Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2007 | 5 | 235-250

Article title

In a Methodological Trap. Review article of „The phonology of Danish”, by Hans Basbøll. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

Year

Volume

5

Pages

235-250

Physical description

Dates

published
2007-12-18

Contributors

  • Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan

References

  • Anderson, S. R. 1969. West-Scandinavian vowel systems and the ordering of phonological rules. Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  • Anderson, S. R. 1981. ‘‘Why phonology isn’t natural’’. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 494–539.
  • Árnason, K. 1980. Quantity in historical phonology. Icelandic and related cases. (= Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Basbøll, H. 1969. ‘‘The phoneme system of Advanced Standard Copenhagen’’. Annual Reports of the Institute of Phonetics 3, 33–54.
  • Basbøll, H. 1972. ‘‘Some conditioning phonological factors for the pronunciation of short vowels in Danish with special reference to syllabification.’’ In: Kiefer F. (ed.), 5–30.
  • Basbøll, H. 1975. ‘‘Grammatical boundaries in phonology.’’ Annual Reports of the Institute of Phonetics 9, 109–135.
  • Basbøll, H. 1985. ‘‘Stød in Modern Danish.’’ Folia Linguistica 19, 1–50.
  • Basbøll, H. 1988. ‘‘The Modern Danish stød and phonological weight.’’ In: Bertinetto P. and M. Loporcaro (eds), 119–152.
  • Basbøll, H. 1998. ‘‘Nyt om stødet i moderne rigsdansk – om smaspillet mellem lydstruktur og ordgrammatik.’’ Danske Studier 1998, 33–86.
  • Basbøll, H. 2003. ‘‘Prosody, productivity and word structure: the stød pattern of Modern Danish.’’ Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26.1, 5–44.
  • Benediktsson, H. 1969. ‘‘The semivowels of Icelandic. Underlying vs. surface structure and phonological change.’’ In: Tilegnet Carl Hj. Borgstrøm. Et festskrift på 60-årsdagen fra hans elever, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 13–29.
  • Benediktsson, H. 1970. ‘‘Aspects of historical phonology.’’ In: Benediktsson H. (ed.), 87–142.
  • Benediktsson, H. (ed.). 1970. The Nordic languages and modern linguistics. Reykjavík: Vísindafélag Íslendinga.
  • Bertinetto, P. M. and M. Loporcaro (eds). 1988. Certamen Phonologicum. Papers from the 1987 Cortona Phonology Meeting. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.
  • Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. (ed.). 2001. Constraints and preferences. (=Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs 134). Berlin–New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Elert, C.-Ch. 1966. Allmän och svensk fonetik. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
  • Elert, C.-Ch. 1970. Ljud och ord i svenskan. Almqvist & Wiksell.
  • Eliasson, S. 1978. ‘‘Swedish quantity revisited.’’ In: Gårding E. et al. (eds.), 111–122.
  • Eliasson, S. 1985. ‘‘Stress alternations and vowel length: new evidence for an underlying nine-vowel system in Swedish.’’ Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8, 101–129.
  • Endresen, R. T. 1974. ‘‘On retroflex segments in Norwegian.’’ Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 28, 73–78. Reprinted in: Jahr E. H. and O. Lorentz (eds) 1981, 287–292.
  • Endresen, R. T. 1977. ‘‘An alternative theory of stress and tonemes in Eastern Norwegian.’’ Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 31, 21–46. Reprinted in: Jahr E. H. and O. Lorentz (eds) 1983, 362–387.
  • Fischer-Jørgensen, E. 1989. ‘‘Phonetic analysis of the stød in standard Danish.’’ Phonetica 46, 1–59.
  • Fischer-Jørgensen, E. 2001. Tryk i œldre dansk. Sammensœtninger og Afledninger. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Historisk-Filosofiske Meddelelser 84. Copenhagen: C.A.Reitzel.
  • Fretheim, T. 1969. ‘‘Norwegian stress and quantity reconsidered.’’ Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 23, 76–96. Reprinted in: Jahr E. H. and O. Lorentz (eds) 1983, 315–334.
  • Fretheim, T. 1974. ‘‘The Norwegian retroflex flap and the concept of ’natural class’ in phonology.’’ Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 28, 79–85. Reprinted in: Jahr E. H. and O. Lorentz (eds) 1981, 293–299.
  • Grønnum, N. and H. Basbøll. 2001. ‘‘Consonant length, stød and morae in Standard Danish.’’ Phonetica 58, 230–253.
  • Gussmann, E. 2000. ‘‘Icelandic preaspiration as a testing ground for phonological theories.’’ In: Thórhallsdóttir G. (ed.), 93–103.
  • Gussmann, E. 2003. ‘‘Are there branching onsets in Modern Icelandic?’’ In: Ploch S. (ed.), 321–337.
  • Gussmann, E. 2004. ‘‘The irrelevance of phonetics: the Polish palatalisation of velars.’’ Corpus 3, 125–152.
  • Gårding, E. 1977. The Scandinavian word accents. Lund: CWK Gleerup.
  • Gårding, E., G. Bruce and R. Bannert (eds) 1978. Nordic prosody. Lund: Department of Linguistics, University of Lund.
  • Hagström, B. 1967. Ändelsevokalerna i färöiskan. En fonetisk-fonologisk studie. Stockholm Studies in Scandinavian Philology 6. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
  • Halle, M. 1961. ‘‘On the role of simplicity in linguistic descriptions.’’ Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics XII, 89–94.
  • Harris, J. 1994. English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hellberg, S. 1978. ‘‘Unnatural phonology.’’ Journal of Linguistics 14, 129–375.
  • Hellberg, S. 1980. ‘‘Apparent naturalness in Faroese phonology.’’ Nordic Journal of Linguistics 3, 1–24.
  • Hovdhauen, E., F. Karlsson, C. Henriksen and B. Sigurd 2000. The history of linguistics in the Nordic countries. Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Helsinki.
  • Jahr, E. H. and O. Lorentz (eds) 1981. Fonologi/Phonology. Oslo: Novus forlag.
  • Jahr, E. H. and O. Lorentz (eds) 1983. Prosodi/Prosody. Oslo: Novus forlag.
  • Kenstowicz, M. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Kiefer, F. (ed.). 1972. Derivational processes. Stockholm: KVAL.
  • Kristoffersen, G. 2000. The phonology of Norwegian. (= The phonology of the world’s languages). Oxford: Oxford UP.
  • Larsen, U. B. 1994. Some aspects of vowel length and stød in Modern Danish. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. University of Paris 7.
  • Petersen, H. P. 1993. ‘‘Skerpingin í føroyskum.’’ In: Snædal M. and T. Sigurw¯ardóttir (eds), 11–19.
  • Petersen, H. P. 1999. ‘‘Metathesis in /skt/-sequences in Faroese.’’ Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 21, 172–180.
  • Ploch, S. 2003. ‘‘Metatheoretical problems in phonology with Occam’s razor and non-ad-hoc-ness.’’ In: PlochS. (ed.), 149–201.
  • Ploch, S. (ed.) 2003. Living on the edge. 28 papers in honour of Jonathan Kaye (= Studies in generative grammar 62). Berlin–New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Rischel, J. 1968. ‘‘Diphthongization in Faroese.’’ Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 11, 89–118.
  • Rischel, J. 1969. ‘‘Notes on the Danish vowel pattern.’’ Annual Reports of the Institute of Phonetics 3, 177–205.
  • Rischel, J. 1970. ‘‘Consonant gradation. A problem in Danish phonology and morphology.’’ In: Benediktsson H. (ed.), 460–480.
  • Rischel, J. 2001. ‘‘Om stødets opkomst.’’ Pluridicta 38, 16–25.
  • Ségéral, P. and T. Scheer. 2001. ‘‘Abstractness in phonology: the case of virtual geminates.’’ In: Dziubalska-Kołaczyk K. (ed.), 311–337.
  • Snædal, M. and T. Sigurðardóttir. (eds). 1993. Frœndafundur 1. Reykjavík: Háskólaútgáfan.
  • Thórhallsdóttir, G. (ed.). 2000. The Nordic languages and modern linguistics 10. Reykjavík: Institute of Linguistics.
  • Thráinsson, H. 1978. ‘‘On the phonology of Icelandic preaspiration.’’ Nordic Journal of Linguistics 1, 3–54.
  • Thráinsson, H., H. P. Petersen, J. Í. L. Jacobsen, Z. S. Hansen 2004. Faroese. An overview and reference grammar. To´rshavn: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag.
  • Yoshida, S. 1990. ‘‘A government-based analysis of the ‘mora’ in Japanese.’’ Phonology 7, 331–351.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_2478_v10015-007-0012-4
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.