Rhythm and Vowel Quality in Accents of English

• Authors: Geoff Schwartz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper will examine rhythmic differences among native and non-native accents of English, and report on a pilot experiment investigating a hypothesized interaction between rhythm and vowel quality. A new metric, % SteadyState, an acoustic measure that quantifies the purity of vowels, appears to capture rhythmic differences that have been reported among various native and non-native accents of English. In the tradition of other recently developed rhythm metrics, these findings suggest a link between rhythm and segmental phonology. Additionally, the perspective gained from this study may be beneficial to learners whose goal is native-like vowel quality, offering an understanding of the dynamic properties of English vowels.

Keywords

EN

phonology; rhythm; vowel quality; English pronunciation

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 8
• Pages: 135-147

Dates

published

2010-10-19

Contributors

author

Geoff Schwartz

• Adam Mickiewicz University

References

• Abercrombie, D. 1967. Elements of general phonetics, Chicago: Aldine.
• Bertinetto, P. 1989. Reflections on the dichotomy ‘stress’ vs. ‘syllable-timing’. Revue de Phonetique Appliquee, 91-93, 99-130.
• Boersma, P. and S. Hamann. 2009. Loanword adaptation as first-language phonological perception. In Calabrese, A. and W. L. Wetzels (eds.), Loanword phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 11-58.
• Dellwo, V. 2006. Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for deltaC. Language and Language Processing: Proceedings of the 38th Linguistic Colloquium ed. by Pawel Karnowski & Imre Szigeti. 231-241. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Donegan, P. and D. Stampe. 1983. Rhythm and the holistic organization of language structure. In Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax. Chicago: CLS 19, 337-353.
• Hume, E., K. Johnson, M. Seo, G. Tserdanelis and S. Winters. 1999. A cross-linguistic study of stop place perception. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2069-2072.
• Jenkins, J. 2000. The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: OUP.
• Low, L. E.; E. Grabe and F. Nolan. 2000. Quantitative Characterizations of Speech Rhythm: Syllable-Timing in Singapore English, Language and Speech, 43(4), pp.377-401.
• Pike, K. L. 1945. The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
• Ramus, F., M. Nespor and J. Mehler. 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 73, 265-292. 10585517
• Schwartz, G. 2007. Vowel quality and its holistic implications for phonology. Ms. Adam Mickiewicz University.
• Scott, S. 1993. P-centres in speech - an acoustic analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, University College London.
• Strange, W. 1989. Evolving theories of vowel perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85. 2081-2087.
• Strange, W., J. Jenkins and T. Johnson. 1983. Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 695-705.
• Wagner, P. 2007. Visualising levels of rhythmic organization. Proceedings of ICPhS XVI. Saarbrucken.
• White, L. and S. L. Mattys. 2007. Rhythmic typology and variation in first and second languages. In Prieto, P., J. Mascaró and M.-J. Solé (eds.), Segmental and Prosodic issues in Romance Phonology. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory series (pp. 237-257). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Wright, R., S. Frisch and D. Pisoni. 1997. Speech Perception. Research on Spoken Language Processing, Progress Report No. 21. Indiana University.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10015-010-0011-8