Skrzypczak
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper stems from a broader research project entitled Analog-based Modelling of Meaning Representations in English (Skrzypczak 2006), and aims to present grammatical aspect and lexical aspect as two modes of encoding the temporal profiles within the conceptualisation of processes (terminologically, in Langackerian sense, imperfective and perfective processes, otherwise, variously labelled as stative and dynamic verbs, i. e. states vs. discrete ‘unitary’ events and nondiscrete ‘unbounded’ processes). It is assumed that aspect in both cases – as a process-profiling category – is analogous to the profiling of things and atemporal relations (in the sense of Langacker 1987, 1990, 2000), given the maximisation of the temporal domain in the characterisation of processes (perfective and imperfective, hence: dynamic and stative), and minimalisation of the temporal domain during the conceptualisation of things (conceptually independent entities) and atemporal relations (conceptually dependent atemporal configurations). The analogy between nouns and verbs in terms of ‘granularity’ has been so far variously addressed by Langacker (1990), Jackendoff (1991) and Talmy (2001), and also constitutes the core assumption in my research on topological modelling.

Keywords

EN

grammatical and lexical aspect; states; events; processes; profiling

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2007
• Volume: 5
• Pages: 185-204

Dates

published

2007-12-18

Contributors

author

Waldemar Skrzypczak

• Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń

References

• Croft, W. A. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive organization of Information. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Croft, W. A. 2003. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Crystal, D. 1991. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Third Edition. Oxford UK – Cambridge MA. Basil Blackwell.
• Gärdenfors, P. 2001. Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, Mass./London, England: MIT Press.
• Jackendoff, R. 1991. Semantic Structures. Cambridge MA – London, England: MIT Press.
• Johnson, M. 1987. Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, G. 1997. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, G. and E. Sweetser. 1998. Foreword to the Cambridge edition of G. Fauconnier’s Mental Spaces, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I., Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Langacker, R. W. 1990. Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Meaning. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Langacker, R. W. 2000. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Matthews, P. H. 1997. Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
• Skrzypczak, W. 1991, ‘A synthetic approach to the teaching of grammar: cognitive modeling’. An unpublished paper read at The 25th International Conference of IATEFL – International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language - Exeter, England.
• Skrzypczak, W. 1989. Supplementary Materials for the EFL Classroom. Toruń: Nicholaus Copernicus University Press.
• Skrzypczak, W. 2001. “The English Verb System Systematically Represented: A Heuristic Model for Practical and Theoretical Applications”. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Linguistica Anglica 3.
• Skrzypczak, W. 2005. ‘Cognitive dimensions of grammar and meaning. A survey of cognitive linguistic metalanguage’. Acta Universitatis Nicholai Copernici. English Studies XIV – Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 375.
• Skrzypczak, W. 2006, Analog-based Modelling of Meaning Representations in English. Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press.
• Stalmaszczyk, P. 1999. Structural Predication in Generative Grammar. Łódź: Łódź University Press.
• Talmy, L. 2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Vol I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA – London, England: Bradford Book, MIT Press.
• Van Valin, R. D. and R. La Polla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10015-007-0008-0