Prawo właściwe dla skutków przelewu wierzytelności w stosunku do osób trzecich. Uwagi z perspektywy międzynarodowego prawa upadłościowego

• Authors: Wojciech Klyta

Title variants

EN

The law applicable concerning the third-party effects of the assignment of a claim. Few observations from the perspective of insolvency law

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The claims are rights in personam but the assignment of claims has a hybrid nature. Abolishing the “nomina ossibus inhaerent” rule has increased commercial significance of the assignment of claims. However, the contemporary legal situationleaves parties with great legal uncertainty, as to the question under which circumstances does the cross - borders assignment is valid. A recent judgment of the CJEU of 9 October 2019 (C - 548/18) in case BGL BNP Paribas SA v. TeamBank AG Nürnberg has augmented this uncertainty. The Luxemburg Court ruled that: “Article 14 of the Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 (‘Rome I’) must be interpreted as not designating, directly or by analogy, the applicable law concerning the third-party effects of the assignment of a claim in the event of multiple assignments of the claim by the same creditor to successive assignees”. In this situation, one would highly welcome an attempt to establish a new set of conflict of laws rules relating to the law applicable to third - parties effects of the assignment of claims. This attempt has recently been made by the European Commission in its Report “on the question of the effectiveness of an assignment or subrogation of a claim against third parties and the priority of the assigned or subrogated claim over the right of another person”, dated 29 September 2016. In the present article, the author reviews the most important propositions formulated in the conflicts’ doctrine through the “lens” of the international insolvency law. Multiply provisions of the Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings (recast) - despite many judgments of the CJEU in this area - also lack certainty. Insolvency is a foreseeable risk, but without clear rules concerning the third parties’ effects of the assignment of claims, it may become unenforceable for the creditors of the assignor.

Keywords

PL

assignment; Rome Regulation; Insolvency Regulation; property; center of main interest of the debtor; rights in rem; detrimental acts; location of the claim

EN

assignment; Rome Regulation; Insolvency Regulation; property; center of main interest of the debtor; rights in rem; detrimental acts; location of the claim

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Śląski
• Journal: Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 24
• Pages: 47-75

Dates

published

2019-06-30

Contributors

author

Wojciech Klyta

Identifiers

DOI

10.31261/PPPM.2019.24.03