Human Origins Revisited: On the Recognition of Rationality and the Antiquity of the Human Race

• Authors: Michael Chaberek , Rômulo Carleial

Abstracts

EN

Soon after Charles Darwin proposed his theory of the origin of species (1859), Catholic theologians set out to harmonize the evolutionary account with the traditional Christian doctrine of creation. While there have been several attempts at achieving this, all of them encountered philosophical or theological problems. After Humani Generis (1950), the debate among Catholic scholars shifted to questions related to polygenism and the propagation of original sin. In this paper, we show that these new theories adopted philosophically or theologically problematic concepts of hominization. We also argue that there is ample paleontological evidence from anatomy and tool-making to support the claim that the so-called fossil hominids should be categorized as either apes or human beings (Homo sapiens). This postulate invites a new look at human origins, one that remains compatible with modern science as well as traditional theology and metaphysics.

Keywords

EN

hominization; evolution; anthropology; soul; origins

• Publisher: International Étienne Gilson Society
• Journal: Studia Gilsoniana
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 11
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 249-287

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Michael Chaberek

• Polish Dominican Province, En Arche Foundation

• https://orcid.org/000000018071537X

author

Rômulo Carleial

• https://orcid.org/0000000284907202

References

• Acta et decreta Concilii Provinciae Coloniensis, Coloniae: 1862.
• Alexander, Andrew. “Human Origins and Genetics.” The Clergy Review, 49(1964): 344–353.
• Alszeghy, Zoltan and Mauricio Flick. “Peccato Originale in Prospettiva Evoluzionistica.” Gregorianum, 47(1966): 201–225.
• Alszeghy, Zoltan and Mauricio Flick. Il Peccato Originale, Biblioteca di Teologia Contemporanea 12. Brescia: Queriniana, 1972.
• Balter, Michael. “World’s oldest stone tools discovered in Kenya.” Science Apr 14, 2015, doi: 10.1126/science.aab2487.
• “Bruniquel Cave,” accessed Feb 15, 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruniquel_Cave.
• Chaberek, Michael. Catholicism and Evolution: A History from Darwin to Pope Francis, Kettering, OH: Angelico Press 2015.
• Chaberek, Michael. “The Metaphysical Problem for Theistic Evolution: Accidental Change Does Not Generate Substantial Change.” Forum Philosophicum 26/1, Spring 2021: 35–49, DOI: 10.35765/forphil.2021.2601.04.
• Clark, Grahame. World Prehistory: A New Synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
• Craig, William L. In Quest of the Historical Adam: A Biblical and Scientific Exploration. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co., 2021.
• The Decrees of the Council of Vienne, accessed Feb. 17, 2022, https://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum15.htm.
• The Decrees of the Fifth Lateran Council, Session 8, 19 December 1513, accessed Feb. 17, 2022, http://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum18.htm.
• DeSilva, Jeremy M. “Functional morphology of the ankle and the likelihood of climbing in early hominins.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(16): 6567–6572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900270106.
• Haeckel, Ernst. Monism as Connecting Religion and Science: A Man of Science. Trans. J. Gilchrist, London: Adam and Charles Black 1895.
• Henneberg, Maciej. “Decrease of Human Skull Size in the Holocene.” Human Biology 60, no. 3 (1988): 395–405.
• Hofmann, James R. “Catholicism and Evolution: Polygenism and Original Sin (Part II).” Scientia et Fides 9 (1) 2021: 63–129.
• John Paul II, “Address to the Plenary Session on ‘The Origins and Early Evolution of Life’ (22 October 1996).” Papal Addresses to The Pontifical Academy of Sciences 1917–2002 and to The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences 1994–2002, 370–374. Vatican City: The Pontifical Academy of Sciences, 2003.
• Kemp, Kenneth W. “God, Evolution and the Body of Adam.” Scientia et Fides 8 (2) 2020: 139–172.
• Kemp, Kenneth W. “Science, Theology, and Monogenesis.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly vol. 85, no. 2: 217–236.
• Koonin, Eugene V. “The Origin at 150: is a new evolutionary synthesis insight?” Trends Genet. November 2009, 25(11): 473–475.
• Lenartowicz, Piotr. Ludy czy małpoludy: Problem genealogii człowieka. Kraków: Ignatianum 2010.
• Leo XIII, “Arcanum divinae sapientiae.” Acta Sanctae Sedis, 12 (1879), reprint 1968.
• Loke, Andrew T.E. “Reconciling Evolution and Biblical Literalism: A Proposed Research Program.” Theology and Science, vol. 14, no. 2: 160–174.
• Loke, Andrew T.E. Evil, Sin, and Christian Theism. Routledge, 2022.
• Luskin, Casey. “Missing Transitions: Human Origins and the Fossil Record,” Theistic Evolution: A Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Critique, edited by James P. Moreland, Stephen C. Meyer, et al., 437–474. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway Books, 2017.
• McGrew, William C. “Is Primate Tool Use Special? Chimpanzee and New Caledonian Crow Compared.” Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0422.
• Messenger, Ernst C. Evolution and Theology: The Problem of Man’s Origin. New York: Macmillan Company, 1932.
• Meyer, Stephen C. Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design. HarperOne 2013.
• Mivart, St. George J. On the Genesis of Species. London: Macmillan 1871.
• Noble, Denis. The Music of Life: Biology Beyond the Genome. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
• Pius XII, “Humani Generis.” Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 42 (1950).
• Ratzinger, Joseph. In Creation and Evolution: A Conference with Pope Benedict XVI in Castel Gandolfo, ed. Stephan Otto Horn and Siegfried Wiedenhofer, 15–16. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2008.
• Shapiro, James. Evolution: A View from the 21st Century. Chicago: Cognition Press, 2022.
• Shea, John J. Stone Tools in Human Evolution: Behavioral Differences Among Technological Primates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
• Soares Daphne, Niemiller, Matthew L. “Extreme Adaptation in Caves.” The Anatomical Record, 2018 (303): 15–23.
• Suarez, Antoine. “Can we give up the origin of humanity from a primal couple without giving up the teaching of original sin and atonement?” Science and Christian Belief (2015) 27: 59–83.
• Suarez, Antoine. “Transmission at Generation: Could Original Sin Have Happened at the Time When Homo Sapiens Already Had a Large Population Size?” Scientia et Fides, 4 (1) 2016: 253–293.
• Thomas Aquinas, De Veritate, https://isidore.co/aquinas/english/QDde Ver12.htm#5.
• Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1091.htm.
• Toth, Nicholas, Kathy Schick and Sileshi Semaw. “Comparative Study of the Stone Tool-Making Skills of Pan, Australopithecus, and Homo Sapiens.” The Oldowan: Case Studies Into the Earliest Stone Age, edited by Kathy Schick, Nicholas Toth, 156–222. Bloomington: Stone Age Institute and Indiana University, 2006.
• Vuoksimaa, Eero, et al. “Brain structure mediates the association between height and cognitive ability.” Brain Struct Funct 2018, 223(7): 3487–3494. doi:10.1007/s00429-018-1675-4.
• Ward, Carol V., William H. Kimbel, and Donald C. Johnson, “Complete fourth metatarsal and arches in the foot of Australopithecus afarensis.” Science 331(6018): 750–753. doi.org/10.1126/science.1201463.
• Wayman, Erin. “Energy Efficiency Doesn’t Explain Human Walking?” Smithsonian Magazine September 17, 2012. Accessed Feb. 15, 2022. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/energy-efficiency-doesntexplain- human-walking-39161215/.

Identifiers

DOI

10.26385/SG.110210

Biblioteka Nauki

2057139