Spór o ciągłość życia i umysłu. Argumenty na rzecz kognitywizmu

• Authors: Michał Piekarski

Abstracts

EN

The dispute over the continuity of life and mind. Arguments for cognitivism: The purpose of this paper is to discuss the position of non-cognitivism on the issue of the so-called dispute over the continuity / discontinuity of life and mind. In discussing the views of Michael Kirchhoff and Tom Froese, I will point out some difficulties related to their position. Next, I will formulate three arguments in favor of the cognitive alternative, emphasizing the need to resort to semantic information in explaining these phenomena. According to noncognitivist position, there is a continuity in the life-mind line, which can be justified by referring to the concept of Shannon’s syntactic information. Opponents of this thesis, i.e. supporters of cognitivism, claim that the explanation of cognition requires the use of other tools than those used to explanation of life, because, first, the notion of syntactic information does not exhaust the complexity of these phenomena, and, second, the non-cognitive position raises many problems and ambiguities. According to cognitivists, when explaining life and mind, one should refer to the concept of semantic information that is rejected by noncognitivists. In the Conclusion I will analyze the ambiguities and assumptions related to the thesis about the continuity or discontinuity between life and cognitive processes.

Keywords

EN

life; mind; semantic information; syntactic information; free energy principle; normativity; body; content; Markov blankets

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie, Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
• Journal: ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 11
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 71-91

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Michał Piekarski

• Instytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie

Identifiers

DOI

10.24917/20841043.11.1.4

Biblioteka Nauki

2188173