Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 12 | 1 | 105-132

Article title

Sexual Freedom and Violence in the Neoliberal Capitalist System

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
The sexual revolution of the 20th century was based on a redefinition of the body, which led to a new postmodern sexual ideal in which the body and sexuality were freed from the limitations of biology. This phenomenon was inserted within the logic of capitalism, which proposes itself as a “theory of everything,” that is to say, comprehensive of all human reality. Sexuality thus became an object of consumption, bowing to the logic of the capitalist system in which everything can be bought and sold. This new sexual market is based on sexual freedom, giving rise to a fierce competition between users that reaffirms narcissistic, individualistic patterns. In this sense, through the theory of sexual capital, the monogamous structure that existed prior to the sexual revolution and the new polyamorous structure of postmodernity are compared, with the conclusion that the sexual revolution has generated new forms of unforeseen sexual violence.

Year

Volume

12

Issue

1

Pages

105-132

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

  • Universitat Abat Oliba CEU, CEU Universities, Spain
  • Universitat Abat Oliba CEU, CEU Universities, Spain

References

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. Postmodernity and Its Discontents. New York: Polity Press, 1997.
  • Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge, 2002.
  • Chłodna-Błach, Imelda. From Paideia to High Culture. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2020.
  • Cruz Ortiz de Landázuri, Manuel. “De la biopolítica a la psicopolítica en el pensamiento social de Byung-Chul Han”. Athenea digital 17, no. 1 (2017): 187–203. Denyer, Simon & Gowen, Annie. “Too many men”. The Washington Post, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/world/too-manymen/
  • Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
  • Gallino, Luciano. Finanzcapitalismo. Turin: Einaudi, 2011.
  • Gilson, Étienne. The Metamorphoses of the City of God. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2004.
  • Guillebaud, Jean-Claude. The Tyranny of Pleasure. New York: Algora Publishing, 1999.
  • Han, Byung-Chul. Capitalism and the Death Drive. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2021.
  • Han, Byung-Chul. The Burnout Society. Stanford: Standford University Press, 2015.
  • Han, Byung-Chul. Psychopolitics. London: Verso, 2017.
  • Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, Peter J. “The puzzle of monogamous marriage”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367 (2012): 657–669.
  • Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1909.
  • Houllebecq, Michel. Ampliación del campo de batalla. Barcelona: Anagrama, 2019.
  • Ingraham, Christopher. “The share of Americans not having sex has reached a record high”. The Washington Post, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/03/29/share-americans-not-having-sex-has-reachedrecord-high.
  • Kaplan, Dana & Illouz, Eva. What Is Sexual Capital? Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022.
  • Lasch, Christopher. The Culture of Narcissism. American Life in An Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: Norton & Company, 1991.
  • Lipovetsky, Gilles. La era del vacío. Barcelona: Anagrama, 2000.
  • Lipovetsky, Gilles. La sociedad de la decepción. Barcelona: Anagrama 2008.
  • Lukács, György. History and Class Consciousness. Cambridge: The Mit Press, 1971.
  • Marcuse, Herbert. Eros and Civilization. London and New York: Routledge, 2012.
  • Marcuse, Herbert. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. London and New York: Routledge, 2013.
  • Marx, Karl. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Company, 1904.
  • Marx, Karl. The German Ideology. New York: Prometheus Books, 1998.
  • Matamoros, Alberto. “Amor líquido de Zygmunt Bauman. De los amores líquidos”. Cuaderno de Materiales 23 (2005): 813–815.
  • Millett, Kate. Sexual Politics. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2016.
  • Pesek, William. “Japan’s virginity crisis threatens credit rating”. Forbes, 2019, https://www.forbes.com/sites/williampesek/2019/06/14/japans-virginitycrisis-threatens-credit-rating.
  • Ratzinger, Joseph. Letter To The Bishops Of The Catholic Church on The Collaboration Of Men And Women in The Church And In The World, 2004, https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20040731_collaboration_en.html
  • Reich, Wilhelm. The Sexual Revolution: Toward a Self-Regulating Character Structure. New York: Macmillan, 1971.
  • Sandoval Calle, Ana Elisa. La licuefacción de la sexualidad: una aproximación a la pansexualidad en la modernidad líquida. Quito: Puce, 2016.
  • Segovia, Juan Fernando. “La progresiva destrucción de la naturaleza y la naturaleza humana” in ¿Transhumanismo o posthumanidad? La política y el derecho después del humanismo, ed. Miguel Ayudo (Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2019), 49–82.
  • Spinoza, Baruch. Theological-Political Treatise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Trillo-Figueroa, Jesús. Una revolución silenciosa. La política sexual del feminismo socialista. Madrid: Libros libres, 2007
  • Weber, Max. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2190123

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_26385_SG_120105
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.