Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 35 | 4 | 188-204

Article title

Circular behaviours undertaken by Polish households - a preliminary analysis of research results

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
The main aim of the paper is to analyse and evaluate the possible relation between circular behaviours undertaken by the households and the socio-economic features describing them. The paper presents the results of the author’s research conducted among Polish households on the territory of two voivodeships: Podkarpackie and Małopolskie. In the article, the author presents the concept of circular behaviours (understood as an element of pro-ecological behaviours), as well as the result of the preliminary analysis of the frequency of exhibiting those behaviours in the households. This analysis is based on evidence regarding the possible differences between the households due to their distinct features. To indicate the possible differences the Chi2 Test of Independence was used. Obtained results indicate that some socio-economic features may have an influence on the frequency of conducting circular behaviours. It could be important due to the establishment of supporting activities aiming at increasing the overall level of circularity among households (as an economic sector). This article is the fourth one in the publication series devoted to circular economy and sustainable development matters.

Contributors

  • Pedagogical University of Krakow, Institute of Law and Economics, Department of Entrepreneurship and Social Innovations

References

  • Brooks, J.S., Wilson, C. (2015). The influence of contextual cues on the perceived status of consumption – reducing behavior. Ecological Economics, 117, 108–117. doi: 10.1016/ j.ecolecon.2015.06.015
  • Carrete, L., Castaño, R., Felix, R., Centeno, E., González, E. (2012). Green consumer behavior in an emerging economy: confusion, credibility, and compatibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(7), 470–481. doi:10.1108/07363761211274983
  • Concari, A., Kok, G., Martens, P. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach. Sustainability, 12(11), 4452. doi: 10.3390/ su12114452
  • Costa Pinto, D., Maurer Herter, M., Rossi, P., Meucci Nique, W., Borges, A. (2019). Recycling cooperation and buying status: Effects of pure and competitive altruism on sustainable behaviors, European Journal of Marketing, 53(5), 944–971. doi: 10.1108/EJM-09-017-0557
  • Czikkely, M., Oláh, J., Lakner, Z., Fogarassy, C., Popp, J. (2018). Waste water treatment with adsorptions by mushroom compost: The circular economic valuation concept for material cycles, International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 10, 1–12. doi: 10.1177/1847979018809863
  • Figueroa-García, E.C., García-Machado, J.J., Pérez-Bustamante Yábar, D.C. (2018). Modeling the Social Factors That Determine Sustainable Consumption Behavior in the Community of Madrid. Sustainability, 10(8), 2811. doi: 10.3390/su10082811
  • Fischer, D., Böhme, T., Geiger, S.M. (2017). Measuring young consumers’ sustainable consumption behavior. Development and validation of the YCSCB scale. Young Consumers, 18(3), 312–326. doi: 10.1108/YC-03-2017-00671
  • Geisendorf, S., Pietrulla, F. (2018). The circular economy and circular economic concepts – a literature analysis and redefinition. Thunderbird International Business Review, 60(5), 771–782. doi: 10.1002/tie.21924
  • GUS. (2013). Budżet czasu ludności [Time use survey]. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny [Statistics Poland].
  • Heeren, A.J., Singh, A.S., Zwickle, A., Koontz, T.M., Slagle, K.M., McCreery, A.C. (2016). Is sustainability knowledge half the battle? An examination of sustainability knowledge, attitudes, norms, and efficacy to understand sustainable behaviours. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(5), 613–632. doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-02-2015-0014
  • Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkerts, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy. An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 127, 221–232. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
  • Korsunova, A., Horn, S., Vainio, A. (2021). Understanding circular economy in everyday life. Perceptions of young adults in the Finnish context. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 759–769. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.038
  • Lakatos, E.S, Dan, V., Cioca, L.I., Bacali, L., Ciobanu, A.M. (2016). How Supportive Are Romanian Consumers of the Circular Economy Concept. A Survey. Sustainability, 8(8), 789. doi: 10.3390/su8080789
  • Lakatos, E.S., Cioca, L.I., Dan, V., Ciomos, A.O., Crisan, O.A., Barsan, G. (2018). Studies and Investigation about the Attitude towards Sustainable Production, Consumption and Waste Generation in Line with Circular Economy in Romania. Sustainability, 10(3), 865. doi: 10.3390/su10030865
  • Lee, D.J., Bahl, A., Black, G.S., Duber – Smith, D.C., Vowles, N.S. (2016). Sustainable and non – sustainable consumer behavior in young adults. Young Consumers, 17(1), 78–93. doi: 10.1108/ YC-08-2015-00548
  • Lin, S.P. (2013). The gap between global issues and personal behaviors. Pro-environmental behaviors of citizens toward climate change in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 18, 773–783. doi: 10.1007/s11027-012-9387-1
  • Mancini, P., Marchini, A., Simeone, M. (2017). Which are the sustainable attributes affecting the real consumption behaviour? Consumer understanding and choices. British Food Journal, 119(8), 1839–1853. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-11-2016-0574
  • Manickam, P., Duraisamy, G. (2019). 3Rs and circular economy. In: S.S. Muthu (ed.), Circular economy in textiles and apparel. Processing, manufacturing, and design. Duxford, United Kingdom; Cambridge, MA: Woodhead Publishing, 77–93. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102630-4.00004-2
  • Matharu, M., Jain, R., Kamboj, S. (2020). Understanding the impact of lifestyle on sustainable consumption behavior. A sharing economy perspective. Management of Environmental Quality, 32(1), 20–40. doi: 10.1108/MEQ-02-2020-0036
  • Nainggolan, D., Pedersen, A.B., Smed, S., Zemo, K.H., Hasler, B., Termansen, M. (2019). Consumers in a circular economy. Economic analysis of household waste sorting behaviour. Ecological Economics, 166, 106402. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106402
  • Pearce, D., Turner, R.K. (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Rousta, K., Bolton, K., Dahlén, L. (2016). A Procedure to Transform Recycling Behavior for Source Separation of Household Waste. Recycling, 1, 147–165. doi: 10.3390/recycling1010147
  • Sinclair, M., Sheldrick, L., Moreno, M., Dewberry, E. (2018). Consumer Intervention Mapping – A Tool for Designing Future Product Strategies within Circular Product Service Systems. Sustainability, 10, 2088. doi: 10.3390/su10062088
  • Shaw, P.J., Smith, M.M., Williams, I.D. (2018). On the Prevention of Avoidable Food Waste from Domestic Households. Recycling, 3, 24. doi: 10.3390/recycling3020024
  • Shevchenko, T., Laitala, K., Danko, Y. (2019). Understanding Consumer E-Waste Recycling Behavior. Introducing a New Economic Incentive to Increase the Collection Rates, Sustainability, 11(9), 2656. doi: 10.3390/su11092656
  • Szczygieł, E. (2020a). Problem pomiaru cyrkularności w gospodarstwach domowych w kontekście podnoszenia jakości ich życia [The problem of circularity measurement in households in the context of improving their quality of life ]. Rocznik Administracji Publicznej [Public Administration Yearbook], 6, 237–253. doi: 10.4467/24497800RAP.20.013.12907
  • Szczygieł, E. (2020b). Circular Economy as an Answer to the Challenge of Improving the Quality of Life. Hradec Economic Days. The International Conference, 10, 770–781. doi: 10.36689/ uhk/hed/2020-01-087
  • Zrałek, J., Burgiel, A. (2020). Prospects for a Sustainable Future. Mapping Sustainable Behaviors According to Consumer Perceptions. Review of Business. Interdisciplinary Journal on Risk and Society, 40(1), 35–50.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2211946

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_24917_20801653_354_12
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.